Bigger Calves from Doing Higher Resistance Training Volume?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2316-7885
Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa, Gabriel Kunevaliki, Felipe Lisboa, Ian Tricoli, Jarlisson Francsuel, Luis Lima, Natã Stavinski, Edilson S Cyrino
{"title":"Bigger Calves from Doing Higher Resistance Training Volume?","authors":"Witalo Kassiano, Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa, Gabriel Kunevaliki, Felipe Lisboa, Ian Tricoli, Jarlisson Francsuel, Luis Lima, Natã Stavinski, Edilson S Cyrino","doi":"10.1055/a-2316-7885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the effects of different weekly calf training sets on muscle size changes. Sixty-one untrained young women performed a calf training program for 6 weeks, 3 d·wk<sup>-1</sup>, with differences in resistance training volume. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 6-SET, 9-SET, and 12-SET weekly calf training sets. The calf raise exercise was performed in sets of 15-20 repetitions maximum. The muscle thickness measurements of medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and soleus (SOL) were taken via B-mode ultrasound. We used the sum of the three-muscle thickness as a proxy for the triceps surae (TS<sub>SUM</sub>). The 12-SET group elicited greater increases than the 6-SET in LG (6-SET=+ 8.1% vs. 12-SET=+ 14.3%; <i>P</i>=0.017), SOL (6-SET=+ 6.7% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.7%; <i>P</i>=0.024), and TS<sub>SUM</sub> (6-SET=+ 6.9% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.0%; <i>P</i>=0.005), but there was no significant difference in MG changes (6-SET=+ 6.6% vs. 12-SET=+ 9.9%; <i>P</i>=0.067). There were no significant differences when comparing 9-SET vs. 6-SET and 12-SET (<i>P</i>≥0.099). Although all groups experienced calf muscle hypertrophy, our results suggest that the higher dose range may optimize triceps surae muscle size gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2316-7885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the effects of different weekly calf training sets on muscle size changes. Sixty-one untrained young women performed a calf training program for 6 weeks, 3 d·wk-1, with differences in resistance training volume. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 6-SET, 9-SET, and 12-SET weekly calf training sets. The calf raise exercise was performed in sets of 15-20 repetitions maximum. The muscle thickness measurements of medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and soleus (SOL) were taken via B-mode ultrasound. We used the sum of the three-muscle thickness as a proxy for the triceps surae (TSSUM). The 12-SET group elicited greater increases than the 6-SET in LG (6-SET=+ 8.1% vs. 12-SET=+ 14.3%; P=0.017), SOL (6-SET=+ 6.7% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.7%; P=0.024), and TSSUM (6-SET=+ 6.9% vs. 12-SET=+ 12.0%; P=0.005), but there was no significant difference in MG changes (6-SET=+ 6.6% vs. 12-SET=+ 9.9%; P=0.067). There were no significant differences when comparing 9-SET vs. 6-SET and 12-SET (P≥0.099). Although all groups experienced calf muscle hypertrophy, our results suggest that the higher dose range may optimize triceps surae muscle size gains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻力训练量越大,小腿越粗壮?
我们比较了不同的小腿训练每周组数对肌肉体积变化的影响。61名未经训练的年轻女性进行了为期6周、每周3天-1天的小腿训练,阻力训练量有所不同。参与者被随机分配到 3 组中的一组:6-SET、9-SET 和 12-SET 小腿训练每周组。小腿抬高训练以 15-20 次为一组。通过 B 型超声波测量内侧腓肠肌(MG)、外侧腓肠肌(LG)和比目鱼肌(SOL)的肌肉厚度。我们用三块肌肉的厚度总和来代表肱三头肌(TSSUM)。在 LG(6-SET = +8.1% vs. 12-SET = +14.3%;P = 0.017)、SOL(6-SET = +6.7% vs. 12-SET = +12.7%;P = 0.024)和 TSSUM(6-SET = +6.9% vs. 12-SET = +12.0%;P = 0.005),但 MG 变化无显著差异(6-SET = +6.6% vs. 12-SET = +9.9%;P = 0.067)。在比较 9-SET 与 6-SET 和 12-SET 时,没有明显差异(P ≥ 0.099)。尽管所有组都出现了小腿肌肉肥大,但我们的结果表明,较高的剂量范围可能会优化肱三头肌的增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1