Donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantation with a direct stool testing-based strategy: a prospective cohort study

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Microbes and Infection Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105341
Debora Rondinella , Gianluca Quaranta , Tommaso Rozera , Pasquale Dargenio , Giovanni Fancello , Irene Venturini , Alessandra Guarnaccia , Serena Porcari , Stefano Bibbò , Maurizio Sanguinetti , Antonio Gasbarrini , Luca Masucci , Giovanni Cammarota , Gianluca Ianiro
{"title":"Donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantation with a direct stool testing-based strategy: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Debora Rondinella ,&nbsp;Gianluca Quaranta ,&nbsp;Tommaso Rozera ,&nbsp;Pasquale Dargenio ,&nbsp;Giovanni Fancello ,&nbsp;Irene Venturini ,&nbsp;Alessandra Guarnaccia ,&nbsp;Serena Porcari ,&nbsp;Stefano Bibbò ,&nbsp;Maurizio Sanguinetti ,&nbsp;Antonio Gasbarrini ,&nbsp;Luca Masucci ,&nbsp;Giovanni Cammarota ,&nbsp;Gianluca Ianiro","doi":"10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective against recurrent <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (rCDI), but its safety is jeopardized by the potential transmission of pathogens, so international guidelines recommend either a quarantine or a direct stool testing. Whereas reports of the quarantine-based approach are emerging, data on the direct testing-based approach are not available. Our aim is to report outcomes of a donor screening framework for FMT including direct stool testing.</p><p>In this prospective cohort study, all donor candidates recruited at our FMT centre underwent a four-step screening process to be enrolled as actual donors. Each collected stool donation was then evaluated with a direct stool testing including a molecular assay for gut pathogens and a culture assay for multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO).</p><p>From January 2019 to June 2023, 72 of 227 candidates (32%) were considered eligible and provided 277 stool donations. Ninety-nine donations (36%) were discarded for positivity to intestinal pathogens, most commonly enteropathogenic <em>Escherichia coli</em> (n = 37) and <em>Blastocystis hominis</em> (n = 20). Overall, 337 stool aliquots were obtained from 165 approved donations. All suspensions were used for patients with rCDI, and no serious adverse events or clinically evident infections were observed at 12 weeks after procedures.</p><p>In our study, screening of donor faeces including direct stool testing led to the discard of a considerable rate of stool donations but was also extremely safe. This approach may represent a reliable strategy to guarantee the safety of FMT programs, especially in countries with high prevalence of MDRO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18497,"journal":{"name":"Microbes and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286457924000716/pdfft?md5=5c2186591be258d997c7c256ea148c99&pid=1-s2.0-S1286457924000716-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbes and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286457924000716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective against recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), but its safety is jeopardized by the potential transmission of pathogens, so international guidelines recommend either a quarantine or a direct stool testing. Whereas reports of the quarantine-based approach are emerging, data on the direct testing-based approach are not available. Our aim is to report outcomes of a donor screening framework for FMT including direct stool testing.

In this prospective cohort study, all donor candidates recruited at our FMT centre underwent a four-step screening process to be enrolled as actual donors. Each collected stool donation was then evaluated with a direct stool testing including a molecular assay for gut pathogens and a culture assay for multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO).

From January 2019 to June 2023, 72 of 227 candidates (32%) were considered eligible and provided 277 stool donations. Ninety-nine donations (36%) were discarded for positivity to intestinal pathogens, most commonly enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (n = 37) and Blastocystis hominis (n = 20). Overall, 337 stool aliquots were obtained from 165 approved donations. All suspensions were used for patients with rCDI, and no serious adverse events or clinically evident infections were observed at 12 weeks after procedures.

In our study, screening of donor faeces including direct stool testing led to the discard of a considerable rate of stool donations but was also extremely safe. This approach may represent a reliable strategy to guarantee the safety of FMT programs, especially in countries with high prevalence of MDRO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以粪便直接检测为基础的粪便微生物群移植捐献者筛选策略:一项前瞻性队列研究。
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)对复发性艰难梭菌感染(rCDI)有效,但其安全性因病原体的潜在传播而受到威胁,因此国际指南建议进行隔离或直接粪便检测。关于检疫方法的报告不断涌现,而关于直接检测方法的数据却尚未获得。我们的目的是报告包括粪便直接检测在内的 FMT 供体筛查框架的结果。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们的 FMT 中心招募的所有候选捐献者都经过了四步筛选流程,最终被登记为实际捐献者。然后,对收集到的每一份粪便捐献者进行粪便直接检测评估,包括肠道病原体分子检测和多重耐药菌(MDRO)培养检测。从 2019 年 1 月到 2023 年 6 月,227 名候选人中有 72 人(32%)被认为符合条件,并提供了 277 份粪便捐赠。99份捐赠(36%)因肠道病原体阳性而被放弃,其中最常见的是肠致病性大肠杆菌(37份)和高致病性布氏杆菌(20份)。总体而言,从 165 份经批准的捐赠中获得了 337 份粪便等分样品。所有悬浮液均用于 rCDI 患者,术后 12 周未发现严重不良事件或临床明显感染。在我们的研究中,对捐献者粪便的筛查(包括直接粪便检测)导致相当比例的粪便捐献被放弃,但也非常安全。这种方法可能是保证 FMT 项目安全的可靠策略,尤其是在 MDRO 感染率较高的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbes and Infection
Microbes and Infection 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
1.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Microbes and Infection publishes 10 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of infection and immunity, covering the different levels of host-microbe interactions, and in particular: the molecular biology and cell biology of the crosstalk between hosts (human and model organisms) and microbes (viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi), including molecular virulence and evasion mechanisms. the immune response to infection, including pathogenesis and host susceptibility. emerging human infectious diseases. systems immunology. molecular epidemiology/genetics of host pathogen interactions. microbiota and host "interactions". vaccine development, including novel strategies and adjuvants. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials and biomarker studies in infectious diseases are within the scope of the journal. Microbes and Infection publishes articles on human pathogens or pathogens of model systems. However, articles on other microbes can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of host-pathogen interactions. Purely descriptive and preliminary studies are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
Nano-Enhanced Benzylpenicillin: Bridging Antibacterial Action with Anti-Inflammatory Potential against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. TGEV nonstructural protein ORF3b upregulates the expression of SLA-DR at the transcriptional level in monocyte-derived porcine dendritic cells. Bad company? The pericardium microbiome in people investigated for tuberculous pericarditis in an HIV-prevalent setting. miRNAs Regulate the Metabolic Adaptation of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis during Copper Deprivation. Intranasal immunization with poly I:C and CpG ODN adjuvants enhances the protective efficacy against Helicobacter pylori infection in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1