Optimization of the Diagnostic Capacity of Traditional Biomarkers in Muscle Damage and Its Use in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.

Q2 Medicine Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-11 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01
Sara Sanchez Asis, María Cristina Gómez Cobo, David Ramos Chavarino, Beatriz García García, Isabel Llompart Albern, José Antonio Delgado Rodríguez
{"title":"Optimization of the Diagnostic Capacity of Traditional Biomarkers in Muscle Damage and Its Use in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.","authors":"Sara Sanchez Asis, María Cristina Gómez Cobo, David Ramos Chavarino, Beatriz García García, Isabel Llompart Albern, José Antonio Delgado Rodríguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background-aim: </strong>Creatine kinase (CK) and aldolase are markers traditionally used in the study of muscle damage (MD). As CK determination is more specific to muscle damage, the demand for both determinations in routine laboratory tests would entail an extra cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study conducted between 2019-2020. CK and aldolase concentrations from 218 patients were studied.ROC curves were analyzed for CK and aldolase for muscle damage detection. Cut-off values were selected for both strategies. Specifity of CK and aldolase for dermatomyositis or polymyositis diagnosis in our population was studied using the McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for total CK was 0.716 (95%CI: 0.651-0.775), for CK in males it was 0.703 (95%CI: 0.592-0.799), and for CK in females was 0.719 (95%CI: 0.636-0.793). For aldolase, AUC was 0.505 (95%CI: 0.437-0.573). Optimized cut-off points for each determination were: 112 U/L for CK in men, with a sensitivity of 73.9% (95%CI: 51.6-89.8) and a specificity of 49.2% (95%CI: 35.9-62.5); 88 U/L for CK in women, with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI: 57.8-87.9) and specificity of 50.5% (95%CI: 40.4-60.6); and 5.6 U/L for aldolase, with a sensitivity of 61.0% (95%CI: 53.2-68.8) and a specificity of 38.8% (95%CI: 26.5-52.6).Regarding the individuals diagnosed with dermatomyositis or polymyositis, 66.7% and 44.4% of them were correctly classified as pathological by CK and aldolase results, respectively. McNemar's test did not reveal significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The determination of CK offers a better diagnostic performance of MD and, in addition, does not present significant differences regarding the determination of aldolase in cases of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Therefore, the single determination of CK would be sufficient for MD screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11063786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background-aim: Creatine kinase (CK) and aldolase are markers traditionally used in the study of muscle damage (MD). As CK determination is more specific to muscle damage, the demand for both determinations in routine laboratory tests would entail an extra cost.

Methods: Retrospective observational study conducted between 2019-2020. CK and aldolase concentrations from 218 patients were studied.ROC curves were analyzed for CK and aldolase for muscle damage detection. Cut-off values were selected for both strategies. Specifity of CK and aldolase for dermatomyositis or polymyositis diagnosis in our population was studied using the McNemar's test.

Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for total CK was 0.716 (95%CI: 0.651-0.775), for CK in males it was 0.703 (95%CI: 0.592-0.799), and for CK in females was 0.719 (95%CI: 0.636-0.793). For aldolase, AUC was 0.505 (95%CI: 0.437-0.573). Optimized cut-off points for each determination were: 112 U/L for CK in men, with a sensitivity of 73.9% (95%CI: 51.6-89.8) and a specificity of 49.2% (95%CI: 35.9-62.5); 88 U/L for CK in women, with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI: 57.8-87.9) and specificity of 50.5% (95%CI: 40.4-60.6); and 5.6 U/L for aldolase, with a sensitivity of 61.0% (95%CI: 53.2-68.8) and a specificity of 38.8% (95%CI: 26.5-52.6).Regarding the individuals diagnosed with dermatomyositis or polymyositis, 66.7% and 44.4% of them were correctly classified as pathological by CK and aldolase results, respectively. McNemar's test did not reveal significant differences.

Conclusion: The determination of CK offers a better diagnostic performance of MD and, in addition, does not present significant differences regarding the determination of aldolase in cases of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Therefore, the single determination of CK would be sufficient for MD screening.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化肌肉损伤传统生物标记物的诊断能力及其在皮肌炎和多发性肌炎诊断中的应用
背景-目的:肌酸激酶(CK)和醛缩酶是研究肌肉损伤(MD)的传统标记物。由于肌酸激酶的测定对肌肉损伤更具特异性,因此在常规实验室检测中同时测定这两种指标将产生额外费用:2019-2020年间进行的回顾性观察研究。研究了 218 名患者的肌酸激酶和醛缩酶浓度,分析了肌酸激酶和醛缩酶检测肌肉损伤的 ROC 曲线。为这两种策略选择了临界值。使用 McNemar 检验研究了皮肌炎或多发性肌炎诊断中 CK 和醛缩酶的特异性:总 CK 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.716(95%CI:0.651-0.775),男性 CK 为 0.703(95%CI:0.592-0.799),女性 CK 为 0.719(95%CI:0.636-0.793)。醛缩酶的 AUC 为 0.505(95%CI:0.437-0.573)。每次测定的最佳临界点为男性 CK 为 112 U/L,灵敏度为 73.9%(95%CI:51.6-89.8),特异性为 49.2%(95%CI:35.9-62.5);女性 CK 为 88 U/L,灵敏度为 75.0%(95%CI:57.8-87.9),特异性为 50.5%(95%CI:40.4-60.6);醛缩酶为 5.6 U/L,灵敏度为 61.对于确诊为皮肌炎或多发性肌炎的患者,CK和醛固酮酶结果分别有66.7%和44.4%的患者被正确归类为病理性患者。McNemar检验未发现显著差异:结论:在多发性肌炎和皮肌炎病例中,肌酸激酶的测定能更好地诊断多发性肌炎,而且与醛缩酶的测定相比也没有明显差异。因此,仅测定肌酸激酶就足以筛查多发性肌炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Survey on Quality Control and Method Evaluation Practices in Clinical Laboratories in Nepal. An Approach to Include the Cost of Consumables in Biochemistry Analyzer Procurement on the Reagent Rental Model Alleviates Hidden Expenses. Cancer Biomarker Concentration Changes During Tumor Progression. Characterizing Monoclonal Gammopathies in an East Moroccan Population: University Hospital Findings. Comparative Analysis of HbA1c Estimation Using Immunoturbidimetry and High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Methods in Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1