Different lymphocyte counts of multiple sclerosis patients treated with ofatumumab and ocrelizumab: A retrospective observational study.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2024-05-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735241249644
Christoph Friedli, Nik Krajnc, Helly N Hammer, Stefanie Marti, Tobias Zrzavy, Maria E Evangelopoulos, Ioanna Kapsali, Paulus Rommer, Thomas Berger, Andrew Chan, Gabriel Bsteh, Robert Hoepner
{"title":"Different lymphocyte counts of multiple sclerosis patients treated with ofatumumab and ocrelizumab: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Christoph Friedli, Nik Krajnc, Helly N Hammer, Stefanie Marti, Tobias Zrzavy, Maria E Evangelopoulos, Ioanna Kapsali, Paulus Rommer, Thomas Berger, Andrew Chan, Gabriel Bsteh, Robert Hoepner","doi":"10.1177/11795735241249644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) treated with anti-CD20 (cluster of differentiation) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) show a reduction mainly of B-lymphocytes, but also other lymphocyte subsets can be affected by these treatments. There is limited data on differences between lymphocyte subset counts of pwMS after treatment initiation with OCR or OFA.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare lymphocyte subset counts after treatment initiation in pwMS treated with OCR and OFA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 22 pwMS initiated on OFA and 56 sex-, age- and MS course matched pwMS initiated on OCR from 2 prospectively collected observational MS databases (Bern [n: OFA 14, OCR 44] and Vienna [n: OFA 8, OCR 12]) statistically comparing lymphocyte subset counts (Mann Whitney Test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that pwMS treated with OCR showed a stronger reduction of CD20 B-lymphocytes (<i>P</i> = .001), and a trend towards lower counts of CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells (<i>P</i> = .056) compared to pwMS treated with OFA, whereas reduction of total lymphocyte, CD4<sup>+</sup> lymphocyte and NK cell count was equally distributed between both treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different effects on lymphocyte subpopulations appear to be present in pwMS after treatment initiation with different anti-CD20 mAbs. Further studies are needed to determine potential effects on anti-CD20 treatment efficacy as well as treatment associated risks such as failed vaccinations and infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"11795735241249644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11072073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735241249644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) treated with anti-CD20 (cluster of differentiation) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) show a reduction mainly of B-lymphocytes, but also other lymphocyte subsets can be affected by these treatments. There is limited data on differences between lymphocyte subset counts of pwMS after treatment initiation with OCR or OFA.

Objective: To compare lymphocyte subset counts after treatment initiation in pwMS treated with OCR and OFA.

Methods: We analyzed 22 pwMS initiated on OFA and 56 sex-, age- and MS course matched pwMS initiated on OCR from 2 prospectively collected observational MS databases (Bern [n: OFA 14, OCR 44] and Vienna [n: OFA 8, OCR 12]) statistically comparing lymphocyte subset counts (Mann Whitney Test).

Results: We found that pwMS treated with OCR showed a stronger reduction of CD20 B-lymphocytes (P = .001), and a trend towards lower counts of CD8+ T cells (P = .056) compared to pwMS treated with OFA, whereas reduction of total lymphocyte, CD4+ lymphocyte and NK cell count was equally distributed between both treatments.

Conclusion: Different effects on lymphocyte subpopulations appear to be present in pwMS after treatment initiation with different anti-CD20 mAbs. Further studies are needed to determine potential effects on anti-CD20 treatment efficacy as well as treatment associated risks such as failed vaccinations and infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受ofatumumab和ocrelizumab治疗的多发性硬化症患者的不同淋巴细胞计数:一项回顾性观察研究
简介:接受抗 CD20(分化群)单克隆抗体(mAbs)治疗的多发性硬化症患者(pwMS),如奥克立珠单抗(OCR)和ofatumumab(OFA),主要表现为 B 淋巴细胞减少,但其他淋巴细胞亚群也会受到这些治疗的影响。目前有关接受 OCR 或 OFA 治疗后 pwMS 淋巴细胞亚群计数差异的数据有限:比较接受 OCR 和 OFA 治疗的 pwMS 在开始治疗后的淋巴细胞亚群计数:我们分析了22名接受OFA治疗的pwMS和56名接受OCR治疗的与性别、年龄和MS病程相匹配的pwMS,这些pwMS来自2个前瞻性收集的MS观察数据库(伯尔尼[n: OFA 14, OCR 44]和维也纳[n: OFA 8, OCR 12]),我们通过统计学方法比较了淋巴细胞亚群计数(曼惠特尼检验):结果:我们发现,与接受 OFA 治疗的 pwMS 相比,接受 OCR 治疗的 pwMS 的 CD20 B 淋巴细胞减少幅度更大(P = .001),CD8+ T 细胞数量呈下降趋势(P = .056),而总淋巴细胞、CD4+ 淋巴细胞和 NK 细胞数量的减少幅度在两种治疗方法中分布相当:结论:用不同的抗 CD20 mAbs 开始治疗后,似乎对 pwMS 的淋巴细胞亚群有不同的影响。需要进一步研究以确定对抗 CD20 治疗效果的潜在影响以及治疗相关风险,如疫苗接种失败和感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enriched environment may improve secondary brain injury after traumatic brain injury by regulating the TLR2/NF-κB signaling pathway. Letter re: Aseptic pleocytosis can only be classified as a phenotypic manifestation of MNGIE after exclusion of all differential causes. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis. Hemorrhagic stroke in children. Measurement of cerebral venous oxygenation with quantitative susceptibility mapping after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1