A new configuration of lateral-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A biomechanical analysis.

Fuat Bilgili, Mehmet Demirel, Fevzi Birişik, Halil İbrahim Balcı, Emin Sunbuloglu, Ergun Bozdag
{"title":"A new configuration of lateral-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A biomechanical analysis.","authors":"Fuat Bilgili, Mehmet Demirel, Fevzi Birişik, Halil İbrahim Balcı, Emin Sunbuloglu, Ergun Bozdag","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare a new lateral-pinning technique, in which pins engage the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus in a divergent configuration in both the axial and sagittal planes instead of the coronal plane, with the cross-pin, and with 2 and 3 coronally divergent lateral-pin techniques in a synthetic humerus model of supracondylar humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six identical synthetic models of the humerus simulating a standardized supracondylar humerus fracture were included in this study. They were divided into 4 groups based on the pin configuration of fixation: the new 3-lateral pin-fixation technique (group A), 2 crossed pins (group B), 3 divergent lateral pins (group C), and 2 divergent lateral pins (group D). Each model was subjected to combined axial and torsional loading, and then torsional stability and torsional stiffness (Nmm/°) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A had greater rotational stability than groups C and D but had no statistically significant additional rotational stability compared with group B (P=.042, P=.008, P=.648, respectively), whereas group B had greater rotational stability than only group D (P=.020). Furthermore, group A demonstrated higher internal rotational stiffness compared with groups C and D (P=.038, P=.006, respectively). Group B had better internal rotational stiffness than group D (P=.015). There was no significant difference in internal rotational stiffness between groups A and B (P=. 542), groups B and C (P=.804), and groups D and C (P=.352). Although no statistically significant differences existed between groups A and B, the modified pin configuration exhibited the highest torsional stability and stiffness. Group D showed the lowest values in all biomechanical properties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown us that this new lateral-pinning technique may provide torsional resistance to internal rotational displacement as strong as the standard technique of crossed-pin configuration of fixation. Furthermore, with this new pin configuration, greater torsional resistance can be obtained than with either the standard 2- or the standard 3-lateral divergent pin configuration. Cite this article as: Bilgili F, Demirel M, Birişik F, Balcı Hİ, Sunbuloglu E, Bozdag E. A new configuration of lateral-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A biomechanical analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2023 10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091 [Epub Ahead of Print].</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare a new lateral-pinning technique, in which pins engage the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus in a divergent configuration in both the axial and sagittal planes instead of the coronal plane, with the cross-pin, and with 2 and 3 coronally divergent lateral-pin techniques in a synthetic humerus model of supracondylar humerus fractures.

Methods: Thirty-six identical synthetic models of the humerus simulating a standardized supracondylar humerus fracture were included in this study. They were divided into 4 groups based on the pin configuration of fixation: the new 3-lateral pin-fixation technique (group A), 2 crossed pins (group B), 3 divergent lateral pins (group C), and 2 divergent lateral pins (group D). Each model was subjected to combined axial and torsional loading, and then torsional stability and torsional stiffness (Nmm/°) were recorded.

Results: Group A had greater rotational stability than groups C and D but had no statistically significant additional rotational stability compared with group B (P=.042, P=.008, P=.648, respectively), whereas group B had greater rotational stability than only group D (P=.020). Furthermore, group A demonstrated higher internal rotational stiffness compared with groups C and D (P=.038, P=.006, respectively). Group B had better internal rotational stiffness than group D (P=.015). There was no significant difference in internal rotational stiffness between groups A and B (P=. 542), groups B and C (P=.804), and groups D and C (P=.352). Although no statistically significant differences existed between groups A and B, the modified pin configuration exhibited the highest torsional stability and stiffness. Group D showed the lowest values in all biomechanical properties.

Conclusion: This study has shown us that this new lateral-pinning technique may provide torsional resistance to internal rotational displacement as strong as the standard technique of crossed-pin configuration of fixation. Furthermore, with this new pin configuration, greater torsional resistance can be obtained than with either the standard 2- or the standard 3-lateral divergent pin configuration. Cite this article as: Bilgili F, Demirel M, Birişik F, Balcı Hİ, Sunbuloglu E, Bozdag E. A new configuration of lateral-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A biomechanical analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2023 10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091 [Epub Ahead of Print].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿肱骨髁上骨折外侧针固定的新结构:生物力学分析
研究目的本研究的目的是在肱骨髁上骨折的合成肱骨模型中,比较一种新的侧向打针技术(打针针在轴向和矢状面上而不是冠状面上以发散配置与肱骨远端内侧和外侧柱接触)与交叉打针技术,以及 2 和 3 个冠状发散侧向打针技术的生物力学效果:本研究包括 36 个相同的肱骨合成模型,模拟标准化的肱骨髁上骨折。根据固定针的配置将其分为 4 组:新型 3 侧针固定技术(A 组)、2 根交叉针(B 组)、3 根分歧侧针(C 组)和 2 根分歧侧针(D 组)。对每个模型进行轴向和扭转联合加载,然后记录扭转稳定性和扭转刚度(Nmm/°):结果:与 C 组和 D 组相比,A 组具有更高的旋转稳定性,但与 B 组相比,A 组的旋转稳定性没有明显增加(分别为 P=.042、P=.008、P=.648),而 B 组仅比 D 组具有更高的旋转稳定性(P=.020)。此外,与 C 组和 D 组相比,A 组的内旋转刚度更高(分别为 P=.038 和 P=.006)。B 组的内旋转硬度高于 D 组(P=.015)。A 组和 B 组(P=.542)、B 组和 C 组(P=.804)以及 D 组和 C 组(P=.352)之间的内旋转刚度无明显差异。虽然 A 组和 B 组之间不存在统计学上的显著差异,但改良销钉结构的扭转稳定性和刚度最高。D 组的所有生物力学特性值最低:这项研究向我们表明,这种新的侧位固定技术可以提供与标准的交叉针固定技术一样强的抗内旋位移扭转能力。此外,与标准的双侧或三侧发散针结构相比,这种新的针结构可以获得更大的抗扭转能力。本文引用如前:Bilgili F, Demirel M, Birişik F, Balcı Hİ, Sunbuloglu E, Bozdag E. 小儿肱骨髁上骨折外侧针固定新结构:生物力学分析。Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2023 10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091 [Epub Ahead of Print].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of spinopelvic relationship among Turkish orthopedic surgeons in total joint replacement: a survey. Asymptomatic iatrogenic bilateral occlusion of vertebral artery after atlantoaxial fusion: a case report. Bibliometric analysis of the Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica from 2013 to 2022. Comparison of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and mosaicplasty in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus. Comparison of mechanical stability of modified pedicle screw fixator and unilateral lumbopelvic fixation for treating sacroiliac joint disruption: A finite element analysis study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1