Experiences of Allied Health Clinicians Accessing a Pilot Project ECHO® Program to Support Learning in Pediatric Feeding.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000557
Jeanne Marshall, Perrin Moss, Madeline Raatz, Elizabeth C Ward, Nadine Frederiksen, Claire Reilly, Corrine Dickinson, Sally Clarke, Kelly Beak
{"title":"Experiences of Allied Health Clinicians Accessing a Pilot Project ECHO® Program to Support Learning in Pediatric Feeding.","authors":"Jeanne Marshall, Perrin Moss, Madeline Raatz, Elizabeth C Ward, Nadine Frederiksen, Claire Reilly, Corrine Dickinson, Sally Clarke, Kelly Beak","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric feeding disorder is increasing in prevalence, yet low clinician confidence regarding its management is a barrier to care. Targeted clinician training is needed as traditional didactic training programs are limited in both their accessibility and capacity to provide opportunities for the application of theory-based learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the experiences of a group of clinicians involved in a multidisciplinary PedFeed ECHO® network, a virtual community of practice established to support speech pathologists, occupational therapists, dieticians, and psychologists in Queensland, Australia, working with children with pediatric feeding disorder. Sixteen clinicians (34% of the total PedFeed ECHO network) from different professional backgrounds, clinical settings, and locations participated in semistructured interviews three months post completion of eight ECHO sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inductive thematic analysis revealed three themes: (1) broad-ranging outcomes of PedFeed ECHO, (2) participant experiences of PedFeed ECHO, and (3) facilitators for future success. PedFeed ECHO was viewed very positively and provided participants with a valuable opportunity for information sharing and collaboration as a multidisciplinary team. Participants described impacts on their professional practice, knowledge, confidence, and professional isolation, as well as service and patient-level impacts. Several facilitators for the success of future PedFeed ECHO cohorts were provided.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Insights from participants will serve to improve the design and delivery of ECHO training for future cohorts. Monitoring clinical skill development over a longer period of time and exploring clinician perceptions regarding direct impact on patient care are needed to further validate the impact of ECHO.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric feeding disorder is increasing in prevalence, yet low clinician confidence regarding its management is a barrier to care. Targeted clinician training is needed as traditional didactic training programs are limited in both their accessibility and capacity to provide opportunities for the application of theory-based learning.

Methods: This study examined the experiences of a group of clinicians involved in a multidisciplinary PedFeed ECHO® network, a virtual community of practice established to support speech pathologists, occupational therapists, dieticians, and psychologists in Queensland, Australia, working with children with pediatric feeding disorder. Sixteen clinicians (34% of the total PedFeed ECHO network) from different professional backgrounds, clinical settings, and locations participated in semistructured interviews three months post completion of eight ECHO sessions.

Results: Inductive thematic analysis revealed three themes: (1) broad-ranging outcomes of PedFeed ECHO, (2) participant experiences of PedFeed ECHO, and (3) facilitators for future success. PedFeed ECHO was viewed very positively and provided participants with a valuable opportunity for information sharing and collaboration as a multidisciplinary team. Participants described impacts on their professional practice, knowledge, confidence, and professional isolation, as well as service and patient-level impacts. Several facilitators for the success of future PedFeed ECHO cohorts were provided.

Discussion: Insights from participants will serve to improve the design and delivery of ECHO training for future cohorts. Monitoring clinical skill development over a longer period of time and exploring clinician perceptions regarding direct impact on patient care are needed to further validate the impact of ECHO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专职医疗保健临床医生参加试点项目 ECHO® 计划以支持儿科喂养学习的经历。
简介:小儿喂养障碍的发病率越来越高,但临床医生对其管理的信心不足是治疗的一个障碍。传统的说教式培训项目在可及性和提供应用理论学习机会的能力方面都很有限,因此需要有针对性的临床医生培训:本研究考察了一组参与多学科 PedFeed ECHO® 网络的临床医生的经验,该网络是一个虚拟实践社区,旨在为澳大利亚昆士兰州的言语病理学家、职业治疗师、营养师和心理学家提供支持,为患有儿科喂养障碍的儿童提供服务。来自不同专业背景、临床环境和地区的 16 名临床医生(占 PedFeed ECHO 网络总人数的 34%)在完成 8 次 ECHO 课程 3 个月后参加了半结构式访谈:归纳式主题分析揭示了三个主题:(1) PedFeed ECHO 的广泛成果,(2) PedFeed ECHO 的参与者经验,(3) 未来成功的促进因素。PedFeed ECHO 得到了非常积极的评价,为参与者提供了一个作为多学科团队进行信息共享和合作的宝贵机会。参与者描述了这次活动对他们的专业实践、知识、信心和职业孤独感的影响,以及对服务和患者层面的影响。与会者还提出了未来 PedFeed ECHO 团队取得成功的几个促进因素:讨论:参与者的见解将有助于改进未来 ECHO 培训的设计和实施。为进一步验证 ECHO 的影响,需要对临床技能发展进行更长时间的监测,并探索临床医生对患者护理直接影响的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgment. Applying the Purpose, Autonomy, Confidence, Engrossment Model of Motivational Design to Support Motivation for Continuing Professional Development. The Professional Agency in Supervision of General Practitioners Before Their Supervisor Training Module: A Narrative Positioning Analysis. Assessing Physician Motivation to Engage in Continuing Professional Development on Artificial Intelligence. Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1