Novel emerging therapy for erectile dysfunction: efficacy and safety of flat magnetic stimulation.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.12506
Daniel Galimberti, Agustina Vila Echague, Ery A Ko, Laura Pieri, Alessandra Comito, Irene Fusco, Tiziano Zingoni
{"title":"Novel emerging therapy for erectile dysfunction: efficacy and safety of flat magnetic stimulation.","authors":"Daniel Galimberti, Agustina Vila Echague, Ery A Ko, Laura Pieri, Alessandra Comito, Irene Fusco, Tiziano Zingoni","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The erectile dysfunction (ED), which is the inability to achieve and/or sustain a penile erection sufficient to result in a satisfying sexual performance, represents a very common complaint. for men over forty years old. The aim of the study was to evaluate if Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) technology could help individuals with symptomatic erectile dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with erectile dysfunction, underwent eight sessions of about 30 minutes each in a twice a week frequency with the study device. During treatments, every potential side effect was assessed. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was compiled by all patients at the beginning, after the eighth treatment and at 1 month from the end of the last treatment. The questionnaire scores were presented as median values along with the interquartile range (IQR) and we set the significance threshold at 0.01.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, the increase in questionnaire scores was statistically significant compared to the baseline, thus supporting the clinical usefulness of this treatment. In particular, the result of the study indicates a statistically significant difference between IIEF score before treatment (Median = 34) and IIEF score after the end of treatment (Median = 45) and between IIEF score before treatment and IIEF score at 1-month follow-up (Median = 54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings showed that FMS represents a promising treatment option to individuals affected by symptomatic erectile dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The erectile dysfunction (ED), which is the inability to achieve and/or sustain a penile erection sufficient to result in a satisfying sexual performance, represents a very common complaint. for men over forty years old. The aim of the study was to evaluate if Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) technology could help individuals with symptomatic erectile dysfunction.

Methods: Twenty patients with erectile dysfunction, underwent eight sessions of about 30 minutes each in a twice a week frequency with the study device. During treatments, every potential side effect was assessed. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was compiled by all patients at the beginning, after the eighth treatment and at 1 month from the end of the last treatment. The questionnaire scores were presented as median values along with the interquartile range (IQR) and we set the significance threshold at 0.01.

Results: After the treatment and at 1-month follow-up, the increase in questionnaire scores was statistically significant compared to the baseline, thus supporting the clinical usefulness of this treatment. In particular, the result of the study indicates a statistically significant difference between IIEF score before treatment (Median = 34) and IIEF score after the end of treatment (Median = 45) and between IIEF score before treatment and IIEF score at 1-month follow-up (Median = 54).

Conclusions: The study findings showed that FMS represents a promising treatment option to individuals affected by symptomatic erectile dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗勃起功能障碍的新兴疗法:平面磁刺激的有效性和安全性。
背景:勃起功能障碍(ED)是指阴茎无法勃起和/或持续勃起以获得满意的性生活,是四十岁以上男性的常见病。这项研究的目的是评估平板磁刺激(FMS)技术能否帮助有症状的勃起功能障碍患者:二十名勃起功能障碍患者接受了八次治疗,每次约 30 分钟,每周两次使用研究设备。在治疗过程中,对所有可能出现的副作用进行了评估。所有患者在治疗开始时、第八次治疗后以及最后一次治疗结束后的一个月内都进行了国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)的问卷调查。问卷得分以中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)表示,我们将显著性阈值设定为 0.01:结果:在治疗后和 1 个月的随访中,与基线相比,问卷得分的增加具有统计学意义,从而证明了这种治疗方法的临床实用性。特别是,研究结果表明,治疗前的 IIEF 分数(中位数 = 34)与治疗结束后的 IIEF 分数(中位数 = 45)之间以及治疗前的 IIEF 分数与随访 1 个月时的 IIEF 分数(中位数 = 54)之间的差异具有统计学意义:研究结果表明,对于有症状的勃起功能障碍患者来说,FMS 是一种很有前景的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Bottoms-up" minimally-invasive approach to inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer management. A single-center comparative study versus open approach and review. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term complications of early versus delayed penile prosthesis implantation in patients with ischemic priapism. Adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines during ureteroscopy and stone lithotripsy: Insights from an updated 10-year analysis of the US MAUDE database. Can serum 17-hydroxy progesterone predict an improvement in semen parameters following micro-varicocelectomy? A prospective study. CFTR Exon 10 deleterious mutations in patients with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens in a cohort of Pakistani patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1