Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-472
Georg Marckmann, Thomas Pollmächer
{"title":"Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations.","authors":"Georg Marckmann, Thomas Pollmächer","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persons with mental disorders have the same right to self-determination as patients with somatic diseases, also regarding death and dying. However, there are several challenges that render persons with mental disorders especially vulnerable to inappropriate conduct of assisted suicide: their wish to die may be a symptom of their mental disease and not an autonomous choice, decision-making competence may be compromised by their illness and more difficult to assess, the severity of suffering may be more difficult to evaluate from an external perspective, the wish to die may be more variable over time and the prognostic uncertainty in mental illness makes it more difficult to determine whether the severe suffering is, in fact, treatment-resistant. After reviewing the clinical and ethical background of assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders, we assess each of these challenges to a medically and ethically justified practice of assisted suicide in mentally ill persons, based on relevant clinical and ethical literature. We conclude that the only ethically valid argument to exclude persons with mental disorders from suicide assistance is their potential inability to make a free, autonomous decision. However, the mentioned challenges should be taken into account in evaluating a person's request for assisted suicide and for promoting her well-informed and deliberated decision-making. In addition to assessing the person's decision-making capacity, the evaluation process should be guided by the goal to empower the person to make an autonomous choice between the available options. We conclude the paper with perspectives for a clinically and ethically justified practice of evaluating requests for assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"708-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persons with mental disorders have the same right to self-determination as patients with somatic diseases, also regarding death and dying. However, there are several challenges that render persons with mental disorders especially vulnerable to inappropriate conduct of assisted suicide: their wish to die may be a symptom of their mental disease and not an autonomous choice, decision-making competence may be compromised by their illness and more difficult to assess, the severity of suffering may be more difficult to evaluate from an external perspective, the wish to die may be more variable over time and the prognostic uncertainty in mental illness makes it more difficult to determine whether the severe suffering is, in fact, treatment-resistant. After reviewing the clinical and ethical background of assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders, we assess each of these challenges to a medically and ethically justified practice of assisted suicide in mentally ill persons, based on relevant clinical and ethical literature. We conclude that the only ethically valid argument to exclude persons with mental disorders from suicide assistance is their potential inability to make a free, autonomous decision. However, the mentioned challenges should be taken into account in evaluating a person's request for assisted suicide and for promoting her well-informed and deliberated decision-making. In addition to assessing the person's decision-making capacity, the evaluation process should be guided by the goal to empower the person to make an autonomous choice between the available options. We conclude the paper with perspectives for a clinically and ethically justified practice of evaluating requests for assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神失常者的协助自杀:临床伦理论点和建议综述。
精神障碍患者与躯体疾病患者一样,在死亡和临终方面享有同样的自决权。然而,有几项挑战使得精神障碍患者特别容易受到不适当的协助自杀行为的影响:他们的死亡愿望可能是其精神疾病的症状,而不是自主选择;决策能力可能因其疾病而受到影响,并且更难评估;痛苦的严重程度可能更难从外部角度进行评估;死亡愿望可能随着时间的推移而更加多变;精神疾病的预后不确定性使得更难确定严重的痛苦实际上是否是治疗抵抗。在回顾了精神障碍患者协助自杀的临床和伦理背景之后,我们根据相关的临床和伦理文献,对精神病患者协助自杀在医学和伦理上的合理性所面临的挑战逐一进行了评估。我们的结论是,将精神障碍患者排除在自杀协助之外的唯一符合伦理的论据是,他们可能无法做出自由、自主的决定。然而,在评估一个人的协助自杀请求和促进她在充分知情和深思熟虑的情况下作出决定时,应考虑到上述挑战。除了评估当事人的决策能力外,评估过程还应以增强当事人在现有选择中自主做出选择的能力为目标。最后,我们将从临床和伦理角度出发,对精神障碍患者的协助自杀请求进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis. Palliative care and hepatobiliary malignancies: say no to late referral. Stepped palliative care: considerations for equitable implementation. Breast cancer survivorship care: a narrative review of challenges and future directions. Surveillance of patients after palliative radiation, how to make it feasible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1