Utilization of Ocrelizumab within Different Treatment Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis: A 5-Year Population-Based Study.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology International Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.3390/neurolint16020029
Marcello Moccia, Giuseppina Affinito, Giuseppina Marrazzo, Tiziana Ciarambino, Paolo Di Procolo, Licia Confalonieri, Antonio Carotenuto, Maria Petracca, Roberta Lanzillo, Maria Triassi, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Raffaele Palladino
{"title":"Utilization of Ocrelizumab within Different Treatment Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis: A 5-Year Population-Based Study.","authors":"Marcello Moccia, Giuseppina Affinito, Giuseppina Marrazzo, Tiziana Ciarambino, Paolo Di Procolo, Licia Confalonieri, Antonio Carotenuto, Maria Petracca, Roberta Lanzillo, Maria Triassi, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Raffaele Palladino","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16020029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to provide up-to-date real-world evidence on the persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of multiple sclerosis (MS) by comparing ocrelizumab to other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and within different DMT sequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 3371 people with MS who first received or switched DMT prescriptions from January 2018 to December 2022; they were identified through hospital discharge records, drug prescriptions, and exemption codes from the Campania Region (South Italy). We calculated persistence (time from the first prescription to discontinuation or switching to another DMT), adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)), DMT costs, and MS hospital admissions and related costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently prescribed DMT was dimethyl fumarate (n = 815; age 38.90 ± 11.91 years; 69.5% females), followed by ocrelizumab (n = 682; age 46.46 ± 11.29 years; 56.3%); 28.8% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab were naïve to DMTs. Using ocrelizumab as a statistical reference, the risk of discontinuation was higher for other highly active (HR = 6.32; 95%CI = 3.16, 12.63; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (HR = 10.10; 95%CI = 5.10, 19.77; <i>p</i> < 0.01); adherence was lower for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = -0.07; 95%CI = -0.10, -0.04; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = -0.16; 95%CI = -0.19, -0.14; <i>p</i> < 0.01). monthly DMT costs were higher for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 77.45; 95%CI = 29.36, 125.53; <i>p</i> < 0.01) but lower for low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = -772.31; 95%CI = -816.95, -727.66; <i>p</i> < 0.01). The hospital admissions and related costs of MS were similar between ocrelizumab, other highly active DMTs, and other low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, and with ocrelizumab as the first-line DMT after other highly active DMTs and after low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, which was possibly due to the low number of observations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From 2018 to 2022, ocrelizumab was among the most frequently prescribed DMTs, with 28.8% prescriptions to incident MS patients, confirming its relevance in clinical practice. Ocrelizumab was associated with the highest persistence and adherence, pointing towards its favorable benefit-risk profile. The costs of ocrelizumab were lower than those of other highly active DMTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 2","pages":"394-405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11054722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16020029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aim to provide up-to-date real-world evidence on the persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of multiple sclerosis (MS) by comparing ocrelizumab to other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and within different DMT sequences.

Methods: We included 3371 people with MS who first received or switched DMT prescriptions from January 2018 to December 2022; they were identified through hospital discharge records, drug prescriptions, and exemption codes from the Campania Region (South Italy). We calculated persistence (time from the first prescription to discontinuation or switching to another DMT), adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)), DMT costs, and MS hospital admissions and related costs.

Results: The most frequently prescribed DMT was dimethyl fumarate (n = 815; age 38.90 ± 11.91 years; 69.5% females), followed by ocrelizumab (n = 682; age 46.46 ± 11.29 years; 56.3%); 28.8% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab were naïve to DMTs. Using ocrelizumab as a statistical reference, the risk of discontinuation was higher for other highly active (HR = 6.32; 95%CI = 3.16, 12.63; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (HR = 10.10; 95%CI = 5.10, 19.77; p < 0.01); adherence was lower for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = -0.07; 95%CI = -0.10, -0.04; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = -0.16; 95%CI = -0.19, -0.14; p < 0.01). monthly DMT costs were higher for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 77.45; 95%CI = 29.36, 125.53; p < 0.01) but lower for low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = -772.31; 95%CI = -816.95, -727.66; p < 0.01). The hospital admissions and related costs of MS were similar between ocrelizumab, other highly active DMTs, and other low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, and with ocrelizumab as the first-line DMT after other highly active DMTs and after low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, which was possibly due to the low number of observations.

Conclusions: From 2018 to 2022, ocrelizumab was among the most frequently prescribed DMTs, with 28.8% prescriptions to incident MS patients, confirming its relevance in clinical practice. Ocrelizumab was associated with the highest persistence and adherence, pointing towards its favorable benefit-risk profile. The costs of ocrelizumab were lower than those of other highly active DMTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多发性硬化症的不同治疗策略中使用奥克雷珠单抗:一项为期 5 年的人群研究。
背景:我们旨在通过比较奥克立珠单抗与其他疾病修饰治疗(DMT)以及不同DMT序列,提供有关多发性硬化症(MS)的持续性、依从性、医疗资源利用和成本的最新真实证据:我们纳入了3371名在2018年1月至2022年12月期间首次接受或更换DMT处方的多发性硬化症患者;这些患者是通过坎帕尼亚大区(意大利南部)的出院记录、药物处方和豁免代码确定的。我们计算了持续性(从首次处方到停药或换用另一种 DMT 的时间)、依从性(覆盖天数比例(PDC))、DMT 费用以及多发性硬化症入院率和相关费用:最常处方的DMT是富马酸二甲酯(n = 815;年龄为38.90 ± 11.91岁;69.5%为女性),其次是奥柯利珠单抗(n = 682;年龄为46.46 ± 11.29岁;56.3%为女性);28.8%接受奥柯利珠单抗治疗的患者是DMT新患者。以奥柯利珠单抗作为统计参考,其他高活性(HR = 6.32; 95%CI = 3.16, 12.63; p < 0.01)和低/中效DMT的停药风险更高(HR = 10.10; 95%CI = 5.10, 19.77; p < 0.01);其他高活性DMT的依从性更低(Coeff = -0.07; 95%CI = -0.10, -0.04; p < 0.01)和低/中效 DMTs(Coeff = -0.16; 95%CI = -0.19, -0.14; p < 0.01)。其他高活性 DMTs 的每月 DMT 成本较高(Coeff = 77.45; 95%CI = 29.36, 125.53; p < 0.01),但低/中效 DMT 的费用较低(Coeff = -772.31; 95%CI = -816.95, -727.66; p < 0.01)。奥克雷珠单抗、其他高活性DMTs和其他低/中效DMTs之间,以及奥克雷珠单抗作为其他高活性DMTs之后和低/中效DMTs之后的一线DMTs之间,多发性硬化症的入院率和相关费用相似,这可能是由于观察次数较少所致:从2018年到2022年,奥克雷珠单抗是最常处方的DMT之一,占事件性多发性硬化症患者处方的28.8%,证实了其在临床实践中的相关性。奥克雷珠单抗的持续性和依从性最高,表明其具有良好的收益风险特征。奥克雷珠单抗的费用低于其他高活性DMTs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy. UBL3 Interacts with PolyQ-Expanded Huntingtin Fragments and Modifies Their Intracellular Sorting. Redefining Infarction Size for Small-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Syndrome Sinistre: Left Brachiocephalic Vein Compression and its Neurological Manifestations. A Retrospective Study of Lateral Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve Neuropathy: Electrodiagnostic Findings and Etiologies in 49 Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1