Comparison and Agreement between Cardiovascular Computed Tomography-Derived Mid-Diastolic and End-Diastolic Ventricular Volume in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1007/s00246-024-03504-x
Daniel Cheong, Qais Alloah, Joanna S Fishbein, Hari G Rajagopal
{"title":"Comparison and Agreement between Cardiovascular Computed Tomography-Derived Mid-Diastolic and End-Diastolic Ventricular Volume in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.","authors":"Daniel Cheong, Qais Alloah, Joanna S Fishbein, Hari G Rajagopal","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03504-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) is primarily utilized for anatomical information in congenital heart disease (CHD) and has not been utilized for calculation of the end-diastolic volume (EDV); however, the mid-diastolic volume (MDV) may be measured. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and agreement between ventricular EDV and MDV. 31 retrospectively ECG-gated CCT were analyzed for the study of the 450 consecutive CCT. CCT images were processed using syngo.via with automatic contouring followed by manual adjustment of the endocardial borders of the left ventricles (LV) and right ventricles (RV) at end-diastolic and mid-diastolic phase (measured at 70% of cardiac cycle). The correlation and agreements between EDV and MDV were demonstrated using Spearman rank coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Mean age ± SD was 28.8 ± 12.5 years, 19 were male (61.3%) and tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) was the most common diagnosis (58.1%), 35% (11/31) patients with a pacemaker, ICD or other such contraindication for a CMRI, 23% (7/31) with claustrophobia, and 6.5% (2/31) with developmental delay with refusal for sedation did not have a previous CMRI. The mean ± SD indexed LV EDV and LV MDV were 91.1 ± 24.5 and 84.8 ± 22.3 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The mean ± SD indexed RV EDV and RV MDV were 136.8 ± 41 and 130.2 ± 41.5 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. EDV and MDV had a strong positive correlation and good agreement (ICC 0.92 for LV and 0.95 for RV). This agreement was preserved in a subset of patients (21) with dilated RV (indexed RV EDV z-score > 2). Intra-observer reliability (0.97 and 0.98 for LV and RV MDV, respectively) and inter-observer reliability (0.96 and 0.90 for LV and RV MDV, respectively) were excellent. In a select group of patients with CHD, measuring MDV by CCT is feasible and these values have good agreements with EDV. This may be used to derive functional data from prospectively ECG-triggered CCT studies. Further large-scale analysis is needed to determine accuracy and clinical correlation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"844-852"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03504-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) is primarily utilized for anatomical information in congenital heart disease (CHD) and has not been utilized for calculation of the end-diastolic volume (EDV); however, the mid-diastolic volume (MDV) may be measured. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and agreement between ventricular EDV and MDV. 31 retrospectively ECG-gated CCT were analyzed for the study of the 450 consecutive CCT. CCT images were processed using syngo.via with automatic contouring followed by manual adjustment of the endocardial borders of the left ventricles (LV) and right ventricles (RV) at end-diastolic and mid-diastolic phase (measured at 70% of cardiac cycle). The correlation and agreements between EDV and MDV were demonstrated using Spearman rank coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Mean age ± SD was 28.8 ± 12.5 years, 19 were male (61.3%) and tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) was the most common diagnosis (58.1%), 35% (11/31) patients with a pacemaker, ICD or other such contraindication for a CMRI, 23% (7/31) with claustrophobia, and 6.5% (2/31) with developmental delay with refusal for sedation did not have a previous CMRI. The mean ± SD indexed LV EDV and LV MDV were 91.1 ± 24.5 and 84.8 ± 22.3 ml/m2, respectively. The mean ± SD indexed RV EDV and RV MDV were 136.8 ± 41 and 130.2 ± 41.5 ml/m2, respectively. EDV and MDV had a strong positive correlation and good agreement (ICC 0.92 for LV and 0.95 for RV). This agreement was preserved in a subset of patients (21) with dilated RV (indexed RV EDV z-score > 2). Intra-observer reliability (0.97 and 0.98 for LV and RV MDV, respectively) and inter-observer reliability (0.96 and 0.90 for LV and RV MDV, respectively) were excellent. In a select group of patients with CHD, measuring MDV by CCT is feasible and these values have good agreements with EDV. This may be used to derive functional data from prospectively ECG-triggered CCT studies. Further large-scale analysis is needed to determine accuracy and clinical correlation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性心脏病患者心血管计算机断层扫描得出的舒张中期和舒张末期心室容积的比较和一致性。
前瞻性心电图(ECG)触发的心血管计算机断层扫描(CCT)主要用于获取先天性心脏病(CHD)的解剖信息,尚未用于计算舒张末期容积(EDV);但可以测量舒张中期容积(MDV)。本研究的目的是评估心室 EDV 和 MDV 的可行性和一致性。该研究分析了 31 个回顾性心电图门控 CCT,共 450 个连续 CCT。使用 syngo.via 对 CCT 图像进行了处理,在舒张末期和舒张中期(在心动周期的 70% 处测量)对左心室和右心室的心内膜边界进行了手动调整,然后自动绘制轮廓。EDV和MDV之间的相关性和一致性分别用Spearman秩系数和类内相关系数(ICC)来证明。平均年龄(±SD)为 28.8 ± 12.5 岁,19 名男性(61.3%),法洛氏四联症(TOF)是最常见的诊断(58.1%),35%(11/31)的患者有心脏起搏器、ICD 或其他此类 CMRI 禁忌症,23%(7/31)的患者有幽闭恐惧症,6.5%(2/31)的患者因发育迟缓拒绝镇静而未进行过 CMRI。平均值(± SD)的左心室 EDV 和左心室 MDV 分别为 91.1 ± 24.5 毫升/平方米和 84.8 ± 22.3 毫升/平方米。RV EDV 和 RV MDV 的平均值(± SD)分别为(136.8 ± 41)和(130.2 ± 41.5)毫升/平方米。EDV 和 MDV 具有很强的正相关性和良好的一致性(左心室和右心室的 ICC 分别为 0.92 和 0.95)。这种一致性在心室扩张(心室 EDV z 值指数大于 2)的患者子集(21 例)中得以保留。观察者内部的可靠性(左心室和右心室 MDV 分别为 0.97 和 0.98)和观察者之间的可靠性(左心室和右心室 MDV 分别为 0.96 和 0.90)都非常好。在特定的一组冠心病患者中,通过 CCT 测量 MDV 是可行的,而且这些值与 EDV 有很好的一致性。这可用于从前瞻性心电图触发的 CCT 研究中获取功能数据。需要进一步进行大规模分析,以确定准确性和临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
A Pediatric Interprofessional Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Intervention: CICU Teams and Loved Ones Communicating (CICU TALC) is Feasible, Acceptable, and Improves Clinician Communication Behaviors in Family Meetings. Comparison and Agreement between Cardiovascular Computed Tomography-Derived Mid-Diastolic and End-Diastolic Ventricular Volume in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Workload Based on the Stroke Work Index in Patients after Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction. Transcatheter Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect Using KONAR-MF™: A Multicenter Experience. Genetic Testing Resources and Practice Patterns Among Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1