Costs Saved by Visiting a Nurse-Led Primary Care Facility Comparison of Primary Care Models.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/15271544241247767
Loren P Wagner PhD, Bev Zabler PhD Rn
{"title":"Costs Saved by Visiting a Nurse-Led Primary Care Facility Comparison of Primary Care Models.","authors":"Loren P Wagner PhD, Bev Zabler PhD Rn","doi":"10.1177/15271544241247767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurse-led primary care is a relatively rare model for primary care, but given nurses more holistic approach to medicine, can prove effective in both reducing costs and disparities in access and outcomes. The present study compares cost adjusted quality of care between a nurse-led primary care facility and the standard primary care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>To compare the cost adjusted quality of care between the standard primary care model and a nurse led primary care model the outcomes from a population of patients that visited each (control and experimental, respectively) are compared with respect to three complications of hypertension (stroke, heart attack, and coronary heart disease).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The number of three complications (stroke, heart attack, and coronary artery disease) from hypertension for the experimental population is estimated using time-to-event distributions estimated from the control population. Costs are estimated using the control population data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It is found that the population that visited the nurse-led primary care facility had better cost adjusted outcomes than the population that visited the physician led facilities. We can attribute, at least, $3.7 million in costs not realized due to the quality of care provided by the nursing center.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-led primary care is one way that the U.S. healthcare system could reduce costs while providing consistent quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544241247767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurse-led primary care is a relatively rare model for primary care, but given nurses more holistic approach to medicine, can prove effective in both reducing costs and disparities in access and outcomes. The present study compares cost adjusted quality of care between a nurse-led primary care facility and the standard primary care.

Design: To compare the cost adjusted quality of care between the standard primary care model and a nurse led primary care model the outcomes from a population of patients that visited each (control and experimental, respectively) are compared with respect to three complications of hypertension (stroke, heart attack, and coronary heart disease).

Method: The number of three complications (stroke, heart attack, and coronary artery disease) from hypertension for the experimental population is estimated using time-to-event distributions estimated from the control population. Costs are estimated using the control population data.

Results: It is found that the population that visited the nurse-led primary care facility had better cost adjusted outcomes than the population that visited the physician led facilities. We can attribute, at least, $3.7 million in costs not realized due to the quality of care provided by the nursing center.

Conclusion: Nurse-led primary care is one way that the U.S. healthcare system could reduce costs while providing consistent quality of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
到护士领导的初级保健机构就诊所节省的费用 初级保健模式比较。
导言:以护士为主导的初级保健是一种相对罕见的初级保健模式,但由于护士采用了更全面的医疗方法,因此可以有效降低成本,减少就医机会和结果方面的差异。本研究比较了以护士为主导的初级医疗机构和标准初级医疗机构的成本调整后医疗质量:为了比较标准初级医疗模式和护士主导初级医疗模式的成本调整后医疗质量,我们比较了就诊患者(分别为对照组和实验组)在三种高血压并发症(中风、心脏病发作和冠心病)方面的结果:方法:根据对照组人群的时间-事件分布估算实验组人群高血压三种并发症(中风、心脏病和冠心病)的数量。使用对照人群的数据估算成本:结果:我们发现,到护士领导的初级保健机构就诊的人群比到医生领导的机构就诊的人群有更好的成本调整结果。由于护理中心提供的护理质量,我们至少可以归因于 370 万美元的成本没有实现:护士主导的初级医疗是美国医疗系统在提供稳定的医疗质量的同时降低成本的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Racism and Redlining in the History of Psychiatric Policy and Practice in Atlanta: Implications for Nursing. Xylazine in the Unregulated Drug Market: An Integrative Review of Its Prevalence, Health Impacts, and Detection and Intervention Challenges in the United States. Overcoming Barriers to Healthcare Reform: A Call to Action. Barriers and Enablers of Successful Workplace Integration of Internationally Educated Nurses (IENs) in a Host Country: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Corrigendum to "Advocacy, Research, and Anesthesia Practice Models: Key Studies of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1