"I Wonder if my Years of Training and Expertise Will be Devalued by Machines": Concerns About the Replacement of Medical Professionals by Artificial Intelligence.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241245220
Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Mst Rina Parvin, Md Wahiduzzaman, Mitun Debnath, Shuvashish Das Bala, Ibne Kayesh
{"title":"\"I Wonder if my Years of Training and Expertise Will be Devalued by Machines\": Concerns About the Replacement of Medical Professionals by Artificial Intelligence.","authors":"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Mst Rina Parvin, Md Wahiduzzaman, Mitun Debnath, Shuvashish Das Bala, Ibne Kayesh","doi":"10.1177/23779608241245220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has raised concerns among healthcare professionals about the potential displacement of human medical professionals by AI technologies. However, the apprehensions and perspectives of healthcare workers regarding the potential substitution of them with AI are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This qualitative research aimed to investigate healthcare workers' concerns about artificial intelligence replacing medical professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive and exploratory research design was employed, drawing upon the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Threat Avoidance Theory, and Sociotechnical Systems Theory as theoretical frameworks. Participants were purposively sampled from various healthcare settings, representing a diverse range of roles and backgrounds. Data were collected through individual interviews and focus group discussions, followed by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed seven key themes reflecting healthcare workers' concerns, including job security and economic concerns; trust and acceptance of AI; ethical and moral dilemmas; quality of patient care; workforce role redefinition and training; patient-provider relationships; healthcare policy and regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores the multifaceted concerns of healthcare workers regarding the increasing role of AI in healthcare. Addressing job security, fostering trust, addressing ethical dilemmas, and redefining workforce roles are crucial factors to consider in the successful integration of AI into healthcare. Healthcare policy and regulation must be developed to guide this transformation while maintaining the quality of patient care and preserving patient-provider relationships. The study findings offer insights for policymakers and healthcare institutions to navigate the evolving landscape of AI in healthcare while addressing the concerns of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241245220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has raised concerns among healthcare professionals about the potential displacement of human medical professionals by AI technologies. However, the apprehensions and perspectives of healthcare workers regarding the potential substitution of them with AI are unknown.

Objective: This qualitative research aimed to investigate healthcare workers' concerns about artificial intelligence replacing medical professionals.

Methods: A descriptive and exploratory research design was employed, drawing upon the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Threat Avoidance Theory, and Sociotechnical Systems Theory as theoretical frameworks. Participants were purposively sampled from various healthcare settings, representing a diverse range of roles and backgrounds. Data were collected through individual interviews and focus group discussions, followed by thematic analysis.

Results: The analysis revealed seven key themes reflecting healthcare workers' concerns, including job security and economic concerns; trust and acceptance of AI; ethical and moral dilemmas; quality of patient care; workforce role redefinition and training; patient-provider relationships; healthcare policy and regulation.

Conclusions: This research underscores the multifaceted concerns of healthcare workers regarding the increasing role of AI in healthcare. Addressing job security, fostering trust, addressing ethical dilemmas, and redefining workforce roles are crucial factors to consider in the successful integration of AI into healthcare. Healthcare policy and regulation must be developed to guide this transformation while maintaining the quality of patient care and preserving patient-provider relationships. The study findings offer insights for policymakers and healthcare institutions to navigate the evolving landscape of AI in healthcare while addressing the concerns of healthcare professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我不知道我多年的培训和专业知识是否会被机器贬值":对人工智能取代医疗专业人员的担忧。
背景:人工智能(AI)迅速融入医疗保健领域,引发了医疗保健专业人员对人工智能技术可能取代人类医疗专业人员的担忧。然而,医护人员对人工智能可能取代他们的担忧和看法却不得而知:本定性研究旨在调查医护人员对人工智能取代医疗专业人员的担忧:以技术接受模型(TAM)、技术威胁规避理论和社会技术系统理论为理论框架,采用描述性和探索性研究设计。研究人员有目的地从不同的医疗机构中抽取样本,代表了不同的角色和背景。通过个人访谈和焦点小组讨论收集数据,然后进行专题分析:分析揭示了七个关键主题,反映了医疗工作者的担忧,包括工作保障和经济担忧;对人工智能的信任和接受程度;伦理道德困境;患者护理质量;劳动力角色的重新定义和培训;患者与提供者的关系;医疗政策和法规:这项研究强调了医疗工作者对人工智能在医疗保健领域发挥越来越重要作用的多方面担忧。解决工作保障、促进信任、解决道德困境和重新定义员工角色是将人工智能成功融入医疗保健的关键因素。必须制定医疗保健政策和法规来引导这一转变,同时保持患者护理的质量并维护患者与医疗服务提供者之间的关系。研究结果为政策制定者和医疗保健机构提供了见解,以便在解决医疗保健专业人员所关心的问题的同时,引导人工智能在医疗保健领域的不断发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Clinical Performance Among Emergency Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurses' Self-Leadership in the Face of Challenging Situations, Such as Patient Deterioration. An Online Cross-Sectional Study of Nursing Students' Perceptions of Workplace Incivility in Nursing Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clinical Practice Competence and Its Associated Factors Among Generic Nursing Students Learning at Public Universities: A Cross-Sectional Study. Understanding the Relationship Between Critical Care Nurses' Perception of Patient Safety Culture and Adverse Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1