Association of biomarkers with successful ventilatory weaning in COVID-19 patients: an observational study.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-04-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240158-en
Bruna Schneider, Raquel Almeida de Oliveira, Gilberto Friedman, Rafael Barberena Moraes
{"title":"Association of biomarkers with successful ventilatory weaning in COVID-19 patients: an observational study.","authors":"Bruna Schneider, Raquel Almeida de Oliveira, Gilberto Friedman, Rafael Barberena Moraes","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240158-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of biomarkers with successful ventilatory weaning in COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, retrospective, and single-center study was conducted between March 2020 and April 2021. C-reactive protein, total lymphocytes, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were evaluated during attrition and extubation, and the variation in these biomarker values was measured. The primary outcome was successful extubation. ROC curves were drawn to find the best cutoff points for the biomarkers based on sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,377 patients admitted to the intensive care unit, 458 were included in the analysis, 356 in the Successful Weaning Group and 102 in the Failure Group. The cutoff points found from the ROC curves were -62.4% for C-reactive protein, +45.7% for total lymphocytes, and -32.9% for neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. These points were significantly associated with greater extubation success. In the multivariate analysis, only C-reactive protein variation remained statistically significant (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.51 - 4.5; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, a decrease in C-reactive protein levels was associated with successful extubation in COVID-19 patients. Total lymphocytes and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio did not maintain the association after multivariate analysis. However, a decrease in C-reactive protein levels should not be used as a sole variable to identify COVID-19 patients suitable for weaning; as in our study, the area under the ROC curve demonstrated poor accuracy in discriminating extubation outcomes, with low sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240158en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240158-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association of biomarkers with successful ventilatory weaning in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: An observational, retrospective, and single-center study was conducted between March 2020 and April 2021. C-reactive protein, total lymphocytes, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were evaluated during attrition and extubation, and the variation in these biomarker values was measured. The primary outcome was successful extubation. ROC curves were drawn to find the best cutoff points for the biomarkers based on sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression.

Results: Of the 2,377 patients admitted to the intensive care unit, 458 were included in the analysis, 356 in the Successful Weaning Group and 102 in the Failure Group. The cutoff points found from the ROC curves were -62.4% for C-reactive protein, +45.7% for total lymphocytes, and -32.9% for neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. These points were significantly associated with greater extubation success. In the multivariate analysis, only C-reactive protein variation remained statistically significant (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.51 - 4.5; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this study, a decrease in C-reactive protein levels was associated with successful extubation in COVID-19 patients. Total lymphocytes and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio did not maintain the association after multivariate analysis. However, a decrease in C-reactive protein levels should not be used as a sole variable to identify COVID-19 patients suitable for weaning; as in our study, the area under the ROC curve demonstrated poor accuracy in discriminating extubation outcomes, with low sensitivity and specificity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物与 COVID-19 患者成功断气的关系:一项观察性研究。
目的:评估生物标志物与 COVID-19 患者成功断气的关系:评估生物标志物与 COVID-19 患者成功断气的相关性:2020年3月至2021年4月期间进行了一项观察性、回顾性和单中心研究。在自然减员和拔管期间评估了 C 反应蛋白、总淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值,并测量了这些生物标志物值的变化。主要结果是成功拔管。根据灵敏度和特异性绘制了 ROC 曲线,以找到生物标志物的最佳临界点。统计分析采用逻辑回归法:在重症监护室收治的 2377 名患者中,有 458 人被纳入分析,其中 356 人被纳入成功断奶组,102 人被纳入失败断奶组。根据 ROC 曲线得出的临界点分别为:C 反应蛋白 -62.4%、总淋巴细胞 +45.7% 和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 -32.9%。这些指标与更大的拔管成功率明显相关。在多变量分析中,只有 C 反应蛋白的变化仍具有统计学意义(OR 2.6;95%CI 1.51 - 4.5;P < 0.001):在这项研究中,C-反应蛋白水平的下降与 COVID-19 患者成功拔管有关。经多变量分析后,总淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与成功拔管无关。然而,C反应蛋白水平的降低不应作为识别适合断奶的 COVID-19 患者的唯一变量;与我们的研究一样,ROC 曲线下面积在判别拔管结果方面的准确性很差,敏感性和特异性都很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1