Unravelling Low-Value Care Decision-Making: Residents' Perspectives on the Influence of Contextual Factors.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7907
Lotte A Bock, Cindy Y G Noben, Roel H L Haeren, Florine A Hiemstra, Walther N K A van Mook, Brigitte A B Essers
{"title":"Unravelling Low-Value Care Decision-Making: Residents' Perspectives on the Influence of Contextual Factors.","authors":"Lotte A Bock, Cindy Y G Noben, Roel H L Haeren, Florine A Hiemstra, Walther N K A van Mook, Brigitte A B Essers","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several initiatives have been developed to target low-value care (i.e. waste) in decision-making with varying success. As such, decision-making is a complex process and context's influence on decisions concerning low-value care is limitedly explored. Hence, a more detailed understanding of residents' decision-making is needed to reduce future low-value care. This study explores which contextual factors residents experience to influence their decision-making concerning low-value care. Methods: We employed nominal group technique to select four low-value care vignettes. Prompted by these vignettes, we conducted individual interviews with residents. We analyzed the qualitative data thematically using an inductive-deductive approach, guided by Bronfenbrenner's social-ecological framework. This framework provided guidance to 'context' in terms of sociopolitical, environmental, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, we interviewed 19 residents from a Dutch university medical center. We identified 33 contextual factors influencing residents' decision-making, either encouraging or discouraging low-value care. The contextual factors resided in the following levels with corresponding categories: (1) environmental and sociopolitical: society, professional medical association, and governance; (2) organizational: facility characteristics, social infrastructure, and work infrastructure; (3) interpersonal: resident-patient, resident-supervising physician, and resident-others; and (4) individual: personal attributes and work structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper describes 33 contextual factors influencing residents' decision-making concerning low-value care. Residents are particularly influenced by factors related to interactions with patients and supervisors. Furthermore, organizational factors and the broader environment set margins within which residents make decisions. While acknowledging that a multi(faceted)-intervention approach targeting all contextual factors to discourage low-value care delivery may be warranted, improving communication skills in the resident-patient dynamics to recognize and explain low-value care seems a particular point of interest over which residents can exercise an influence themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several initiatives have been developed to target low-value care (i.e. waste) in decision-making with varying success. As such, decision-making is a complex process and context's influence on decisions concerning low-value care is limitedly explored. Hence, a more detailed understanding of residents' decision-making is needed to reduce future low-value care. This study explores which contextual factors residents experience to influence their decision-making concerning low-value care. Methods: We employed nominal group technique to select four low-value care vignettes. Prompted by these vignettes, we conducted individual interviews with residents. We analyzed the qualitative data thematically using an inductive-deductive approach, guided by Bronfenbrenner's social-ecological framework. This framework provided guidance to 'context' in terms of sociopolitical, environmental, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels.

Results: In 2022, we interviewed 19 residents from a Dutch university medical center. We identified 33 contextual factors influencing residents' decision-making, either encouraging or discouraging low-value care. The contextual factors resided in the following levels with corresponding categories: (1) environmental and sociopolitical: society, professional medical association, and governance; (2) organizational: facility characteristics, social infrastructure, and work infrastructure; (3) interpersonal: resident-patient, resident-supervising physician, and resident-others; and (4) individual: personal attributes and work structure.

Conclusion: This paper describes 33 contextual factors influencing residents' decision-making concerning low-value care. Residents are particularly influenced by factors related to interactions with patients and supervisors. Furthermore, organizational factors and the broader environment set margins within which residents make decisions. While acknowledging that a multi(faceted)-intervention approach targeting all contextual factors to discourage low-value care delivery may be warranted, improving communication skills in the resident-patient dynamics to recognize and explain low-value care seems a particular point of interest over which residents can exercise an influence themselves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读低价值护理决策:居民对环境因素影响的看法。
背景:针对决策中的低价值护理(即浪费),已经制定了多项措施,但取得的成效各不相同。因此,决策是一个复杂的过程,而背景对有关低价值护理决策的影响的探讨十分有限。因此,需要更详细地了解居民的决策,以减少未来的低价值护理。本研究探讨了居民在做出低价值护理决策时会受到哪些环境因素的影响。研究方法我们采用名义小组技术选取了四个低价值护理案例。在这些小故事的启发下,我们对居民进行了个别访谈。我们以布朗芬布伦纳的社会生态框架为指导,采用归纳-演绎法对定性数据进行了专题分析。该框架从社会政治、环境、组织、人际和个人层面为 "背景 "提供了指导:2022 年,我们对荷兰一所大学医疗中心的 19 名住院医师进行了访谈。结果:2022 年,我们对荷兰一所大学医疗中心的 19 名住院医师进行了访谈,确定了 33 个影响住院医师决策的背景因素,这些因素或鼓励或阻止低价值护理。这些背景因素分为以下几个层次,并有相应的类别:(1)环境和社会政治:社会、专业医疗协会和管理;(2)组织:设施特征、社会基础设施和工作基础设施;(3)人际:住院医师-患者、住院医师-指导医师和住院医师-其他人;以及(4)个人:个人属性和工作结构:本文描述了影响住院医师做出低价值护理决策的 33 个环境因素。住院医师尤其受到与患者和主管互动相关因素的影响。此外,组织因素和更广泛的环境也为住院医师做出决策设定了范围。虽然我们承认有必要针对所有环境因素采取多方面的干预措施来阻止低价值护理的提供,但提高住院医师与患者之间的沟通技巧以识别和解释低价值护理似乎是一个特别值得关注的问题,住院医师自身也可以对其施加影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Why Are African Researchers Left Behind in Global Scientific Publications? - A Viewpoint. Grappling With the Inclusion of Patients and the Public in Consensus Building: A Commentary on Inclusion, Safety, and Accessibility; Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study". Phase IV Drug Trials With a Canadian Site: A Comparison of Industry and Non-Industry-Funded Trials. The Rhetoric of Decolonizing Global Health Fails to Address the Reality of Settler Colonialism. Gaza as a Case in Point. Building a Systems Map: Applying Systems Thinking to Unhealthy Commodity Industry Influence on Public Health Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1