The Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment by Neurotrauma Specialists.

Q3 Medicine Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e12
Jung Hwan Park, In-Ho Jung, Jung-Ho Yun
{"title":"The Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment by Neurotrauma Specialists.","authors":"Jung Hwan Park, In-Ho Jung, Jung-Ho Yun","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the establishment of Regional Trauma Centers (RTCs) in Korea, significant efforts have been made to improve the quality of care for patients with trauma. Simultaneously, the Department of Neurosurgery assigned neurotrauma specialists to RTCs to provide specialized care to patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, we sought to determine whether neurotrauma specialists, compared to general neurosurgeons, could make a significant difference in treatment outcomes of patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 156 patients with acute TBI who required decompression were included. We reviewed their records and compared the characteristics, outcomes, and prognosis of those who received surgical treatment from either neurotrauma specialists or general neurosurgeons at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed between treatment by trauma neurosurgery specialists and general neurosurgeons in time to surgery, with trauma specialists experiencing shorter surgical delays. However, no significant differences existed in mortality rates or Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses revealed that lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, an abnormal pupil reflex, larger transfusion volume, and prolonged time from emergency room admission to surgery were associated with high mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurotrauma specialists can provide prompt surgical treatment to patients with TBI compared to general neurosurgeons. Our study did not reveal a significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. However, it is clear that rapid decompression is effective in patients with impending brain herniation. Therefore, the effectiveness of neurotrauma specialists needs to be confirmed through further systematic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"20 1","pages":"8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Since the establishment of Regional Trauma Centers (RTCs) in Korea, significant efforts have been made to improve the quality of care for patients with trauma. Simultaneously, the Department of Neurosurgery assigned neurotrauma specialists to RTCs to provide specialized care to patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study, we sought to determine whether neurotrauma specialists, compared to general neurosurgeons, could make a significant difference in treatment outcomes of patients with TBI.

Methods: In total, 156 patients with acute TBI who required decompression were included. We reviewed their records and compared the characteristics, outcomes, and prognosis of those who received surgical treatment from either neurotrauma specialists or general neurosurgeons at our institution.

Results: A significant difference was observed between treatment by trauma neurosurgery specialists and general neurosurgeons in time to surgery, with trauma specialists experiencing shorter surgical delays. However, no significant differences existed in mortality rates or Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses revealed that lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, an abnormal pupil reflex, larger transfusion volume, and prolonged time from emergency room admission to surgery were associated with high mortality rates.

Conclusion: Neurotrauma specialists can provide prompt surgical treatment to patients with TBI compared to general neurosurgeons. Our study did not reveal a significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. However, it is clear that rapid decompression is effective in patients with impending brain herniation. Therefore, the effectiveness of neurotrauma specialists needs to be confirmed through further systematic studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经创伤专科医生治疗脑外伤的疗效。
目的:自韩国建立区域创伤中心(RTC)以来,一直致力于提高创伤患者的护理质量。与此同时,神经外科也向区域创伤中心派驻了神经创伤专家,为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者提供专业护理。在这项研究中,我们试图确定与普通神经外科医生相比,神经创伤专家是否能显著改善创伤性脑损伤患者的治疗效果:共纳入 156 名需要减压的急性创伤性脑损伤患者。我们查阅了他们的病历,并比较了本院接受神经创伤专科医生或普通神经外科医生手术治疗的患者的特征、疗效和预后:创伤神经外科专家和普通神经外科医生在手术时间上存在明显差异,创伤专家的手术延迟时间更短。但是,死亡率或扩展格拉斯哥结果量表评分没有明显差异。单变量和多变量回归分析显示,较低的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、异常的瞳孔反射、较大的输血量以及从急诊室入院到手术的时间延长与高死亡率有关:与普通神经外科医生相比,神经创伤专科医生能为创伤性脑损伤患者提供及时的手术治疗。我们的研究并未发现两组患者的治疗效果有明显差异。不过,对于即将发生脑疝的患者来说,快速减压显然是有效的。因此,神经创伤专科医生的有效性需要通过进一步的系统研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Commentary on Acute Paraparesis Caused by Spinal Epidural Fluid After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Traumatic Avascular Necrosis: A Case Report (Korean J Neurotrauma 2023;19:398-402). Should Hypertonic Saline Be Considered for the Treatment of Intracranial Hypertension? A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practices. Pain Intervention for Osteoporotic Compression Fracture, From Physical Therapy to Surgery: A Literature Review. KJNT Symposium 2024: A Starting Point for a Leap Forward. Feasibility Study of Parkinson's Speech Disorder Evaluation With Pre-Trained Deep Learning Model for Speech-to-Text Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1