Formative Evaluation of CLABSI Adoption and Sustainment Interventions in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719
Lindsey J Patton, Angelica Morris, Amanda Nash, Kendel Richards, Leslie Huntington, Lori Batchelor, Jenna Harris, Virginia Young, Carol J Howe
{"title":"Formative Evaluation of CLABSI Adoption and Sustainment Interventions in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Lindsey J Patton, Angelica Morris, Amanda Nash, Kendel Richards, Leslie Huntington, Lori Batchelor, Jenna Harris, Virginia Young, Carol J Howe","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients require central venous catheters to maintain adequate hydration, nutritional status, and delivery of life-saving medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Although central venous catheters provide critical medical therapies, their use increases the risk of severe infection, morbidity, and mortality. Adopting an evidence-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) bundle to guide nursing practice can decrease and sustain low CLABSI rates, but reliable and consistent implementation is challenging. This study aimed to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation to explore CLABSI bundle implementation strategies in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The team used The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop the interview guide and data analysis plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators and barriers for the CLABSI bundle occurred in four domains: inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, and innovation characteristics in each cycle that led to recommended implementation strategy opportunities. The <i>champion</i> role was a major implementation strategy that facilitated the adoption and sustainment of the CLABSI bundle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation Science Frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), can be a beneficial framework to guide quality improvement efforts for evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle. Using a champion role in the critical care setting may be an important implementation strategy for CLABSI bundle adoption and sustainment efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric patients require central venous catheters to maintain adequate hydration, nutritional status, and delivery of life-saving medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Although central venous catheters provide critical medical therapies, their use increases the risk of severe infection, morbidity, and mortality. Adopting an evidence-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) bundle to guide nursing practice can decrease and sustain low CLABSI rates, but reliable and consistent implementation is challenging. This study aimed to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation to explore CLABSI bundle implementation strategies in a PICU.

Methods: The team used The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop the interview guide and data analysis plan.

Results: Facilitators and barriers for the CLABSI bundle occurred in four domains: inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, and innovation characteristics in each cycle that led to recommended implementation strategy opportunities. The champion role was a major implementation strategy that facilitated the adoption and sustainment of the CLABSI bundle.

Conclusions: Implementation Science Frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), can be a beneficial framework to guide quality improvement efforts for evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle. Using a champion role in the critical care setting may be an important implementation strategy for CLABSI bundle adoption and sustainment efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护病房采用和维持 CLABSI 干预措施的形成性评估。
背景:在儿科重症监护病房,儿科患者需要使用中心静脉导管来维持充足的水分、营养状况和救命药物的输送。虽然中心静脉导管可提供关键的医疗疗法,但其使用会增加严重感染、发病率和死亡率的风险。采用循证中心静脉相关性血流感染(CLABSI)捆绑包指导护理实践可以降低并维持较低的 CLABSI 感染率,但可靠、一致的实施却具有挑战性。本研究旨在采用混合方法进行形成性评估,以探讨在 PICU 中实施 CLABSI 套件的策略:研究小组使用实施研究综合框架制定了访谈指南和数据分析计划:结果:CLABSI感染捆绑治疗的促进因素和障碍出现在四个领域:内部环境、流程、个人特征和创新特征,在每个循环中都有建议实施策略的机会。倡导者的角色是一项主要的实施策略,它促进了 CLABSI 套件的采用和维持:结论:实施科学框架,如实施研究综合框架(CFIR),可以成为指导循证实践(如 CLABSI 套件)质量改进工作的有益框架。在重症监护环境中使用支持者角色可能是采用和维持 CLABSI 套件的重要实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use. How Super Is Supertrack? Expediting Care of Fast-track Patients through a Pediatric Emergency Department. Integrating Emotional Health Assessments into Pediatric Care: Initial Learnings from an MOC Part 4 Activity. Focused Team Engagements to Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration and Safety Behaviors among Novice Nurses and Medical Residents. Sustainability of a PICU Situation Awareness Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1