Carlotta Scarpa, Martina Grigatti, Sandro Rizzato, Alberto Crema, Vincenzo Vindigni, Franco Bassetto
{"title":"Novel foam dressing with through holes and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Carlotta Scarpa, Martina Grigatti, Sandro Rizzato, Alberto Crema, Vincenzo Vindigni, Franco Bassetto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>NPWTi-d of a topical wound solution has been shown to benefit healing in a variety of wound types. This therapy has traditionally been applied via a standard ROCF-V. In 2017, a new ROCF-CC was introduced at the practice of the authors of the current manuscript for adjunctive management of patients with wounds with thick exudate and/or nonviable tissue and in cases in which surgical debridement is not available or not appropriate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of NPWTi-d with ROCF-CC dressing (treatment) vs NPWTi-d with ROCF-V dressing (control).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational retrospective cohort study of hospital records of patients with VLUs treated with NPWTi-d who received ROCF-CC dressings (n = 11) vs standard ROCF-V dressings (n = 11) was conducted. NPWTi-d was chosen to promote wound healing in VLUs that were not fully responsive to advanced dressings and/or compression bandage. Solution dwell time was 10 minutes, followed by 2.5-hour NPWT cycles at -125 mm Hg. Dressings were changed every 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, mean ± SD duration of therapy and hospital length of stay were shorter in the treatment group vs the control group (duration of therapy, 8.63 days ± 7.05 vs 11.72 days ± 17.41, respectively; P = .05, and length of stay, 9.9 days ± 2.98 vs 12.81 days ± 4.26, respectively; P = .08), but these differences were not statistically significant. Mean wound area reduction was greater in the treatment group than in the control group (14.63 cm2 ± 13.24 and 10.72 cm2 ± 14.06, respectively; P = .51), but this was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROCF-CC dressings were a useful tool in assisting wound bed preparation and reducing time to skin graft closure in this series of complex VLUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 3","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: NPWTi-d of a topical wound solution has been shown to benefit healing in a variety of wound types. This therapy has traditionally been applied via a standard ROCF-V. In 2017, a new ROCF-CC was introduced at the practice of the authors of the current manuscript for adjunctive management of patients with wounds with thick exudate and/or nonviable tissue and in cases in which surgical debridement is not available or not appropriate.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of NPWTi-d with ROCF-CC dressing (treatment) vs NPWTi-d with ROCF-V dressing (control).
Materials and methods: An observational retrospective cohort study of hospital records of patients with VLUs treated with NPWTi-d who received ROCF-CC dressings (n = 11) vs standard ROCF-V dressings (n = 11) was conducted. NPWTi-d was chosen to promote wound healing in VLUs that were not fully responsive to advanced dressings and/or compression bandage. Solution dwell time was 10 minutes, followed by 2.5-hour NPWT cycles at -125 mm Hg. Dressings were changed every 72 hours.
Results: Overall, mean ± SD duration of therapy and hospital length of stay were shorter in the treatment group vs the control group (duration of therapy, 8.63 days ± 7.05 vs 11.72 days ± 17.41, respectively; P = .05, and length of stay, 9.9 days ± 2.98 vs 12.81 days ± 4.26, respectively; P = .08), but these differences were not statistically significant. Mean wound area reduction was greater in the treatment group than in the control group (14.63 cm2 ± 13.24 and 10.72 cm2 ± 14.06, respectively; P = .51), but this was not significant.
Conclusion: ROCF-CC dressings were a useful tool in assisting wound bed preparation and reducing time to skin graft closure in this series of complex VLUs.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.