Comparing Telerehabilitation and In-Person Interventions in School-Based Occupational Therapy for Specific Learning Disorder A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v18i2.43985
Mahsa Kheirollahzadeh, Akram Azad, Seyed Hassan Saneii, Mehdi Alizadeh Zarei
{"title":"Comparing Telerehabilitation and In-Person Interventions in School-Based Occupational Therapy for Specific Learning Disorder A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mahsa Kheirollahzadeh, Akram Azad, Seyed Hassan Saneii, Mehdi Alizadeh Zarei","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v18i2.43985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the efficacy of telerehabilitation (TR) in school-based Occupational Therapy (OT) for children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD), focusing on occupational competence and parental satisfaction, aiming to contribute empirical insights to the discourse on the educational well-being of this population.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>The study adopted a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design involving 31 children diagnosed with SLD, implementing TR and in-person interventions alongside a control group. Outcome measures included the School Self-Concept Inventory, Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COMP), analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (ANOVA, post hoc tests).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both TR and in-person interventions exhibited significant enhancements in academic self-efficacy (F=23.96, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.461), occupational competence (F=70.59, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.716), and parent satisfaction (F=17.03, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.378) compared to the control group. Notably, no significant differences emerged between the TR and in-person groups, emphasizing their comparable effectiveness in improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the study demonstrated the efficacy of TR and in-person interventions in school-based OT for children with SLD. The cohesive outcomes in academic self-efficacy, occupational competence, and parental satisfaction highlight TR as a versatile modality. This research, grounded in robust methodology, encourages further exploration of TR's transformative role in enhancing the holistic well-being of children with SLDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"18 2","pages":"83-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11015722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v18i2.43985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the efficacy of telerehabilitation (TR) in school-based Occupational Therapy (OT) for children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD), focusing on occupational competence and parental satisfaction, aiming to contribute empirical insights to the discourse on the educational well-being of this population.

Materials & methods: The study adopted a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design involving 31 children diagnosed with SLD, implementing TR and in-person interventions alongside a control group. Outcome measures included the School Self-Concept Inventory, Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COMP), analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (ANOVA, post hoc tests).

Results: Both TR and in-person interventions exhibited significant enhancements in academic self-efficacy (F=23.96, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.461), occupational competence (F=70.59, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.716), and parent satisfaction (F=17.03, p<0.001, Partial ȵ²=0.378) compared to the control group. Notably, no significant differences emerged between the TR and in-person groups, emphasizing their comparable effectiveness in improving outcomes.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the study demonstrated the efficacy of TR and in-person interventions in school-based OT for children with SLD. The cohesive outcomes in academic self-efficacy, occupational competence, and parental satisfaction highlight TR as a versatile modality. This research, grounded in robust methodology, encourages further exploration of TR's transformative role in enhancing the holistic well-being of children with SLDs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在针对特殊学习障碍的校本职业疗法中,比较远程康复和面对面干预的随机对照试验。
研究目的本研究调查了远程康复(TR)在学校职业疗法(OT)中对特殊学习障碍(SLD)儿童的疗效,重点关注职业能力和家长满意度,旨在为有关该人群教育福祉的讨论提供经验见解:本研究采用随机对照试验(RCT)设计,涉及 31 名被诊断为 SLD 的儿童,在对照组的基础上实施 TR 和面对面干预。结果测量包括学校自我概念量表(School Self-Concept Inventory)、儿童职业自我评估(Child Occupational Self-Assessment,COSA)和加拿大职业表现测量(Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement,COMP):结果:TR 和面对面干预均显著提高了学业自我效能感(F=23.96,p):总之,本研究证明了在针对 SLD 儿童的校本 OT 中,TR 和面对面干预的有效性。在学业自我效能感、职业能力和家长满意度方面取得的共同成果突出表明,TR 是一种多用途模式。这项研究以可靠的方法为基础,鼓励进一步探索 TR 在提高 SLD 儿童整体福祉方面的变革作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
The Effects of 6-Month Exclusive Breastfeeding on Febrile Seizure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Electrodiagnostic Findings in a Case of Pyle's Disease: A Case-Report. Learning Outcomes of Virtual Journal Clubs in Comparison to Real Ones in Pediatric Neurology Fellows. Diversity in Clinical and Neurophysiological Manifestations of Epilepsy with Eyelid Myoclonia (Jeavons Syndrome) in Pediatric Population. Exploring the Role of MEFV Gene Mutations in Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1