Prenatal Exposure to the 1944-45 Dutch Famine and Risk for Dementia up to Age 75: An Analysis of Primary Care Data.

Aline Marileen Wiegersma, Amber Boots, Emma F van Bussel, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Mark M J Nielen, Tessa J Roseboom, Susanne R de Rooij
{"title":"Prenatal Exposure to the 1944-45 Dutch Famine and Risk for Dementia up to Age 75: An Analysis of Primary Care Data.","authors":"Aline Marileen Wiegersma, Amber Boots, Emma F van Bussel, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Mark M J Nielen, Tessa J Roseboom, Susanne R de Rooij","doi":"10.2174/0115672050290699240422050036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A poor prenatal environment adversely affects brain development. Studies investigating long-term consequences of prenatal exposure to the 1944-45 Dutch famine have shown that those exposed to famine in early gestation had poorer selective attention, smaller brain volumes, poorer brain perfusion, older appearing brains, and increased reporting of cognitive problems, all indicative of increased dementia risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the current population-based study, we investigated whether dementia incidence up to age 75 was higher among individuals who had been prenatally exposed to famine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included men (n=6,714) and women (n=7,051) from the Nivel Primary Care Database who had been born in seven cities affected by the Dutch famine. We used Cox regression to compare dementia incidence among individuals exposed to famine during late (1,231), mid (1,083), or early gestation (601) with those unexposed (born before or conceived after the famine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe differences in dementia incidence for those exposed to famine in mid or early gestation compared to those unexposed. Men and women exposed to famine in late gestation had significantly lower dementia rates compared to unexposed individuals (HR 0.52 (95%CI 0.30-0.89)). Sex-specific analyses showed a lower dementia rate in women exposed to famine in late gestation (HR 0.39 (95%CI 0.17-0.86)) but not in men (HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.33-1.41)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine has previously been associated with measures of accelerated brain aging, the present population-based study did not show increased dementia incidence up to age 75 in those exposed to famine during gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":"101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050290699240422050036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A poor prenatal environment adversely affects brain development. Studies investigating long-term consequences of prenatal exposure to the 1944-45 Dutch famine have shown that those exposed to famine in early gestation had poorer selective attention, smaller brain volumes, poorer brain perfusion, older appearing brains, and increased reporting of cognitive problems, all indicative of increased dementia risk.

Objective: In the current population-based study, we investigated whether dementia incidence up to age 75 was higher among individuals who had been prenatally exposed to famine.

Methods: We included men (n=6,714) and women (n=7,051) from the Nivel Primary Care Database who had been born in seven cities affected by the Dutch famine. We used Cox regression to compare dementia incidence among individuals exposed to famine during late (1,231), mid (1,083), or early gestation (601) with those unexposed (born before or conceived after the famine).

Results: We did not observe differences in dementia incidence for those exposed to famine in mid or early gestation compared to those unexposed. Men and women exposed to famine in late gestation had significantly lower dementia rates compared to unexposed individuals (HR 0.52 (95%CI 0.30-0.89)). Sex-specific analyses showed a lower dementia rate in women exposed to famine in late gestation (HR 0.39 (95%CI 0.17-0.86)) but not in men (HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.33-1.41)).

Conclusion: Although prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine has previously been associated with measures of accelerated brain aging, the present population-based study did not show increased dementia incidence up to age 75 in those exposed to famine during gestation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前暴露于 1944-45 年荷兰大饥荒与 75 岁前痴呆症风险:初级保健数据分析。
背景:恶劣的产前环境会对大脑发育产生不利影响。对产前暴露于 1944-45 年荷兰饥荒的长期后果进行的调查研究表明,那些在妊娠早期暴露于饥荒的人选择性注意力较差、脑容量较小、脑灌注较差、大脑显现较老、报告认知问题的次数增多,所有这些都表明痴呆症风险增加:在目前这项基于人群的研究中,我们调查了产前遭受过饥荒的人在 75 岁之前的痴呆症发病率是否更高:我们从 Nivel 初级医疗数据库中纳入了出生在受荷兰饥荒影响的七个城市的男性(n=6714)和女性(n=7051)。我们使用 Cox 回归法比较了在妊娠晚期(1,231 人)、中期(1,083 人)或早期(601 人)遭受饥荒的人与未遭受饥荒的人(在饥荒前出生或在饥荒后受孕)的痴呆症发病率:我们没有观察到妊娠中期或早期遭受饥荒的人与未遭受饥荒的人在痴呆症发病率上存在差异。与未接触过饥荒的人相比,妊娠晚期接触过饥荒的男性和女性痴呆症发病率明显较低(HR 0.52 [95%CI 0.30-0.89])。性别特异性分析显示,妊娠晚期遭受饥荒的女性痴呆率较低(HR 0.39 [95%CI 0.17-0.86]),但男性痴呆率较低(HR 0.68 [95%CI 0.33-1.41]):尽管产前遭受荷兰饥荒与大脑加速衰老有关,但本人口研究并未显示妊娠期遭受饥荒的人群在75岁之前痴呆症发病率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Dementia and their Caregivers: A Multiphase Observational Study from India. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Association between Physical Activity and Cognitive Function Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Tianjin. Correlations between SHBG, Sex Hormones, Inflammation, and Neurocognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease:A Retrospective Study. Transforming Alzheimer's Digital Caregiving through Large Language Models. Age-Related Differences in the Association between Life's Essential 8 and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Adults: The CABLE Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1