The efficacy of taping on elbow proprioception in healthy individuals: A single-blinded randomized placebo-controlled study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.014
Kevser Sevik Kacmaz PT, PhD , Bayram Unver PhD, PT, Prof.
{"title":"The efficacy of taping on elbow proprioception in healthy individuals: A single-blinded randomized placebo-controlled study","authors":"Kevser Sevik Kacmaz PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Bayram Unver PhD, PT, Prof.","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Taping stimulates the mechanoreceptors, increases sensory information to the central nervous system, and improves sensorimotor synchronization, resulting in improved motor control. However, the efficacy of taping on elbow proprioception is not clear.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of taping on elbow proprioception in healthy individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This study was a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty six healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to kinesio taping (<em>n</em> = 27) or sham taping (<em>n</em> = 29). Active joint position sense error (JPSE) was used to quantify proprioception using a universal goniometer at three-time points: baseline (BS), immediately after taping (IA), and 30 minutes after taping (30MA), with the tape still in place at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion. Participants were blinded to group assignments. The Friedman analysis assessed differences between evaluations within groups, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test determined differences between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study was completed with 56 participants and there were no dropouts. No skin reaction or adverse effect was observed in the participants and no test trial was excluded. The baseline scores of the groups were similar (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). A significant difference was detected in the study group after kinesio taping at 70° (MD = −1.22; CI = (−2.33: −0.10; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.005; <em>d</em> = 0.653) and 110° of elbow flexion (MD = −1.34; CI = 2,47: −0,21; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.005; <em>d</em> = 0.73). This statistically significant difference was observed even at the 30MA evaluations at 70° (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Also, there was a statistically insignificant tendency to decrease in JPSE of both groups at both degrees following taping.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Elbow proprioception may be enhanced by kinesio taping, and this effect could last up to 30 minutes at 70° of elbow flexion. In contrast, sham taping did not produce such an improvement. Based on the differences in JPSE, kinesio taping proved more effective and had a longer-lasting impact than the sham application. The statistically insignificant tendency to decrease in JPSE may indicate that the 30-minute application period is inadequate to create a statistically significant effect on elbow proprioception. Longer usage periods can better reveal the effects of orthoses on proprioception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113024000292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Taping stimulates the mechanoreceptors, increases sensory information to the central nervous system, and improves sensorimotor synchronization, resulting in improved motor control. However, the efficacy of taping on elbow proprioception is not clear.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of taping on elbow proprioception in healthy individuals.

Study design

This study was a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.

Methods

Fifty six healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to kinesio taping (n = 27) or sham taping (n = 29). Active joint position sense error (JPSE) was used to quantify proprioception using a universal goniometer at three-time points: baseline (BS), immediately after taping (IA), and 30 minutes after taping (30MA), with the tape still in place at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion. Participants were blinded to group assignments. The Friedman analysis assessed differences between evaluations within groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test determined differences between groups.

Results

The study was completed with 56 participants and there were no dropouts. No skin reaction or adverse effect was observed in the participants and no test trial was excluded. The baseline scores of the groups were similar (p > 0.05). A significant difference was detected in the study group after kinesio taping at 70° (MD = −1.22; CI = (−2.33: −0.10; p < 0.005; d = 0.653) and 110° of elbow flexion (MD = −1.34; CI = 2,47: −0,21; p < 0.005; d = 0.73). This statistically significant difference was observed even at the 30MA evaluations at 70° (p < 0.05). Also, there was a statistically insignificant tendency to decrease in JPSE of both groups at both degrees following taping.

Conclusions

Elbow proprioception may be enhanced by kinesio taping, and this effect could last up to 30 minutes at 70° of elbow flexion. In contrast, sham taping did not produce such an improvement. Based on the differences in JPSE, kinesio taping proved more effective and had a longer-lasting impact than the sham application. The statistically insignificant tendency to decrease in JPSE may indicate that the 30-minute application period is inadequate to create a statistically significant effect on elbow proprioception. Longer usage periods can better reveal the effects of orthoses on proprioception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绑带对健康人肘部本体感觉的疗效:单盲随机安慰剂对照研究。
背景:绑带可刺激机械感受器,增加传至中枢神经系统的感觉信息,提高感觉运动的同步性,从而改善运动控制。目的:本研究旨在评估绑带对健康人肘部本体感觉的直接影响:研究设计:本研究是一项双臂、平行组、随机对照、单盲研究,采用假应用:方法:56 名健康成年人按 1:1 随机接受肌动蛋白贴敷(27 人)或假贴敷(29 人)。在三个时间点:基线(BS)、绑带后立即(IA)和绑带后 30 分钟(30MA),在肘关节屈曲 70° 和 110° 时绑带仍在原位的情况下,使用通用动态关节角度计量化本体感觉的主动关节位置感误差(JPSE)。参与者的分组均为盲组。弗里德曼分析评估了组内评估之间的差异,曼-惠特尼U检验确定了组间差异:结果:56 名参与者完成了研究,没有人退出。参与者未出现皮肤反应或不良反应,也未排除任何测试试验。各组的基线分数相似(P>0.05)。研究组在 70° 角处进行肌动贴绑后发现有明显差异(MD = -1.22; CI = (-2.33: -0.10; p 结论:肘关节本体感觉可能会增强:肘关节本体感觉可通过肌动蛋白贴敷得到增强,在肘关节屈曲 70°的情况下,这种效果可持续 30 分钟。相比之下,假性绑带不会产生这种改善效果。根据 JPSE 的差异,事实证明,与假性贴敷相比,肌动贴敷更有效,效果更持久。在统计学上,JPSE 下降的趋势并不明显,这可能表明 30 分钟的贴敷时间不足以对肘部本体感觉产生统计学意义上的影响。更长的使用时间可以更好地揭示矫形器对本体感觉的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model. Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1