Post-marketing surveillance of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets in patients with bipolar depression.

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1002/npr2.12441
Taro Kishi, Nakao Iwata, Hiroyuki Irie, Masaru Aikawa
{"title":"Post-marketing surveillance of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets in patients with bipolar depression.","authors":"Taro Kishi, Nakao Iwata, Hiroyuki Irie, Masaru Aikawa","doi":"10.1002/npr2.12441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to verify the real-world efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets (Bipresso® 50 mg and 150 mg; marketing authorization holder is KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in patients with bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post-marketing surveillance with an observation period of 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the safety analysis group (n = 345), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 111 patients (32.17%). The most common ADRs (>1%) were somnolence in 55 patients (15.94%), akathisia in 11 (3.19%), dizziness in 10 (2.90%), weight increase in 6 (1.74%), thirst in 5 (1.45%), and hypersomnia, constipation, and nausea in 4 patients each (1.16%). The only severe ADR was one patient of suicidal ideation, and \"longer time since the onset of the first episode\" (p = 0.011) and \"presence of complications\" (p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs. In the efficacy analysis group (n = 265), the average changes from baseline in the total Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score were -7.3 ± 8.8, -12.2 ± 10.7, -16.8 ± 12.7, and -13.2 ± 12.7 points after 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at the last evaluation, respectively. The mean MADRS total score decrease had no significant association with maximum daily dose, diagnosis, and presence or absence of prior or concomitant treatment for bipolar disorder with mood stabilizers/antipsychotics/antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets was confirmed in clinical practice, and no new safety concerns or risks were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"424-436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to verify the real-world efficacy and safety of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets (Bipresso® 50 mg and 150 mg; marketing authorization holder is KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) in patients with bipolar depression.

Methods: We performed a post-marketing surveillance with an observation period of 12 weeks.

Results: In the safety analysis group (n = 345), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 111 patients (32.17%). The most common ADRs (>1%) were somnolence in 55 patients (15.94%), akathisia in 11 (3.19%), dizziness in 10 (2.90%), weight increase in 6 (1.74%), thirst in 5 (1.45%), and hypersomnia, constipation, and nausea in 4 patients each (1.16%). The only severe ADR was one patient of suicidal ideation, and "longer time since the onset of the first episode" (p = 0.011) and "presence of complications" (p < 0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs. In the efficacy analysis group (n = 265), the average changes from baseline in the total Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score were -7.3 ± 8.8, -12.2 ± 10.7, -16.8 ± 12.7, and -13.2 ± 12.7 points after 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at the last evaluation, respectively. The mean MADRS total score decrease had no significant association with maximum daily dose, diagnosis, and presence or absence of prior or concomitant treatment for bipolar disorder with mood stabilizers/antipsychotics/antidepressants.

Conclusion: The efficacy of quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets was confirmed in clinical practice, and no new safety concerns or risks were identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富马酸喹硫平缓释片在双相抑郁症患者中的上市后监测。
目的:本研究旨在验证富马酸喹硫平缓释片(Bipresso® 50 mg和150 mg;上市许可持有人为京和制药工业株式会社,日本大阪)在双相抑郁症患者中的实际疗效和安全性:我们对该药进行了上市后监测,观察期为12周:在安全性分析组(n = 345)中,111 例患者(32.17%)发生了药物不良反应(ADRs)。最常见的药物不良反应(>1%)为:55 名患者(15.94%)出现嗜睡,11 名患者(3.19%)出现运动障碍,10 名患者(2.90%)出现头晕,6 名患者(1.74%)体重增加,5 名患者(1.45%)出现口渴,4 名患者(1.16%)出现失眠、便秘和恶心。唯一严重的不良反应是一名有自杀倾向的患者,以及 "自首次发病以来的时间较长"(P = 0.011)和 "出现并发症"(P 结论:喹硫咪唑的疗效和并发症的发生率均低于其他药物:富马酸喹硫平缓释片的疗效在临床实践中得到了证实,没有发现新的安全问题或风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association Between Stress-Induced Weight Loss and Autophagy-Related Gene Expression in the Hippocampus and Midbrain of Depression Model Mice. Administration of a Selective Antagonist for Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide Receptor in the Hippocampus Causes Anxiolytic Effects in the Male Rat. Correction to "Qualitative Analysis of Blood From Patients Engaging in Deliberate Self-Harm: Differences Between Prescribed and Detected Drugs". Population Using Tobacco for Pain Relief: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study in Japan. Biotin Mitigates Alcohol Withdrawal-Induced Anxiety and Depression by Regulating Serotonin Metabolism, BDNF, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1