Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.

Eartha Agatha Feller, Sofia Di Mario, Lucia Filomeno, Giuseppe La Torre
{"title":"Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.","authors":"Eartha Agatha Feller, Sofia Di Mario, Lucia Filomeno, Giuseppe La Torre","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to identify reported nursing-sensitive outcomes in the Emergency Department to date.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Umbrella review was conducted. Four databases, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022. MeSH terms were: \"nursing\", \"sensitivity and specificity\", \"emergency service, hospital\", \"nursing care\". Two reviewers independently screened studies against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality with the SIGN tool. Results of the included studies were summarized and described in themes for narrative analysis. The study was enrolled in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022376941) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 2289 records. After duplicate removal, title, abstract and full-text eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included in the review. A total of 35 nursing-sensitive outcomes were reported. The most described outcomes were waiting times, patient satisfaction and time to treatment. The less measured were mortality, left without being seen and physical function. Synthesizing nursing-sensitive outcomes in themes for reporting, the most measured outcomes were within the safety domain (n=20), followed by the clinical (n=9), perceptual (n=5) and the least explored functional domain (n=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing sensitive outcomes research in emergency nursing practice is a conceptual challenge still in its early stage. Several nursing-sensitive outcomes were identified in this review that can evaluate the contribution of emergency department nursing care to patient outcomes. Further research is required to explore patient outcomes sensitive to emergency nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review was to identify reported nursing-sensitive outcomes in the Emergency Department to date.

Methods: An Umbrella review was conducted. Four databases, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022. MeSH terms were: "nursing", "sensitivity and specificity", "emergency service, hospital", "nursing care". Two reviewers independently screened studies against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality with the SIGN tool. Results of the included studies were summarized and described in themes for narrative analysis. The study was enrolled in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022376941) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Results: The search strategy yielded 2289 records. After duplicate removal, title, abstract and full-text eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included in the review. A total of 35 nursing-sensitive outcomes were reported. The most described outcomes were waiting times, patient satisfaction and time to treatment. The less measured were mortality, left without being seen and physical function. Synthesizing nursing-sensitive outcomes in themes for reporting, the most measured outcomes were within the safety domain (n=20), followed by the clinical (n=9), perceptual (n=5) and the least explored functional domain (n=1).

Conclusion: Nursing sensitive outcomes research in emergency nursing practice is a conceptual challenge still in its early stage. Several nursing-sensitive outcomes were identified in this review that can evaluate the contribution of emergency department nursing care to patient outcomes. Further research is required to explore patient outcomes sensitive to emergency nursing care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科护理敏感结果评估:综述。
目的本综述旨在确定急诊科迄今为止所报告的护理敏感结果:方法:进行总括性综述。检索了从开始到 2022 年 10 月的四个数据库:CINAHL、Pubmed、Web of Science 和 Scopus。MeSH术语为"护理"、"敏感性和特异性"、"急诊服务、医院"、"护理"。两名审稿人根据纳入标准独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用 SIGN 工具评估研究质量。对纳入研究的结果进行总结,并按主题进行叙述性分析。该研究已被纳入 PROSPERO 注册中心(CRD42022376941),并遵循了 PRISMA 指南:结果:搜索策略产生了 2289 条记录。经过重复删除、标题、摘要和全文资格筛选,9 篇系统综述被纳入综述。共报告了 35 项护理敏感结果。描述最多的结果是等待时间、患者满意度和治疗时间。测量较少的是死亡率、未就诊时间和身体功能。根据报告主题对护理敏感结果进行综合,测量最多的结果是安全领域(20 个),其次是临床领域(9 个)、感知领域(5 个)和探索最少的功能领域(1 个):结论:急诊护理实践中的护理敏感结果研究是一项概念性挑战,目前仍处于早期阶段。本综述确定了几项护理敏感结果,可评估急诊科护理对患者预后的贡献。需要进一步开展研究,探索对急诊护理敏感的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
期刊最新文献
10.17533/udea.iee.v42n2e16. Advancement in knowledge and skills of nursing students in operation theatre procedures with mobile based learning. Analysis of the Formation of Scientific Communities in the Journal Research and Education in Nursing (2010 - 2020) and its Disciplinary Influence: an Approach from Bibliometric Analysis, Network Analysis, and Natural Language Processing. Development and Evaluation of a Software Designed by a Nursing and Technology Team to Assess the Health Status of Adults over 65 Years of Age. Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1