Volumetric Analysis of a Novel Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1055/a-2320-5489
Nicole R Van Spronsen, Jacob B Hammond, Alexander T Plonkowski, Clint E Jokerst, Jonathan A Flug, Max A Shrout, Edward M Reece, William J Casey, Alanna M Rebecca
{"title":"Volumetric Analysis of a Novel Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap.","authors":"Nicole R Van Spronsen, Jacob B Hammond, Alexander T Plonkowski, Clint E Jokerst, Jonathan A Flug, Max A Shrout, Edward M Reece, William J Casey, Alanna M Rebecca","doi":"10.1055/a-2320-5489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The presence of a chimeric gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with a common arterial pedicle has been demonstrated on computed tomography angiography in up to 59% of patients and confirmed in a cadaveric model. Already utilized for head and neck reconstruction by Heredero et al, this novel flap could provide more volume than either flap alone which is advantageous, particularly in patients with sizable defects. The purpose of this study was to determine the average tissue volume that can be utilized from this chimeric flap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> CT Angiogram imaging studies exhibiting chimeric flap anatomy were reviewed over a 7-year period at a single institution utilizing Visage Version 7.1, a radiology picture archiving and communication system. This software was used to trace the flap pedicles and to capture estimated soft tissue volumes of each respective flap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 31 patients, consisting of 52 lower extremity gracilis and PAP chimeric flaps, underwent tissue volume analysis. The average total volume of soft tissue supplied by the gracilis flap was found to be 70.21 cm<sup>3</sup> (standard deviation [SD] = 26.99). The average volume of the PAP flap was 31.73 cm<sup>3</sup> (SD = 26.12). The average total volume captured by the chimeric gracilis and PAP flap was 101.94 cm<sup>3</sup> (SD = 62.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The potential soft tissue volume that can be harvested from a chimeric gracilis and PAP flap is significantly greater than solitary gracilis or PAP flaps. This chimeric flap may serve as a viable and advantageous reconstructive option for patients requiring large volume soft tissue coverage, particularly if other sizable options are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2320-5489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The presence of a chimeric gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with a common arterial pedicle has been demonstrated on computed tomography angiography in up to 59% of patients and confirmed in a cadaveric model. Already utilized for head and neck reconstruction by Heredero et al, this novel flap could provide more volume than either flap alone which is advantageous, particularly in patients with sizable defects. The purpose of this study was to determine the average tissue volume that can be utilized from this chimeric flap.

Methods:  CT Angiogram imaging studies exhibiting chimeric flap anatomy were reviewed over a 7-year period at a single institution utilizing Visage Version 7.1, a radiology picture archiving and communication system. This software was used to trace the flap pedicles and to capture estimated soft tissue volumes of each respective flap.

Results:  A total of 31 patients, consisting of 52 lower extremity gracilis and PAP chimeric flaps, underwent tissue volume analysis. The average total volume of soft tissue supplied by the gracilis flap was found to be 70.21 cm3 (standard deviation [SD] = 26.99). The average volume of the PAP flap was 31.73 cm3 (SD = 26.12). The average total volume captured by the chimeric gracilis and PAP flap was 101.94 cm3 (SD = 62.40).

Conclusion:  The potential soft tissue volume that can be harvested from a chimeric gracilis and PAP flap is significantly greater than solitary gracilis or PAP flaps. This chimeric flap may serve as a viable and advantageous reconstructive option for patients requiring large volume soft tissue coverage, particularly if other sizable options are not available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定新型大腿内侧皮瓣的大小:腕骨和深动脉穿孔瓣嵌合的综合容积分析。
背景:计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)显示,59%的患者存在腓肠肌和深动脉穿孔带(PAP)嵌合皮瓣,并在尸体模型中得到证实1,2。Heredero 等人已将这种新型皮瓣用于头颈部重建,与单独使用其中一种皮瓣相比,这种皮瓣能提供更多的组织量,尤其是对有较大缺损的患者更有优势3:方法:在一家医疗机构,利用放射图片存档和通信系统(PACS)Visage 7.1 版,对 7 年来显示嵌合皮瓣解剖结构的 CT 血管造影成像研究进行了审查。该软件用于追踪皮瓣蒂,并获取每个皮瓣的估计软组织体积:共有31名患者接受了组织体积分析,其中包括52个下肢腓肠肌瓣和PAP嵌合瓣。结果发现,腓骨肌皮瓣提供的软组织平均总体积为 70.21 立方厘米(SD=26.99)。PAP皮瓣的平均体积为31.73立方厘米(标准差=26.12)。嵌合腕骨瓣和PAP瓣的平均总容积为101.94立方厘米(标准差=62.40):结论:从腓肠肌瓣和腹股沟瓣嵌合瓣中可获取的潜在软组织体积明显大于单独的腓肠肌瓣或腹股沟瓣。对于需要大体积软组织覆盖的患者来说,这种嵌合瓣可能是一种可行且有利的重建选择,尤其是在没有其他大体积选择的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature. Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Modern High-Volume Microsurgery Center. Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020. Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery-vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Anatomical Study. DIEP Donor Site Satisfaction between Patients with and without History of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1