{"title":"Comparison of General vs. Intraspinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Xu Wang, Jialin Sun, Shuai Kang, Daqing Pei","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of general versus intraspinal anesthesia in lower limb fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and August 2022, the researchers' hospital recruited and randomized 433 patients who underwent surgery for lower limb fractures. The study population was divided into 2 groups. Group A (n=220) received general anesthesia during surgery; group B (n=213) received intraspinal anesthesia. Factors were recorded and analyzed, including anesthesia duration, operative time, length of hospital stay, and laboratory indices such as hemoglobin (Hb), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr). All adverse events were monitored as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in anesthesia duration, surgery time, and length of hospital stay between the two patient groups (P > .05). After receiving different anesthesia approaches, both groups had similar laboratory results (P > .05). The absence of significant differences in adverse events between the two groups indicates that both methods of anesthesia have comparable surgical safety (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both general anesthesia and intraspinal anesthesia provided effective anesthetic effects for lower limb fracture surgery with a similar safety profile. Patients also showed similar laboratory indices and experienced comparable anesthesia duration, operative time, and length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of general versus intraspinal anesthesia in lower limb fracture surgery.
Methods: Between January 2018 and August 2022, the researchers' hospital recruited and randomized 433 patients who underwent surgery for lower limb fractures. The study population was divided into 2 groups. Group A (n=220) received general anesthesia during surgery; group B (n=213) received intraspinal anesthesia. Factors were recorded and analyzed, including anesthesia duration, operative time, length of hospital stay, and laboratory indices such as hemoglobin (Hb), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr). All adverse events were monitored as well.
Results: There were no significant differences in anesthesia duration, surgery time, and length of hospital stay between the two patient groups (P > .05). After receiving different anesthesia approaches, both groups had similar laboratory results (P > .05). The absence of significant differences in adverse events between the two groups indicates that both methods of anesthesia have comparable surgical safety (P > .05).
Conclusion: Both general anesthesia and intraspinal anesthesia provided effective anesthetic effects for lower limb fracture surgery with a similar safety profile. Patients also showed similar laboratory indices and experienced comparable anesthesia duration, operative time, and length of hospital stay.
期刊介绍：
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
