Worry as Important “Feelers” in Clinical Anesthesia Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.01.004
Noa Robben CRNA , Angelique T.M. Dierick-van Daele PhD , Arthur R.A. Bouwman PhD, MD , Fredericus H.J. van Loon PhD, CRNA
{"title":"Worry as Important “Feelers” in Clinical Anesthesia Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Noa Robben CRNA ,&nbsp;Angelique T.M. Dierick-van Daele PhD ,&nbsp;Arthur R.A. Bouwman PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Fredericus H.J. van Loon PhD, CRNA","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Worry is an intuitive sense that goes beyond logical reasoning and is valuable in situations where patients’ conditions are rapidly changing or when objective data may not fully capture the complexity of a patient’s situation. Nurse anesthetists’ subjective reasons for worry are quite vague as they are valued inconsistently and not accurately expressed. This study aimed to identify factors playing a role in the emergence of worry during anesthesia practice to clarify its concept.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed-methods design consisting of quantitative online surveys followed by qualitative focus group interviews including Dutch nurse anesthetists.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Both quantitative and qualitative thematic analyses were performed, followed by data and methodological triangulation to enhance the validity and credibility of findings and mitigate the presence of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Surveys (N = 102) were analyzed, and 14 nurse anesthetists participated in the focus group interviews. A total of 89% of the survey respondents reported that at least once have had the feeling of worry, of which 92% use worry during clinical anesthesia practice. Worry was mentioned to be a vital element during anesthesia practice that makes it possible to take precautionary actions to change the anesthetic care plan in a changing situation or patient deterioration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While a clear definition of worry could not be given, it is a valuable element of anesthesia practice as it serves as a catalyst for critical thinking, problem-solving, clinical reasoning, and decision-making. Use of the feeling of worry alongside technological systems to make an informed decision is crucial. Technology has significantly improved the ability of health care providers to detect and respond to patient deterioration promptly, but it is crucial for nurse anesthetists to use their feeling of worry or intuition alongside technological systems and evidence-based practice to ensure quick assessments or judgments based on experience, knowledge, and observations in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":"39 6","pages":"Pages 964-970"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108994722400011X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Worry is an intuitive sense that goes beyond logical reasoning and is valuable in situations where patients’ conditions are rapidly changing or when objective data may not fully capture the complexity of a patient’s situation. Nurse anesthetists’ subjective reasons for worry are quite vague as they are valued inconsistently and not accurately expressed. This study aimed to identify factors playing a role in the emergence of worry during anesthesia practice to clarify its concept.

Design

Mixed-methods design consisting of quantitative online surveys followed by qualitative focus group interviews including Dutch nurse anesthetists.

Methods

Both quantitative and qualitative thematic analyses were performed, followed by data and methodological triangulation to enhance the validity and credibility of findings and mitigate the presence of bias.

Findings

Surveys (N = 102) were analyzed, and 14 nurse anesthetists participated in the focus group interviews. A total of 89% of the survey respondents reported that at least once have had the feeling of worry, of which 92% use worry during clinical anesthesia practice. Worry was mentioned to be a vital element during anesthesia practice that makes it possible to take precautionary actions to change the anesthetic care plan in a changing situation or patient deterioration.

Conclusions

While a clear definition of worry could not be given, it is a valuable element of anesthesia practice as it serves as a catalyst for critical thinking, problem-solving, clinical reasoning, and decision-making. Use of the feeling of worry alongside technological systems to make an informed decision is crucial. Technology has significantly improved the ability of health care providers to detect and respond to patient deterioration promptly, but it is crucial for nurse anesthetists to use their feeling of worry or intuition alongside technological systems and evidence-based practice to ensure quick assessments or judgments based on experience, knowledge, and observations in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
担忧是临床麻醉实践中的重要 "感受器":混合方法研究。
目的:担心是一种超越逻辑推理的直觉,在患者病情瞬息万变或客观数据可能无法完全反映患者情况复杂性的情况下非常有价值。由于麻醉师对担心的主观原因重视程度不一且表达不准确,因此担心的主观原因相当模糊。本研究旨在确定麻醉实践中出现担忧的因素,以澄清其概念:混合方法设计,包括定量在线调查和定性焦点小组访谈,访谈对象包括荷兰麻醉护士:方法:进行定量和定性专题分析,然后进行数据和方法三角测量,以提高调查结果的有效性和可信度,并减少偏见的存在:对调查问卷(N = 102)进行了分析,14 名麻醉护士参加了焦点小组访谈。共有 89% 的调查对象表示至少有过一次忧虑感,其中 92% 的人在临床麻醉实践中使用忧虑感。担忧被认为是麻醉实践中的一个重要因素,可以在情况发生变化或患者病情恶化时采取预防措施,改变麻醉护理计划:虽然无法对忧虑给出明确的定义,但它是麻醉实践中的一个重要因素,因为它是批判性思维、解决问题、临床推理和决策的催化剂。利用忧虑感和技术系统做出明智决策至关重要。技术大大提高了医疗服务提供者及时发现和应对患者病情恶化的能力,但麻醉护士必须将忧虑感或直觉与技术系统和循证实践相结合,以确保在临床实践中根据经验、知识和观察做出快速评估或判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Cover 1 Editorial Board Table of Contents Children and the Opioid Crisis: We Can Make a Difference Worry as Important “Feelers” in Clinical Anesthesia Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1