Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-24 DOI:10.4047/jap.2024.16.2.126
Beatriz Sona Cardoso, Mariana Brito da Cruz, Joana Faria Marques, João Carlos Roque, João Paulo Martins, Rodrigo Cordeiro Malheiro, António Duarte da Mata
{"title":"Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer.","authors":"Beatriz Sona Cardoso, Mariana Brito da Cruz, Joana Faria Marques, João Carlos Roque, João Paulo Martins, Rodrigo Cordeiro Malheiro, António Duarte da Mata","doi":"10.4047/jap.2024.16.2.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an increase in cellular viability after 7 days in groups PC and PT, when compared to group PD. ND group resulted in higher concentration of IL-6 when compared to PT group. SEM and fluorescence micrographs showed less adhesion and thinner morphology of fibroblasts from group PD. No significant differences were found regarding surface roughness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of different printers or resins did not seem to influence surface roughness. NextDent 5100 and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K produced resins with similar cellular responses in human gingival fibroblasts. However, Denture 3D+ resin resulted in significantly lower biocompatibility, when compared to C&B MFH and Crowntec resins. Further testing is required to support its long-term use, required for complete dentures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.2.126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells.

Materials and methods: Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (P < .05).

Results: There was an increase in cellular viability after 7 days in groups PC and PT, when compared to group PD. ND group resulted in higher concentration of IL-6 when compared to PT group. SEM and fluorescence micrographs showed less adhesion and thinner morphology of fibroblasts from group PD. No significant differences were found regarding surface roughness.

Conclusion: The use of different printers or resins did not seem to influence surface roughness. NextDent 5100 and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K produced resins with similar cellular responses in human gingival fibroblasts. However, Denture 3D+ resin resulted in significantly lower biocompatibility, when compared to C&B MFH and Crowntec resins. Further testing is required to support its long-term use, required for complete dentures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用制造商推荐的打印机和第三方打印机生产的 3D 打印牙科树脂的细胞反应。
目的:本研究旨在通过使用制造商推荐的打印机和第三方打印机,评估不同 3D 牙科树脂对人牙龈细胞反应的影响:使用三种 NextDent 树脂(Denture 3D+、C&B MFH 和 Crowntec)在 NextDent 5100 打印机(分别为 ND、NC 和 NT 组)和 Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K 打印机(分别为 PD、PC 和 PT 组)上制作标本。培养人牙龈成纤维细胞,并在第 1、3 和 7 天评估其生物相容性。使用 ELISA 在 3 天时评估 IL-6 和 IL-8 的浓度。用接触式轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度。在第 1 天和第 7 天对扫描电镜和荧光显微照片进行分析。使用 SPSS 进行统计分析,使用方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验(P < .05)检验平均差异:结果:与 PD 组相比,PC 组和 PT 组细胞活力在 7 天后有所增加。与 PT 组相比,ND 组的 IL-6 浓度更高。扫描电镜和荧光显微照片显示,PD 组成纤维细胞的粘附力更弱,形态更薄。在表面粗糙度方面没有发现明显差异:结论:使用不同的打印机或树脂似乎不会影响表面粗糙度。NextDent 5100 和 Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K 所生产的树脂对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞反应相似。不过,与 C&B MFH 和 Crowntec 树脂相比,Denture 3D+ 树脂的生物相容性明显较低。还需要进一步的测试来支持其在全口义齿中的长期使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear. Clinical performance of implant-assisted removable partial dentures using implant surveyed crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis. Palatal vault configuration and its influence on intraoral scan time and accuracy in completely edentulous arches: a prospective clinical study. Recording maximal intercuspation and border positions of the mandible with intraoral scanner using the acquisition software's multi-occlusion function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1