Implementation of a countywide adult suicide review commission: Development, lessons learned, and recommendations.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13089
Sara A Kohlbeck, Andrew T Schramm, Tricia Monroe, Jacey Kant, Emilie McLeod, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Stephen W Hargarten
{"title":"Implementation of a countywide adult suicide review commission: Development, lessons learned, and recommendations.","authors":"Sara A Kohlbeck, Andrew T Schramm, Tricia Monroe, Jacey Kant, Emilie McLeod, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Stephen W Hargarten","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fatality review is a public health approach designed to inform efforts to prevent fatalities of a certain kind (e.g., suicide, homicide) or in a specific setting or population (e.g., hospitals, youth). Despite extensive literature on fatality review generally, the literature on suicide review teams specifically is scant. The aim of this paper is to: describe the implementation of a local adult suicide review commission, detail examples of initial outcomes and recommendations developed by the commission, and provide recommendations and/or best practices for how to develop and implement an adult suicide review team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilize framing questions from the American Association of Suicidology's psychological autopsy framework. By using these guiding questions in the discussion, members are invited to explore not only the stressors that may have more immediately preceded the suicide event itself, but to situate those stressors in the context of the individual's life course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several recommendations proposed by our commission have resulted in tangible outcomes and are detailed using Haddon's Matrix as a guiding prevention planning tool.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>We have highlighted the need to move beyond looking at individual-level help-seeking to focus on structural/systemic issues that result in stress or create unsafe environments for at-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fatality review is a public health approach designed to inform efforts to prevent fatalities of a certain kind (e.g., suicide, homicide) or in a specific setting or population (e.g., hospitals, youth). Despite extensive literature on fatality review generally, the literature on suicide review teams specifically is scant. The aim of this paper is to: describe the implementation of a local adult suicide review commission, detail examples of initial outcomes and recommendations developed by the commission, and provide recommendations and/or best practices for how to develop and implement an adult suicide review team.

Methods: We utilize framing questions from the American Association of Suicidology's psychological autopsy framework. By using these guiding questions in the discussion, members are invited to explore not only the stressors that may have more immediately preceded the suicide event itself, but to situate those stressors in the context of the individual's life course.

Results: Several recommendations proposed by our commission have resulted in tangible outcomes and are detailed using Haddon's Matrix as a guiding prevention planning tool.

Implications: We have highlighted the need to move beyond looking at individual-level help-seeking to focus on structural/systemic issues that result in stress or create unsafe environments for at-risk individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全县成人自杀审查委员会的实施情况:发展、经验教训和建议。
导言:死亡事故审查是一种公共卫生方法,旨在为预防特定类型(如自杀、他杀)或特定环境或人群(如医院、青少年)的死亡事故提供信息。尽管关于一般死亡事故审查的文献很多,但具体到自杀审查小组的文献却很少。本文的目的是:描述当地成人自杀审查委员会的实施情况,详细介绍委员会取得的初步成果和提出的建议,并就如何发展和实施成人自杀审查小组提出建议和/或最佳实践:方法:我们采用了美国自杀学协会心理解剖框架中的框架问题。通过在讨论中使用这些指导性问题,成员们不仅可以探讨自杀事件发生前可能存在的压力因素,还可以将这些压力因素置于个体生命历程的背景下进行分析:结果:我们委员会提出的几项建议都取得了切实的成果,并将哈登矩阵作为指导预防规划的工具进行了详细说明:我们强调有必要超越个人层面的求助,转而关注导致压力或为高危人群创造不安全环境的结构性/系统性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Predictors and patterns of suicidal ideation disclosures among American adults. Suicide decision-making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide. Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress. Threat perceptions, defensive behaviors, and the perceived suicide prevention value of specific firearm storage practices. Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1