Proceedings of the 2023 Viral Clearance Symposium, Session 6: Viral Inactivation.

Junfen Ma, David Roush
{"title":"Proceedings of the 2023 Viral Clearance Symposium, Session 6: Viral Inactivation.","authors":"Junfen Ma, David Roush","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024.002246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of detergents or low pH hold are commonly employed techniques in biologics downstream processing to inactivate enveloped viruses. These approaches have been demonstrated to be robust and are detailed in ASTM E2888 (low pH) and ASTM E3042-16 (Triton X-100), accordingly. One of the recent challenges is the need for a replacement of Triton X-100 with a more environmentally friendly detergent with similar log10 reduction value (LRV) achieved. The presentations in this session focused on a detailed assessment of a range of detergents. The most well characterized and potentially robust detergents identified were TDAO (n-Tetradecyl-N,N-dimethylamine-N-oxide) and Simulsol SL 11 W. Key performance factors assessed (in direct comparison with the industry standard Triton X-100) were viral inactivation kinetics (total elapsed time to achieve equilibrium), LRV achieved of enveloped viruses, toxicity, potential impact on product quality and process performance, clearance of residual detergent in subsequent downstream steps, assays to support assessment with appropriate limit of quantification, and commercial supply of detergent of the appropriate quality standard. Both TDAO and Simulsol SL11 had similar overall LRV as Triton-100. In addition, for the low pH viral inactivation, reduced LRV was observed at pH > 3.70 and low salt concentration (outside of the ASTM range), which is a cautionary note when applying low pH inactivation to labile proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"78 2","pages":"187-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.002246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of detergents or low pH hold are commonly employed techniques in biologics downstream processing to inactivate enveloped viruses. These approaches have been demonstrated to be robust and are detailed in ASTM E2888 (low pH) and ASTM E3042-16 (Triton X-100), accordingly. One of the recent challenges is the need for a replacement of Triton X-100 with a more environmentally friendly detergent with similar log10 reduction value (LRV) achieved. The presentations in this session focused on a detailed assessment of a range of detergents. The most well characterized and potentially robust detergents identified were TDAO (n-Tetradecyl-N,N-dimethylamine-N-oxide) and Simulsol SL 11 W. Key performance factors assessed (in direct comparison with the industry standard Triton X-100) were viral inactivation kinetics (total elapsed time to achieve equilibrium), LRV achieved of enveloped viruses, toxicity, potential impact on product quality and process performance, clearance of residual detergent in subsequent downstream steps, assays to support assessment with appropriate limit of quantification, and commercial supply of detergent of the appropriate quality standard. Both TDAO and Simulsol SL11 had similar overall LRV as Triton-100. In addition, for the low pH viral inactivation, reduced LRV was observed at pH > 3.70 and low salt concentration (outside of the ASTM range), which is a cautionary note when applying low pH inactivation to labile proteins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023 年病毒清除研讨会论文集,第 6 单元:病毒灭活。
使用洗涤剂或低 pH 值保持是生物制品下游加工中常用的灭活包膜病毒的技术。这些方法已被证明是可靠的,并在 ASTM E2888(低 pH 值)和 ASTM E3042-16(Triton X-100)中作了详细说明。最近面临的挑战之一是需要用一种更环保的洗涤剂来替代 Triton X-100,并实现类似的 log10 降低值 (LRV)。本次会议的发言侧重于对一系列洗涤剂的详细评估。其中特征最明显、最具潜力的洗涤剂是 TDAO(正十四烷基-N,N-二甲胺-N-氧化物)和 Simulsol SL 11 W。评估的关键性能因素(与行业标准 Triton X-100 直接比较)包括病毒灭活动力学(达到平衡所需的总时间)、包膜病毒的 LRV 值、毒性、对产品质量和工艺性能的潜在影响、后续下游步骤中残留洗涤剂的清除、支持适当定量限评估的检测方法以及适当质量标准洗涤剂的商业供应。TDAO 和 Simulsol SL11 的总体 LRV 与 Triton-100 相似。此外,在低 pH 值病毒灭活中,当 pH 值大于 3.70 和盐浓度较低时(超出 ASTM 范围),LRV 值会降低,这在对易变蛋白质采用低 pH 值灭活时值得注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1