Neural correlations between cognitive deficits and emotion regulation strategies: understanding emotion dysregulation in depression from the perspective of cognitive control and cognitive biases.

Psychoradiology Pub Date : 2022-11-10 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1093/psyrad/kkac014
Wei Gao, XinYu Yan, JiaJin Yuan
{"title":"Neural correlations between cognitive deficits and emotion regulation strategies: understanding emotion dysregulation in depression from the perspective of cognitive control and cognitive biases.","authors":"Wei Gao, XinYu Yan, JiaJin Yuan","doi":"10.1093/psyrad/kkac014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The link between cognitive function and emotion regulation may be helpful in better understanding the onset, maintenance, and treatment for depression. However, it remains unclear whether there are neural correlates between emotion dysregulation and cognitive deficits in depression. To address this question, we first review the neural representations of emotion dysregulation and cognitive deficits in depression (including deficits in cognitive control and cognitive biases). Based on the comparisons of neural representations of emotion dysregulation versus cognitive deficits, we propose an accessible and reasonable link between emotion dysregulation, cognitive control, and cognitive biases in depression. Specifically, cognitive control serves the whole process of emotion regulation, whereas cognitive biases are engaged in emotion regulation processes at different stages. Moreover, the abnormal implementation of different emotion regulation strategies in depression is consistently affected by cognitive control, which is involved in the dorsolateral, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex. Besides, the relationship between different emotion regulation strategies and cognitive biases in depression may be distinct: the orbitofrontal cortex contributes to the association between ineffective reappraisal and negative interpretation bias, while the subgenual prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex underline the tendency of depressed individuals to ruminate and overly engage in self-referential bias. This review sheds light on the relationship between cognitive deficits and emotion dysregulation in depression and identifies directions in need of future attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":93496,"journal":{"name":"Psychoradiology","volume":"2 3","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkac014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The link between cognitive function and emotion regulation may be helpful in better understanding the onset, maintenance, and treatment for depression. However, it remains unclear whether there are neural correlates between emotion dysregulation and cognitive deficits in depression. To address this question, we first review the neural representations of emotion dysregulation and cognitive deficits in depression (including deficits in cognitive control and cognitive biases). Based on the comparisons of neural representations of emotion dysregulation versus cognitive deficits, we propose an accessible and reasonable link between emotion dysregulation, cognitive control, and cognitive biases in depression. Specifically, cognitive control serves the whole process of emotion regulation, whereas cognitive biases are engaged in emotion regulation processes at different stages. Moreover, the abnormal implementation of different emotion regulation strategies in depression is consistently affected by cognitive control, which is involved in the dorsolateral, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex. Besides, the relationship between different emotion regulation strategies and cognitive biases in depression may be distinct: the orbitofrontal cortex contributes to the association between ineffective reappraisal and negative interpretation bias, while the subgenual prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex underline the tendency of depressed individuals to ruminate and overly engage in self-referential bias. This review sheds light on the relationship between cognitive deficits and emotion dysregulation in depression and identifies directions in need of future attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知缺陷与情绪调节策略之间的神经相关性:从认知控制和认知偏差的角度理解抑郁症中的情绪失调。
认知功能与情绪调节之间的联系可能有助于更好地理解抑郁症的发病、维持和治疗。然而,抑郁症患者的情绪失调与认知缺陷之间是否存在神经相关性,目前仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们首先回顾了抑郁症中情绪失调和认知缺陷(包括认知控制和认知偏差的缺陷)的神经表征。基于情绪失调与认知缺陷的神经表征的比较,我们提出了抑郁症中情绪失调、认知控制和认知偏差之间的可及性和合理性联系。具体来说,认知控制服务于情绪调节的整个过程,而认知偏差则参与情绪调节过程的不同阶段。此外,抑郁症患者不同情绪调节策略的异常实施始终受到认知控制的影响,而认知控制涉及背外侧、背内侧前额叶皮层和前扣带回皮层。此外,抑郁症患者的不同情绪调节策略与认知偏差之间的关系可能是不同的:眶额叶皮层有助于无效再评价与消极解释偏差之间的关联,而亚源前额叶皮层和后扣带回皮层则强调抑郁症患者的反刍倾向和过度自我参照偏差。这篇综述揭示了抑郁症患者认知缺陷与情绪失调之间的关系,并指出了未来需要关注的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functional connectivity analyses of individual hippocampal subregions in major depressive disorder with electroconvulsive therapy. A decade of white matter connectivity studies in developmental dyslexia. Development of the brain network control theory and its implications. Exploring methodological frontiers in laminar fMRI. Identifying brain targets for real-time fMRI neurofeedback in chronic pain: insights from functional neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1