Evaluation of Nurse-Driven Management of Hypoglycemia In Critically Ill Patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024320
Anna Robinson, Michelle A Mathiason, Carol Manchester, Mary Fran Tracy
{"title":"Evaluation of Nurse-Driven Management of Hypoglycemia In Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Anna Robinson, Michelle A Mathiason, Carol Manchester, Mary Fran Tracy","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) patients experience hypoglycemia at nearly 4 times the rate seen in non-ICU counterparts. Although inpatient hypoglycemia management relies on nurse-driven protocols, protocol adherence varies between institutions and units.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare hypoglycemia management between ICU and non-ICU patients in an institution with high adherence to a hypoglycemia protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used retrospective medical record data. Cases were ICU patients aged 18 years or older with at least 1 hypoglycemic event (blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL); non-ICU controls were matched by age within 10 years, sex, and comorbidities. Time from initial hypoglycemic blood glucose level to subsequent blood glucose recheck, number of interventions, time to normoglycemia, and number of spontaneous hypoglycemic events were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 140 ICU patients and 280 non-ICU controls. Median time to blood glucose recheck did not differ significantly between groups (19 minutes for both groups). Difference in mean number of interventions before normoglycemia was statistically but not clinically significant (ICU, 1.12; non-ICU, 1.35; P < .001). Eighty-four percent of ICU patients and 86% of non-ICU patients returned to normoglycemia within 1 hour. Median time to normoglycemia was lower in ICU patients than non-ICU patients (21.5 vs 26 minutes; P = .01). About 25% of patients in both groups experienced a spontaneous hypoglycemic event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to nurse-driven hypoglycemia protocols can be equally effective in ICU and non-ICU patients. Further research is needed to determine protocol adherence barriers and patient characteristics that influence response to hypoglycemia interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 3","pages":"218-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients experience hypoglycemia at nearly 4 times the rate seen in non-ICU counterparts. Although inpatient hypoglycemia management relies on nurse-driven protocols, protocol adherence varies between institutions and units.

Objective: To compare hypoglycemia management between ICU and non-ICU patients in an institution with high adherence to a hypoglycemia protocol.

Methods: This secondary analysis used retrospective medical record data. Cases were ICU patients aged 18 years or older with at least 1 hypoglycemic event (blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL); non-ICU controls were matched by age within 10 years, sex, and comorbidities. Time from initial hypoglycemic blood glucose level to subsequent blood glucose recheck, number of interventions, time to normoglycemia, and number of spontaneous hypoglycemic events were compared between groups.

Results: The sample included 140 ICU patients and 280 non-ICU controls. Median time to blood glucose recheck did not differ significantly between groups (19 minutes for both groups). Difference in mean number of interventions before normoglycemia was statistically but not clinically significant (ICU, 1.12; non-ICU, 1.35; P < .001). Eighty-four percent of ICU patients and 86% of non-ICU patients returned to normoglycemia within 1 hour. Median time to normoglycemia was lower in ICU patients than non-ICU patients (21.5 vs 26 minutes; P = .01). About 25% of patients in both groups experienced a spontaneous hypoglycemic event.

Conclusion: Adherence to nurse-driven hypoglycemia protocols can be equally effective in ICU and non-ICU patients. Further research is needed to determine protocol adherence barriers and patient characteristics that influence response to hypoglycemia interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估重症患者低血糖的护士驱动管理。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)患者的低血糖发生率几乎是非重症监护病房患者的 4 倍。虽然住院病人低血糖管理依赖于护士主导的方案,但不同机构和单位对方案的遵守情况各不相同:目的:比较低血糖治疗方案依从性较高的机构中 ICU 和非 ICU 患者的低血糖管理情况:这项二次分析使用了回顾性病历数据。病例为至少发生过一次低血糖事件(血糖水平< 70 mg/dL)的 18 岁或以上 ICU 患者;非 ICU 对照组的年龄、性别和合并症均在 10 岁以内。两组间比较了从初始低血糖水平到随后血糖复查的时间、干预次数、血糖恢复正常的时间以及自发性低血糖事件的次数:样本包括 140 名重症监护室患者和 280 名非重症监护室对照组患者。两组患者复查血糖的中位时间差异不大(均为 19 分钟)。血糖正常前平均干预次数的差异有统计学意义,但无临床意义(重症监护室,1.12;非重症监护室,1.35;P < .001)。84% 的重症监护室患者和 86% 的非重症监护室患者在 1 小时内恢复正常血糖。重症监护室患者恢复正常血糖的中位时间低于非重症监护室患者(21.5 分钟对 26 分钟;P = .01)。两组患者中约有 25% 的人发生过自发性低血糖:结论:在重症监护病房和非重症监护病房患者中,遵守护士主导的低血糖方案同样有效。需要开展进一步研究,以确定影响低血糖干预反应的协议遵守障碍和患者特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1