Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333928241249521
Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Gregory M Garrison, Brian A Crum
{"title":"Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types.","authors":"Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Gregory M Garrison, Brian A Crum","doi":"10.1177/23333928241249521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"11 ","pages":"23333928241249521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241249521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.

Methods: For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.

Results: There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.

Conclusion: Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型多专科多地点诊所的自我预约:对多种自主预约就诊类型的回顾性纵向研究。
背景介绍许多医疗机构都开始提供自主预约就诊服务。我们的目的是研究一个多专科诊所的自行安排就诊次数和自行安排就诊的增长率:从 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 24 日的 85 周内,我们对超过 1500 种自行安排就诊类型的自行安排就诊次数进行了检查。我们将已完成的自主预约就诊次数与相同就诊类型的所有已完成预约就诊次数进行了比较。我们收集了每周最常见的自行安排的访问类型的计数,并研究了其随时间的变化。我们还确定了每种访问类型中自行安排访问的比例:在研究过程中,共有 20,769,699 人完成了符合纳入标准的访问。自行安排的就诊占所有完成就诊的 4.0%(838 592/20769 699)。在 85 周的时间跨度内,自行安排的就诊次数占总就诊次数的比例从 3.0% 上升到 5.3%。与完成就诊相关的独特就诊类型有 1887 种。在总共 1887 种自行安排的就诊类型中,仅有 6 种预约就诊类型占到了总共 838 592 次自行安排就诊的 50.7%。这 6 种就诊类型分别是血液化验就诊类型(19.5%,163 K 人次)、两种家庭医学门诊就诊类型(13.0%,109 K 人次)、一种乳房 X 光筛查就诊类型(6.6%,55 K 人次)、一种预约快速护理就诊类型(6%,50 K 人次)和一种 COVID 免疫接种就诊类型(5.7%,48 K 人次)。自行安排的 21 种就诊类型占自行安排就诊总数的 75%。四种季节性就诊占自我安排就诊总数的 10.6%,几乎是自我安排就诊非线性变化的全部原因:结论:在一个多专科、多地点的诊所中,自行排班就诊占所有门诊排班就诊的比例很小,但却在不断增长。各种类型的门诊都可以成功地自行排期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Personality Traits, Coping Strategies, and 5-Year Change in Blood Pressure in Young Adults: The African-PREDICT Study. Developing a Physical Activity Program for Mothers and Their Children at Risk for Diabetes. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Utilization among Medically Underserved Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Need for an Artificial Intelligence-based Diabetes Care Management System in India and the United States. Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1