Burnout, Personal, and Occupational Factors as Predictors of Physician Assistant Faculty Intent to Leave After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q2 Health Professions Journal of Physician Assistant Education Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1097/JPA.0000000000000579
April Stouder, Candace L Ayars
{"title":"Burnout, Personal, and Occupational Factors as Predictors of Physician Assistant Faculty Intent to Leave After the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"April Stouder, Candace L Ayars","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study addressed whether burnout, personal, or occupational factors predicted physician assistant (PA) faculty intent to leave and established a new postpandemic national benchmark for PA faculty burnout and intent to leave.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In spring 2023, a nonexperimental, cross-sectional survey was emailed to 2031 PA faculty drawn from program faculty listings and the PA Education Association member database. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample, and a multiple regression analysis was conducted to analyze the predictive ability of the independent variables on intent to leave.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 30% (609 of 2031), with 496 responses (24.4%) included in the analysis. The sample reflected the population of PA faculty. The regression model significantly predicted intent leave ( P < .001). The adjusted R2 was 0.46, indicating the combination of independent variables predicted 46% of the variance in PA faculty intent to leave. Significant predictors included emotional exhaustion and identifying as multiracial ( P < .001), control and values ( P < .01), and depersonalization, fairness, rewards, and clinical year faculty role ( P < .05). The sample had moderate levels of burnout and experienced burnout at higher rates than in prepandemic studies. Physician assistant faculty in administrative leadership roles had the highest levels of burnout and intent to leave. Despite this, PA faculty intent to leave measures were similar to prepandemic levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Several of the predictive variables were related to well-being and social-emotional aspects of the workplace. These findings have implications for institutional policies and practices that support faculty well-being and workplace culture to enhance retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study addressed whether burnout, personal, or occupational factors predicted physician assistant (PA) faculty intent to leave and established a new postpandemic national benchmark for PA faculty burnout and intent to leave.

Methods: In spring 2023, a nonexperimental, cross-sectional survey was emailed to 2031 PA faculty drawn from program faculty listings and the PA Education Association member database. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample, and a multiple regression analysis was conducted to analyze the predictive ability of the independent variables on intent to leave.

Results: The response rate was 30% (609 of 2031), with 496 responses (24.4%) included in the analysis. The sample reflected the population of PA faculty. The regression model significantly predicted intent leave ( P < .001). The adjusted R2 was 0.46, indicating the combination of independent variables predicted 46% of the variance in PA faculty intent to leave. Significant predictors included emotional exhaustion and identifying as multiracial ( P < .001), control and values ( P < .01), and depersonalization, fairness, rewards, and clinical year faculty role ( P < .05). The sample had moderate levels of burnout and experienced burnout at higher rates than in prepandemic studies. Physician assistant faculty in administrative leadership roles had the highest levels of burnout and intent to leave. Despite this, PA faculty intent to leave measures were similar to prepandemic levels.

Discussion: Several of the predictive variables were related to well-being and social-emotional aspects of the workplace. These findings have implications for institutional policies and practices that support faculty well-being and workplace culture to enhance retention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倦怠、个人和职业因素是 COVID-19 大流行后医生助理教员离职意向的预测因素。
简介:本研究探讨了职业倦怠、个人因素或职业因素是否会影响助理医师(PA)的离职意向,并为助理医师的职业倦怠和离职意向建立了新的流行后国家基准:本研究探讨了职业倦怠、个人或职业因素是否会影响助理医师(PA)教员的离职意向,并为助理医师教员的职业倦怠和离职意向建立了一个新的后流行国家基准:2023 年春,我们通过电子邮件向从项目教师列表和 PA 教育协会会员数据库中抽取的 2031 名 PA 教师发送了一份非实验性横断面调查。使用描述性统计来描述样本,并进行多元回归分析来分析自变量对离职意向的预测能力:回复率为 30%(2031 份中的 609 份),其中 496 份回复(24.4%)纳入分析。样本反映了 PA 教职员工的总体情况。回归模型可明显预测离职意向(P < .001)。调整后的 R2 为 0.46,表明自变量的组合预测了 PA 教员离职意向 46% 的变异。显著的预测因素包括情绪衰竭和多种族身份(P < .001)、控制和价值观(P < .01),以及人格解体、公平、奖励和临床年级教师角色(P < .05)。该样本的职业倦怠程度适中,其倦怠率高于流行病学前的研究。担任行政领导职务的助理医师的职业倦怠程度和离职意向最高。尽管如此,助理医师教员的离职意向与流行前水平相似:讨论:一些预测变量与工作场所的幸福感和社会情感有关。这些发现对支持教职员工幸福感和工作场所文化的机构政策和实践具有影响,以提高留任率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Using Four-Component Instructional Design to Create an Interactive Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Physician Associate Students. Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants. Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link? Viewing Medical Education Through the Lens of Second Language Acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1