Does open or closed reduction with internal fixation reduces the incidence of complications in neck of femur fractures in pediatrics: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186
Ahmed T Hafez, Mohammed Aly, Islam Omar, George Richardson, Kyle James
{"title":"Does open or closed reduction with internal fixation reduces the incidence of complications in neck of femur fractures in pediatrics: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Ahmed T Hafez, Mohammed Aly, Islam Omar, George Richardson, Kyle James","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neck of femur fracture (FNF) in children is a rare injury with a high incidence of complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN), coxa-vara and nonunion. The aim of this review is to compare the incidence of complications between open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction with internal fixation (CRIF) of FNF in children. Two independent reviewers searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, COCHRANE and PUBMED databases from inception until April 2022 according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Studies included comparison of complications between open and closed approaches with fixation of FNF in patients less than 18 years old. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test while the Newcastle-Ottawa tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 724 hip fractures from 15 included studies received either ORIF or CRIF. Overall, the rate of AVN was approximately 21.7% without statistical significance between both reduction methods [relative risk (RR) = 0.909, using fixed effect model at 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.678-1.217)]. No significant heterogeneity among AVN studies ( I2  = 3.79%, P  = 0.409). Similarly, neither coxa-vara nor nonunion rates were statistically significant in both treatment groups (RR = 0.693 and RR = 0.506, respectively). Coxa-vara studies showed mild heterogeneity ( I2  = 27.8%, P  = 0.218), while significant publication bias was encountered in nonunion studies ( P  = 0.048). No significant difference in the incidence of AVN, coxa-vara and nonunion between ORIF or CRIF of FNF in children. High-quality studies as Randomised Controlled Trials can resolve the inconsistency and heterogeneity of other risk factors including age, initial displacement, fracture type, reduction quality and time to fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neck of femur fracture (FNF) in children is a rare injury with a high incidence of complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN), coxa-vara and nonunion. The aim of this review is to compare the incidence of complications between open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction with internal fixation (CRIF) of FNF in children. Two independent reviewers searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, COCHRANE and PUBMED databases from inception until April 2022 according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Studies included comparison of complications between open and closed approaches with fixation of FNF in patients less than 18 years old. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test while the Newcastle-Ottawa tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 724 hip fractures from 15 included studies received either ORIF or CRIF. Overall, the rate of AVN was approximately 21.7% without statistical significance between both reduction methods [relative risk (RR) = 0.909, using fixed effect model at 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.678-1.217)]. No significant heterogeneity among AVN studies ( I2  = 3.79%, P  = 0.409). Similarly, neither coxa-vara nor nonunion rates were statistically significant in both treatment groups (RR = 0.693 and RR = 0.506, respectively). Coxa-vara studies showed mild heterogeneity ( I2  = 27.8%, P  = 0.218), while significant publication bias was encountered in nonunion studies ( P  = 0.048). No significant difference in the incidence of AVN, coxa-vara and nonunion between ORIF or CRIF of FNF in children. High-quality studies as Randomised Controlled Trials can resolve the inconsistency and heterogeneity of other risk factors including age, initial displacement, fracture type, reduction quality and time to fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放或闭合复位加内固定能否降低儿科股骨颈骨折并发症的发生率:一项荟萃分析和系统综述。
儿童股骨颈骨折(FNF)是一种罕见的损伤,其并发症的发生率很高,如血管性坏死(AVN)、髋臼后凸和不愈合。本综述旨在比较开放复位内固定术(ORIF)和闭合复位内固定术(CRIF)治疗儿童 FNF 的并发症发生率。两位独立审稿人根据系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,检索了从开始到 2022 年 4 月的 EMBASE、MEDLINE、COCHRANE 和 PUBMED 数据库。研究内容包括对18岁以下患者采用开放式和闭合式方法固定FNF的并发症进行比较。采用Egger检验评估发表偏倚,同时使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华工具评估研究的方法学质量。15项纳入研究中共有724例髋部骨折患者接受了ORIF或CRIF治疗。总体而言,AVN的发生率约为21.7%,两种减少方法之间无统计学意义[相对风险(RR)= 0.909,采用固定效应模型,95%置信区间(CI,0.678-1.217)]。AVN 研究之间无明显异质性(I2 = 3.79%,P = 0.409)。同样,在两个治疗组中,Coxa-vara 和非愈合率均无统计学意义(RR = 0.693 和 RR = 0.506)。Coxa-vara研究显示出轻微的异质性(I2 = 27.8%,P = 0.218),而未愈合研究则存在明显的发表偏倚(P = 0.048)。在儿童 FNF 的 ORIF 或 CRIF 中,AVN、髋臼后凸和不愈合的发生率无明显差异。高质量的随机对照试验研究可以解决其他风险因素(包括年龄、初始移位、骨折类型、复位质量和固定时间)的不一致性和异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Dispelling the Dogma: upper-instrumented vertebrae of T5-T6 can achieve similar correction and shoulder balance with less blood loss than T2-T4 in select patients. Outcomes from the urgent assessment pathway in selective ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Management of severe, neglected, bilateral congenital knee dislocation. Certain fracture patterns in children/adolescents would be better called 'Barton equivalent' fractures. Single versus double percutaneous pinning of pediatric distal radius fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1