ASPMN Position Statement: Authorized Agent Controlled Analgesia

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.016
Michelle Czarnecki MSN, RN, PMGT-BC, CPNP-PC, AP-PMN , Maureen F. Cooney DNP, RN, FNP-BC, PMGT-BC, ACHPN, AP-PMN , Elsa Wuhrman DNP, RN, PMGT-BC, FNP-BC, ACNP-BC
{"title":"ASPMN Position Statement: Authorized Agent Controlled Analgesia","authors":"Michelle Czarnecki MSN, RN, PMGT-BC, CPNP-PC, AP-PMN ,&nbsp;Maureen F. Cooney DNP, RN, FNP-BC, PMGT-BC, ACHPN, AP-PMN ,&nbsp;Elsa Wuhrman DNP, RN, PMGT-BC, FNP-BC, ACNP-BC","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) has reviewed and updated its position statement on the use of authorized agent controlled analgesia (AACA) for patients who are unable to independently utilize a self-dosing analgesic infusion pump, commonly known as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). ASPMN continues to support the use of AACA to provide timely and effective pain management while promoting equitable care for vulnerable patient populations who are unable to use PCA. ASPMN does not support the use of “PCA by Proxy” in which <em>unauthorized</em> individuals activate PCA for a patient. This position statement includes an updated review of the evidence related to AACA. Clinical practice recommendations for authorized agents, nurses, prescribers, and organizations are provided with an emphasis on the importance of appropriate authorized agent selection, education, diligent patient assessment and medication management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 209-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) has reviewed and updated its position statement on the use of authorized agent controlled analgesia (AACA) for patients who are unable to independently utilize a self-dosing analgesic infusion pump, commonly known as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). ASPMN continues to support the use of AACA to provide timely and effective pain management while promoting equitable care for vulnerable patient populations who are unable to use PCA. ASPMN does not support the use of “PCA by Proxy” in which unauthorized individuals activate PCA for a patient. This position statement includes an updated review of the evidence related to AACA. Clinical practice recommendations for authorized agents, nurses, prescribers, and organizations are provided with an emphasis on the importance of appropriate authorized agent selection, education, diligent patient assessment and medication management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASPMN 立场声明:授权代理控制镇痛。
美国疼痛管理护理学会 (ASPMN) 审查并更新了其关于对无法独立使用自给镇痛剂输液泵(俗称患者控制镇痛 (PCA))的患者使用授权制剂控制镇痛 (AACA) 的立场声明。ASPMN 继续支持使用 AACA 提供及时有效的疼痛管理,同时促进对无法使用 PCA 的弱势患者群体的公平护理。ASPMN 不支持使用 "代理 PCA",即未经授权的个人为患者启动 PCA。本立场声明包括对 AACA 相关证据的最新回顾。针对授权代理、护士、处方者和机构提供了临床实践建议,重点强调了适当选择授权代理、教育、勤勉的患者评估和药物管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement. Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1