Prehistoric or current primitive cranial operations.

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.003
Jeremy C Ganz
{"title":"Prehistoric or current primitive cranial operations.","authors":"Jeremy C Ganz","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humankind demonstrates boundless curiosity, mostly expressed through the activities of a small number of individuals, whose achievements affect all members of society. The extent and distribution of pre-historic trepanation and trepanation in contemporary unsophisticated societies are reviewed. In the great majority of cases the intention of trepanation has been therapeutic, even if the understanding of underlying pathophysiology is not the same as that which scientific societies now accept. This review demonstrates variation in surgical technique. In the Atlas Mountains it was unacceptable to operate on the cranial sutures whereas in New Ireland it was not important. Pain relief was unnecessary in Melanesia because the patients were largely unconscious following injury. In South America, there was access to the coca leaf which could help with pain relief. In East Africa, one patient described the application of a powder to his wound which was thought to be for pain relief. The nature of the powder remains unknown. There were differences in the indications for trepanation. In New Britain, the operation was performed only for cases of fracture. In nearby New Ireland, epilepsy and certain forms of mental disturbance were also indications. In North and East Africa, the indication was most frequently headache following trauma. Most of these trepanations did not involve drilling, which is the main subject of this book.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"284 ","pages":"19-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.02.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humankind demonstrates boundless curiosity, mostly expressed through the activities of a small number of individuals, whose achievements affect all members of society. The extent and distribution of pre-historic trepanation and trepanation in contemporary unsophisticated societies are reviewed. In the great majority of cases the intention of trepanation has been therapeutic, even if the understanding of underlying pathophysiology is not the same as that which scientific societies now accept. This review demonstrates variation in surgical technique. In the Atlas Mountains it was unacceptable to operate on the cranial sutures whereas in New Ireland it was not important. Pain relief was unnecessary in Melanesia because the patients were largely unconscious following injury. In South America, there was access to the coca leaf which could help with pain relief. In East Africa, one patient described the application of a powder to his wound which was thought to be for pain relief. The nature of the powder remains unknown. There were differences in the indications for trepanation. In New Britain, the operation was performed only for cases of fracture. In nearby New Ireland, epilepsy and certain forms of mental disturbance were also indications. In North and East Africa, the indication was most frequently headache following trauma. Most of these trepanations did not involve drilling, which is the main subject of this book.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史前或现在的原始颅骨手术。
人类表现出无限的好奇心,这种好奇心主要通过少数人的活动表现出来,他们的成就影响着社会的所有成员。本文回顾了史前窒息术和当代不成熟社会中窒息术的程度和分布。在绝大多数情况下,尽管对潜在病理生理学的理解与现在科学界所接受的不尽相同,但穿孔手术的目的都是为了治疗。这篇综述展示了手术技巧的差异。在阿特拉斯山脉,在颅骨缝上动手术是不可接受的,而在新爱尔兰,这一点并不重要。在美拉尼西亚,由于病人在受伤后大多处于无意识状态,因此不需要止痛。在南美洲,人们可以吃到古柯叶,这有助于缓解疼痛。在东非,一名病人描述了在他的伤口上涂抹粉末的情况,据认为这是为了止痛。这种粉末的性质仍然不明。截肢手术的适应症存在差异。在新不列颠,只有骨折病例才会进行这种手术。在附近的新爱尔兰,癫痫和某些形式的精神障碍也是适应症。在北非和东非,最常见的适应症是外伤后的头痛。这些穿孔手术大多不涉及钻孔,这也是本书的主要内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
Effects of volume-matched acute exercise on metacognition in late middle-aged adults: The roles of exercise intensity and duration. Electrophysiological investigation of active-assisted vs recumbent cycling: A pilot study in healthy older adults. Examining the effects of exercise with different cognitive loads on executive function: A systematic review. Exploring the influence of a 4-week aerobic exercise intervention on cognitive control processes in young adults: An SFT and DDM study. Investigating mechanisms of sport-related cognitive improvement using measures of motor learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1