Establishing a research partnership to investigate functional loss and rehabilitation towards the end of life.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health technology assessment Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3310/PTHC7598
Matthew Maddocks, Lisa Jane Brighton, Louise Connell, Alison Cowley, Barry Laird, Guy Peryer, Carmine Petrasso, Lucy Ziegler, Rowan Harwood
{"title":"Establishing a research partnership to investigate functional loss and rehabilitation towards the end of life.","authors":"Matthew Maddocks, Lisa Jane Brighton, Louise Connell, Alison Cowley, Barry Laird, Guy Peryer, Carmine Petrasso, Lucy Ziegler, Rowan Harwood","doi":"10.3310/PTHC7598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional loss, the inability to perform necessary or desired tasks, is a common consequence of life-limiting illnesses and associated symptoms (pain, fatigue, breathlessness, etc.) and causes suffering for patients and families. Rehabilitation, a set of interventions designed to address functional loss, is recognised as essential within palliative care, as it can improve quality of life and reduce care costs. However, not everyone has equal access to rehabilitation. Despite limited life expectancy or uncertain ability to benefit from interventions, palliative rehabilitation services are often absent. This is partly due to a lack of high-quality research around optimal models of rehabilitation. Research in this area is methodologically challenging and requires multidisciplinary and cross-speciality collaboration.</p><p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>We aimed to establish and grow a United Kingdom research partnership across diverse areas, commencing with partners from Edinburgh, East Anglia, Lancashire, Leeds, London and Nottingham, around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The objectives were to (1) develop a multidisciplinary, cross-speciality research partnership, (2) generate high-priority unanswered research questions with stakeholders, (3) co-design and submit high-quality competitive research proposals, including (4) sharing topic and methodological expertise, and (5) to build capacity and capability to deliver nationally generalisable studies.</p><p><strong>Activities: </strong>The partnership was established with professionals from across England and Scotland with complementary areas of expertise including complex palliative and geriatric research, physiotherapy, nursing, palliative medicine and psychology. Research questions were generated through a modified version of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, which allowed for the collation and refinement of research questions relating to functional loss and rehabilitation towards the end of life. Partnership members were supported through a series of workshops to transform research ideas into proposals for submission to stage one calls by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. The partnership not only supported students, clinicians and public members with training opportunities but also supported clinicians in securing protected time from clinical duties to allow them to focus on developing local research initiatives.</p><p><strong>Reflections: </strong>Through our partnership we established a network that offered researchers, clinicians, students and public members the chance to develop novel skills and explore opportunities for personal and professional development around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The partnership was crucial to foster collaboration and facilitate exchange of ideas, knowledge and experiences to build joint research study proposals.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) programme as award number NIHR135171. A plain language summary of this article is available on the NIHR Journals Library website https://doi.org/10.3310/PTHC7598.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/PTHC7598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional loss, the inability to perform necessary or desired tasks, is a common consequence of life-limiting illnesses and associated symptoms (pain, fatigue, breathlessness, etc.) and causes suffering for patients and families. Rehabilitation, a set of interventions designed to address functional loss, is recognised as essential within palliative care, as it can improve quality of life and reduce care costs. However, not everyone has equal access to rehabilitation. Despite limited life expectancy or uncertain ability to benefit from interventions, palliative rehabilitation services are often absent. This is partly due to a lack of high-quality research around optimal models of rehabilitation. Research in this area is methodologically challenging and requires multidisciplinary and cross-speciality collaboration.

Aim and objectives: We aimed to establish and grow a United Kingdom research partnership across diverse areas, commencing with partners from Edinburgh, East Anglia, Lancashire, Leeds, London and Nottingham, around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The objectives were to (1) develop a multidisciplinary, cross-speciality research partnership, (2) generate high-priority unanswered research questions with stakeholders, (3) co-design and submit high-quality competitive research proposals, including (4) sharing topic and methodological expertise, and (5) to build capacity and capability to deliver nationally generalisable studies.

Activities: The partnership was established with professionals from across England and Scotland with complementary areas of expertise including complex palliative and geriatric research, physiotherapy, nursing, palliative medicine and psychology. Research questions were generated through a modified version of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, which allowed for the collation and refinement of research questions relating to functional loss and rehabilitation towards the end of life. Partnership members were supported through a series of workshops to transform research ideas into proposals for submission to stage one calls by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. The partnership not only supported students, clinicians and public members with training opportunities but also supported clinicians in securing protected time from clinical duties to allow them to focus on developing local research initiatives.

Reflections: Through our partnership we established a network that offered researchers, clinicians, students and public members the chance to develop novel skills and explore opportunities for personal and professional development around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The partnership was crucial to foster collaboration and facilitate exchange of ideas, knowledge and experiences to build joint research study proposals.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) programme as award number NIHR135171. A plain language summary of this article is available on the NIHR Journals Library website https://doi.org/10.3310/PTHC7598.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立研究伙伴关系,调查临终前的功能丧失和康复情况。
背景:功能丧失,即无法完成必要或期望的任务,是局限生命的疾病和相关症状(疼痛、疲劳、呼吸困难等)的常见后果,给患者和家属带来痛苦。康复是一套旨在解决功能丧失问题的干预措施,被认为是姑息关怀中必不可少的,因为它可以提高生活质量,降低关怀成本。然而,并非每个人都能平等地获得康复服务。尽管患者的预期寿命有限,或者无法确定是否能够从干预措施中获益,但姑息康复服务却往往缺失。部分原因是缺乏围绕最佳康复模式的高质量研究。该领域的研究在方法上具有挑战性,需要多学科和跨专业合作:我们的目标是围绕姑息治疗和临终关怀中的功能丧失和康复这一主题领域,与来自爱丁堡、东安格利亚、兰开夏郡、利兹、伦敦和诺丁汉的合作伙伴一起,建立并发展英国不同领域的研究合作关系。其目标是:(1) 建立多学科、跨专业的研究合作伙伴关系;(2) 与利益相关者共同提出高度优先的未决研究问题;(3) 共同设计并提交高质量的竞争性研究提案,包括(4) 分享课题和方法方面的专业知识;(5) 建设在全国范围内开展可推广研究的能力:该合作伙伴关系由来自英格兰和苏格兰的专业人士建立,他们在复杂的姑息治疗和老年病研究、物理治疗、护理、姑息医学和心理学等专业领域具有互补性。研究问题是通过儿童健康与营养研究计划的修订版提出的,该计划允许整理和完善与生命末期功能丧失和康复有关的研究问题。合作成员通过一系列研讨会获得支持,将研究想法转化为提案,提交给国家健康与护理研究所的第一阶段征集活动。该合作伙伴关系不仅为学生、临床医生和公众成员提供了培训机会,而且还为临床医生提供了支持,使他们能够从临床工作中获得受保护的时间,从而能够专注于制定当地的研究计划:通过合作,我们建立了一个网络,为研究人员、临床医生、学生和公众成员提供了发展新技能的机会,并围绕姑息治疗和临终关怀中的功能丧失和康复这一主题领域探索个人和专业发展的机会。这种合作伙伴关系对于促进合作、交流思想、知识和经验,从而制定联合研究计划至关重要:本文介绍了由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)计划资助的独立研究,奖励编号为NIHR135171。本文的简明摘要可在 NIHR 期刊图书馆网站 https://doi.org/10.3310/PTHC7598 上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
期刊最新文献
Early high-dose cryoprecipitate to reduce mortality in adult patients with traumatic haemorrhage: the CRYOSTAT-2 RCT with cost-effectiveness analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests for acute respiratory infection: a systematic review of reviews. The effect of two speech and language approaches on speech problems in people with Parkinson's disease: the PD COMM RCT. Alitretinoin versus phototherapy as the first-line treatment in adults with severe chronic hand eczema: the ALPHA RCT. Transperineal biopsy devices in people with suspected prostate cancer - a systematic review and economic evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1