Maternal vascular indices at 36 weeks' gestation in pregnancy with small or growth-restricted fetus.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1002/uog.27678
A Szczepkowska, S Adjahou, I Papastefanou, M De Pauli, K H Nicolaides, M Charakida
{"title":"Maternal vascular indices at 36 weeks' gestation in pregnancy with small or growth-restricted fetus.","authors":"A Szczepkowska, S Adjahou, I Papastefanou, M De Pauli, K H Nicolaides, M Charakida","doi":"10.1002/uog.27678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare maternal vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters at 35-37 weeks' gestation in pregnancies complicated by delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or growth-restricted (FGR) neonate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for a routine hospital visit at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics, medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters, which were obtained using a non-invasive operator-independent device and included pulse-wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and heart rate. Women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded. SGA was diagnosed if birth weight was < 10<sup>th</sup> percentile. FGR was diagnosed if, in addition to birth weight < 10<sup>th</sup> percentile, at the 35-37-week scan, uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was > 95<sup>th</sup> percentile or fetal middle cerebral artery PI was < 5<sup>th</sup> percentile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 6413 women included in the study, there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) cases of FGR and 5675 (88.5%) cases that were unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were increased in the FGR group compared with the unaffected group. Aortic stiffness, as assessed by pulse-wave velocity, and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR group, compared with the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas heart rate was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGA and FGR pregnancies exhibit deranged maternal hemodynamic responses compared with unaffected pregnancies. Pregnancies with FGR have higher central blood pressure compared to those with SGA, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"480-485"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters at 35-37 weeks' gestation in pregnancies complicated by delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or growth-restricted (FGR) neonate.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for a routine hospital visit at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics, medical history, vascular indices and hemodynamic parameters, which were obtained using a non-invasive operator-independent device and included pulse-wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total peripheral resistance and heart rate. Women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were excluded. SGA was diagnosed if birth weight was < 10th percentile. FGR was diagnosed if, in addition to birth weight < 10th percentile, at the 35-37-week scan, uterine artery or umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) was > 95th percentile or fetal middle cerebral artery PI was < 5th percentile.

Results: Among the 6413 women included in the study, there were 605 (9.4%) cases of SGA, 133 (2.1%) cases of FGR and 5675 (88.5%) cases that were unaffected by SGA or FGR. Women with SGA or FGR, compared to unaffected pregnancies, had increased peripheral vascular resistance and reduced cardiac output. Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were increased in the FGR group compared with the unaffected group. Aortic stiffness, as assessed by pulse-wave velocity, and augmentation index did not differ between affected and unaffected pregnancies. In the FGR group, compared with the SGA group, central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher, whereas heart rate was lower.

Conclusions: SGA and FGR pregnancies exhibit deranged maternal hemodynamic responses compared with unaffected pregnancies. Pregnancies with FGR have higher central blood pressure compared to those with SGA, but it remains unclear whether these differences are driven by the size of the fetus or pathological fetal growth. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠 36 周时,矮小胎儿和生长受限胎儿的母体血管指数。
目的比较妊娠 35-37 周时因胎龄小 (SGA) 胎儿和胎儿生长受限 (FGR) 并发症的孕妇的血管指数和血液动力学参数:这是一项前瞻性非干预观察研究,对象是妊娠 35+0 至 36+6 周到医院进行常规检查的单胎妊娠妇女。访视内容包括记录孕产妇的人口统计学特征和病史、血管指数以及由独立于操作者的无创设备获得的血液动力学参数,包括脉搏波速度、增强指数、心输出量、每搏量、中心收缩压和舒张压、总外周阻力和胎儿心率。妊娠高血压疾病被排除在外,SGA组和FGR组的数值与未受影响的妊娠进行了比较。SGA 的诊断依据是胎儿出生时体重低于胎龄第 10 百分位数。对于 FGR,除了出生体重低于第 10 百分位数外,在 35-37 周扫描时,多普勒研究显示子宫动脉或脐动脉搏动指数(PI)高于胎龄第 95 百分位数,或胎儿大脑中动脉 PI 低于第 5 百分位数:在 6413 名参与研究的妇女中,有 605 例(9.4%)患有 SGA,133 例(2.1%)患有 FGR,5675 例(88.5%)未受 SGA 或 FGR 影响。与未受影响的孕妇相比,SGA 或 FGR 孕妇的外周血管阻力增加,心输出量减少。中心收缩压和舒张压也升高,而通过脉搏波速度和增强指数评估的主动脉僵硬度在受影响和未受影响的孕妇之间没有差异。与 SGA 组相比,FGR 组的中心收缩压和舒张压较高,而心率较低:结论:与正常妊娠相比,SGA 和 FGR 孕妇的血流动力学反应失常。与 SGA 孕妇相比,FGR 孕妇的中心血压更高,但目前还不清楚这些差异是由胎儿大小还是病理胎儿生长引起的。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
期刊最新文献
Angle between vein of Galen and straight sinus: a novel marker on microvascular flow imaging for prenatal assessment of tentorium cerebelli position. Congenital heart defects during COVID-19 pandemic. Transabdominal sonographic sliding signs for preoperative prediction of dense intra-abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean delivery. Ultrasound assessment of lymph nodes for staging of gynecological cancer: consensus opinion on terminology and examination technique. Comprehensive prenatal ultrasound for surgical risk assessment: differentiating placenta accreta spectrum from uterine scar dehiscence for improved clinical decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1