Predictors of complication after groin dissection: a single-centre experience.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.012022
Ghader Jamjoum, Thea Araji, Diana Nguyen, Ari N Meguerditchian
{"title":"Predictors of complication after groin dissection: a single-centre experience.","authors":"Ghader Jamjoum, Thea Araji, Diana Nguyen, Ari N Meguerditchian","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) has historically been associated with substantial morbidity. The objective of this study was to obtain contemporary ILND morbidity rates and to identify potentially preventable risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a retrospective review of medical records for all superficial, deep, and combination groin dissections performed at a single, high-volume academic centre between January 2007 and December 2020. We collected data points for patient, disease, and surgery characteristics, and cancer outcomes. The outcome of interest was any complication within 30 days of surgery. Complications included wound infection, wound necrosis or disruption, seroma, drainage procedure, hematoma, and lymphedema. We performed multivariate logistic regression using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 139 patients having undergone 89 superficial, 12 deep, and 38 combined dissection types, respectively. Melanoma accounted for 84.9% of cases. Of these patients, 56.1% had an adverse postoperative event within 30 days. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and number of positive lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, <i>p</i> = 0.05) were associated with more complications. Patients with deep dissection showed a lower likelihood of complications than those with superficial dissection (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complication rates after ILND remain high. We identified a number of risk factors, providing opportunities for better selection and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E198-E205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) has historically been associated with substantial morbidity. The objective of this study was to obtain contemporary ILND morbidity rates and to identify potentially preventable risk factors.

Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of medical records for all superficial, deep, and combination groin dissections performed at a single, high-volume academic centre between January 2007 and December 2020. We collected data points for patient, disease, and surgery characteristics, and cancer outcomes. The outcome of interest was any complication within 30 days of surgery. Complications included wound infection, wound necrosis or disruption, seroma, drainage procedure, hematoma, and lymphedema. We performed multivariate logistic regression using SAS version 9.4.

Results: We identified 139 patients having undergone 89 superficial, 12 deep, and 38 combined dissection types, respectively. Melanoma accounted for 84.9% of cases. Of these patients, 56.1% had an adverse postoperative event within 30 days. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p < 0.01) and number of positive lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, p = 0.05) were associated with more complications. Patients with deep dissection showed a lower likelihood of complications than those with superficial dissection (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Complication rates after ILND remain high. We identified a number of risk factors, providing opportunities for better selection and prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹股沟切开术后并发症的预测因素:单中心经验。
背景:腹股沟淋巴结切除术(ILND)历来与严重的发病率有关。本研究旨在了解当代 ILND 的发病率,并找出潜在的可预防风险因素:方法:我们对 2007 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一个高容量学术中心进行的所有浅表、深部和联合腹股沟解剖的病历进行了回顾性审查。我们收集了患者、疾病和手术特征以及癌症结果的数据点。我们关注的结果是手术后 30 天内的任何并发症。并发症包括伤口感染、伤口坏死或破损、血清肿、引流手术、血肿和淋巴水肿。我们使用 SAS 9.4 版进行了多变量逻辑回归:我们发现 139 名患者分别接受了 89 次浅层、12 次深层和 38 次联合剖腹手术。黑色素瘤占 84.9%。其中,56.1%的患者在术后 30 天内出现不良反应。年龄越大(几率比 [OR] 1.04,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.01-1.07,P < 0.01)和采集的阳性淋巴结数量越多(OR 1.22,95% CI 1.00-1.50,P = 0.05),并发症越多。深部切除的患者出现并发症的可能性低于浅部切除的患者(OR 0.15,95% CI 0.03-0.84,P <0.05):结论:ILND术后的并发症发生率仍然很高。我们发现了一些风险因素,为更好地选择和预防提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Canadian Spine Society: 24th Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, February 28 - Saturday, March 2, Fairmont Chateau Whistler, Whistler, B.C., Canada. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1