Predicting survival in locally advanced gastric cancer using prognostic factors - neoadjuvant rectal score and downstaging depth score.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-01
S Tamam, S Culcu, K Erözkan, M Ş Benk, C Azılı, E Altınsoy, Ş Ersöz, A E Unal
{"title":"Predicting survival in locally advanced gastric cancer using prognostic factors - neoadjuvant rectal score and downstaging depth score.","authors":"S Tamam, S Culcu, K Erözkan, M Ş Benk, C Azılı, E Altınsoy, Ş Ersöz, A E Unal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical prediction models are needed to accurately predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who have received neoadjuvant therapy and to determine the best treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to determine the role of two prognostic factors, the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and the downstaging depth score (DDS), in predicting survival in patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent curative gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of 129 patients who had been diagnosed with primary gastric cancer and underwent radical gastrectomy after receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We calculated the NAR score and DDS values for each patient and conducted a survival analysis to assess the accuracy of these prognostic factors in predicting overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival time of the patients was found to be 29 months. Patients with low NAR scores and high DDS had significantly longer overall survival. Univariate analyses based on clinical and laboratory characteristics showed that gender, surgery type, resection type, neural invasion, grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, lymphocyte level, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, NAR score, and DDS were associated with survival. Moreover, multivariate analyses showed that lymphocyte level, DDS, and NAR score were independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, our research indicates that NAR score and DDS may serve as useful prognostic markers for predicting overall survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Patients with high DDS and low NAR scores were found to have better prognoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":"72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical prediction models are needed to accurately predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who have received neoadjuvant therapy and to determine the best treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to determine the role of two prognostic factors, the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and the downstaging depth score (DDS), in predicting survival in patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent curative gastrectomy.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 129 patients who had been diagnosed with primary gastric cancer and underwent radical gastrectomy after receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We calculated the NAR score and DDS values for each patient and conducted a survival analysis to assess the accuracy of these prognostic factors in predicting overall survival.

Results: The median overall survival time of the patients was found to be 29 months. Patients with low NAR scores and high DDS had significantly longer overall survival. Univariate analyses based on clinical and laboratory characteristics showed that gender, surgery type, resection type, neural invasion, grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, lymphocyte level, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, NAR score, and DDS were associated with survival. Moreover, multivariate analyses showed that lymphocyte level, DDS, and NAR score were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion: In summary, our research indicates that NAR score and DDS may serve as useful prognostic markers for predicting overall survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Patients with high DDS and low NAR scores were found to have better prognoses.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用预后因素--新辅助直肠评分和分期深度评分--预测局部晚期胃癌患者的生存率。
背景:需要临床预测模型来准确预测接受新辅助治疗的胃癌患者的预后,并确定最佳治疗策略。本研究旨在确定新辅助直肠(NAR)评分和分期深度评分(DDS)这两个预后因素在预测接受新辅助治疗并接受根治性胃切除术的胃癌患者生存率方面的作用:我们回顾了 129 名确诊为原发性胃癌并在接受新辅助治疗后接受根治性胃切除术的患者的病历。我们计算了每位患者的 NAR 评分和 DDS 值,并进行了生存分析,以评估这些预后因素在预测总生存期方面的准确性:结果:患者的中位总生存期为 29 个月。NAR评分低和DDS高的患者总生存期明显更长。基于临床和实验室特征的单变量分析显示,性别、手术类型、切除类型、神经侵犯、分级、辅助放疗、淋巴细胞水平、癌胚抗原(CEA)水平、NAR评分和DDS与生存率有关。此外,多变量分析表明,淋巴细胞水平、DDS和NAR评分是独立的预后因素:总之,我们的研究表明,NAR评分和DDS可作为预测接受新辅助化疗和根治性手术的局部晚期胃癌患者总生存期的有用预后指标。高DDS和低NAR评分的患者预后较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
A case report on lingual schwannoma. Adult small bowel volvulus - a case series. Can we trust the data? - the data detective. Endoscopy-induced complication of barotrauma with concomitant benign pneumoperitoneum. Late presentation of Bochdalek hernia in children - experience at a single centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1