Raimondo Calvanese, Martina Nesti, Carlo Pignalberi, Pasquale Vergara, Lina Marcantoni, Federico Migliore, Giosuè Mascioli, Raimondo Pittorru, Manuel Antonio Conti, Alessandro Valleggi, Tania Sacco, Francesco Borrello, Amir Kol, Pietro Rossi, Gaetano Thiene, Francesco Zanon
{"title":"[New frontiers in pacing: from myocardial pacing to conduction system pacing].","authors":"Raimondo Calvanese, Martina Nesti, Carlo Pignalberi, Pasquale Vergara, Lina Marcantoni, Federico Migliore, Giosuè Mascioli, Raimondo Pittorru, Manuel Antonio Conti, Alessandro Valleggi, Tania Sacco, Francesco Borrello, Amir Kol, Pietro Rossi, Gaetano Thiene, Francesco Zanon","doi":"10.1714/4252.42296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many years, cardiac pacing has been based on the stimulation of right ventricular common myocardium to correct diseases of the conduction system. The birth and the development of cardiac resynchronization have led to growing interest in the correction and prevention of pacing-induced dyssynchrony. Many observational studies and some randomized clinical trials have shown that conduction system pacing (CSP) can not only prevent pacing-induced dyssynchrony but can also correct proximal conduction system blocks, with reduction of QRS duration and with equal or greater effectiveness than biventricular pacing. Based on these results, many Italian electrophysiologists have changed the stimulation target from the right ventricular common myocardium to CSP. The two techniques with greater clinical impact are the His bundle stimulation and the left bundle branch pacing. The latter, in particular, because of its easier implantation technique and better electric parameters, is spreading like wildfire and is representing a real revolution in the cardiac pacing field. However, despite the growing amount of data, until now, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines give a very limited role to CSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12510,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","volume":"25 5","pages":"327-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1714/4252.42296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For many years, cardiac pacing has been based on the stimulation of right ventricular common myocardium to correct diseases of the conduction system. The birth and the development of cardiac resynchronization have led to growing interest in the correction and prevention of pacing-induced dyssynchrony. Many observational studies and some randomized clinical trials have shown that conduction system pacing (CSP) can not only prevent pacing-induced dyssynchrony but can also correct proximal conduction system blocks, with reduction of QRS duration and with equal or greater effectiveness than biventricular pacing. Based on these results, many Italian electrophysiologists have changed the stimulation target from the right ventricular common myocardium to CSP. The two techniques with greater clinical impact are the His bundle stimulation and the left bundle branch pacing. The latter, in particular, because of its easier implantation technique and better electric parameters, is spreading like wildfire and is representing a real revolution in the cardiac pacing field. However, despite the growing amount of data, until now, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines give a very limited role to CSP.