Autoantibodies in post-treatment Lyme disease and association with clinical symptoms.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-05 DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qcupkk
Marzieh Keshtkarjahromi, Alison W Rebman, Annukka A R Antar, Yukari C Manabe, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Livia A Casciola-Rosen, John N Aucott, John B Miller
{"title":"Autoantibodies in post-treatment Lyme disease and association with clinical symptoms.","authors":"Marzieh Keshtkarjahromi, Alison W Rebman, Annukka A R Antar, Yukari C Manabe, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Livia A Casciola-Rosen, John N Aucott, John B Miller","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qcupkk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autoantibodies have been described in the post-infectious state, specifically after Lyme disease and COVID-19. We aimed to describe the prevalence and potential clinical utility of several commercially available autoantibodies after these infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Euroimmun panels (myositis, scleroderma and ANA5) were assayed using sera from patients with Lyme disease with return to health (RTH) (n=70), post-treatment Lyme disease (n=58), COVID-19 RTH (n=47) and post-acute symptoms of COVID-19 (n=22). The post-Lyme questionnaire of symptoms (PLQS) was used to determine symptom burden after Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four groups (p=0.746). A total of 21 different antibodies were found in the Lyme cohorts and 8 different antibodies in the COVID-19 cohorts. The prevalence of scleroderma-associated antibodies was higher after Lyme disease than COVID-19 (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom burden based on antibody status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several autoantibodies were found after Borrelia burgdorferi and SARS-CoV2 infection, although the prevalence was similar in those with persistent symptoms and those who returned to health. While our data show no difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four post-infectious states, we do not imply that autoantibodies are irrelevant in this setting. Rather, this study highlights the need for novel antibody discovery in larger cohorts of well-defined patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qcupkk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Autoantibodies have been described in the post-infectious state, specifically after Lyme disease and COVID-19. We aimed to describe the prevalence and potential clinical utility of several commercially available autoantibodies after these infections.

Methods: Euroimmun panels (myositis, scleroderma and ANA5) were assayed using sera from patients with Lyme disease with return to health (RTH) (n=70), post-treatment Lyme disease (n=58), COVID-19 RTH (n=47) and post-acute symptoms of COVID-19 (n=22). The post-Lyme questionnaire of symptoms (PLQS) was used to determine symptom burden after Lyme disease.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four groups (p=0.746). A total of 21 different antibodies were found in the Lyme cohorts and 8 different antibodies in the COVID-19 cohorts. The prevalence of scleroderma-associated antibodies was higher after Lyme disease than COVID-19 (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom burden based on antibody status.

Conclusions: Several autoantibodies were found after Borrelia burgdorferi and SARS-CoV2 infection, although the prevalence was similar in those with persistent symptoms and those who returned to health. While our data show no difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four post-infectious states, we do not imply that autoantibodies are irrelevant in this setting. Rather, this study highlights the need for novel antibody discovery in larger cohorts of well-defined patient populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱姆病治疗后的自身抗体及其与临床症状的关系。
目的:感染后,特别是莱姆病和COVID-19感染后,自身抗体已被描述。我们旨在描述这些感染后几种市售自身抗体的流行情况和潜在临床用途:使用莱姆病恢复健康(RTH)患者(70 人)、莱姆病治疗后患者(58 人)、COVID-19 RTH 患者(47 人)和 COVID-19 急性症状后患者(22 人)的血清检测欧洲免疫组合(肌炎、硬皮病和 ANA5)。莱姆病后症状问卷(PLQS)用于确定莱姆病后的症状负担:结果:四组患者的自身抗体流行率差异无统计学意义(P=0.746)。莱姆组共发现 21 种不同的抗体,COVID-19 组发现 8 种不同的抗体。莱姆病后硬皮病相关抗体的流行率高于 COVID-19(12.5% 对 2.9%,P=0.026)。基于抗体状态的症状负担差异无统计学意义:结论:鲍氏杆菌和SARS-CoV2感染后发现了多种自身抗体,但在症状持续存在者和恢复健康者中的发生率相似。虽然我们的数据显示感染后的四种状态下自身抗体的流行率没有差异,但我们并不意味着自身抗体在这种情况下无关紧要。相反,这项研究强调了在定义明确的患者群体中发现新型抗体的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
Markedly elevated serum IL-6 levels predict relapse within six months of treatment initiation in Still's disease. Clinical spectrum of small-vessel vasculitis related to cocaine consumption: data from an Italian cohort. Outcome measure in childhood Sjögren's disease: where do we stand? Biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis: a rare coincidence of two diseases at different stages of life. A proposed clinical tool to identify high-risk patients for monogenic lupus: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1