Factors Affecting the Discrepancy Between Coagulation Times on Extracorporeal Circulation Using Unfractionated Heparin in Children and Young Adults.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10760296241252838
Taiki Haga, Yotaro Misaki, Takaaki Sakaguchi, Yoko Akamine
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Discrepancy Between Coagulation Times on Extracorporeal Circulation Using Unfractionated Heparin in Children and Young Adults.","authors":"Taiki Haga, Yotaro Misaki, Takaaki Sakaguchi, Yoko Akamine","doi":"10.1177/10760296241252838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring during extracorporeal circulation, the traditional measures of activated clotting time (ACT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) may diverge, confounding anticoagulant adjustments. We aimed to explore the factors explaining this discrepancy in children and young adults. This retrospective observational study, conducted at an urban regional tertiary hospital, included consecutive pediatric patients who received UFH during extracorporeal circulation (continuous kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) between April 2017 and March 2021. After patients whose ACT and APTT were not measured simultaneously or who were also taking other anticoagulants were excluded, we analyzed 94 samples from 23 patients. To explain the discrepancy between ACT and APTT, regression equations were created using a generalized linear model (family  =  gamma, link  =  logarithmic) with ACT as the response variable. Other explanatory variables included age, platelet count, and antithrombin. Compared to APTT alone as an explanatory variable, the Akaike information criterion and pseudo-coefficient of determination improved from 855 to 625 and from 0.01 to 0.42, respectively, when these explanatory variables were used. In conclusion, we identified several factors that may explain some of the discrepancy between ACT and APTT in the routinely measured tests. Evaluation of these factors may aid in appropriate adjustments in anticoagulation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10335,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"30 ","pages":"10760296241252838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241252838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring during extracorporeal circulation, the traditional measures of activated clotting time (ACT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) may diverge, confounding anticoagulant adjustments. We aimed to explore the factors explaining this discrepancy in children and young adults. This retrospective observational study, conducted at an urban regional tertiary hospital, included consecutive pediatric patients who received UFH during extracorporeal circulation (continuous kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) between April 2017 and March 2021. After patients whose ACT and APTT were not measured simultaneously or who were also taking other anticoagulants were excluded, we analyzed 94 samples from 23 patients. To explain the discrepancy between ACT and APTT, regression equations were created using a generalized linear model (family  =  gamma, link  =  logarithmic) with ACT as the response variable. Other explanatory variables included age, platelet count, and antithrombin. Compared to APTT alone as an explanatory variable, the Akaike information criterion and pseudo-coefficient of determination improved from 855 to 625 and from 0.01 to 0.42, respectively, when these explanatory variables were used. In conclusion, we identified several factors that may explain some of the discrepancy between ACT and APTT in the routinely measured tests. Evaluation of these factors may aid in appropriate adjustments in anticoagulation therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响儿童和青少年使用非减量肝素体外循环凝血时间差异的因素。
在体外循环过程中进行非小剂量肝素(UFH)监测时,传统的活化凝血时间(ACT)或活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)测量方法可能会出现偏差,从而影响抗凝剂的调整。我们的目的是探索儿童和青少年出现这种差异的原因。这项回顾性观察研究在一家城市地区三级医院进行,纳入了 2017 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间在体外循环(持续肾脏替代治疗或体外膜肺氧合)期间接受 UFH 的连续儿科患者。在排除了ACT和APTT未同时测量或同时服用其他抗凝药物的患者后,我们分析了来自23名患者的94份样本。为了解释 ACT 和 APTT 之间的差异,我们使用广义线性模型(族 = 伽玛,链接 = 对数)建立了回归方程,ACT 为响应变量。其他解释变量包括年龄、血小板计数和抗凝血酶。与仅将 APTT 作为解释变量相比,当使用这些解释变量时,阿凯克信息标准和伪决定系数分别从 855 和 0.01 提高到 625 和 0.42。总之,我们发现了几个因素,这些因素可能解释了常规检测中 ACT 和 APTT 之间的一些差异。对这些因素进行评估有助于适当调整抗凝疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
150
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CATH is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal that addresses the practical clinical and laboratory issues involved in managing bleeding and clotting disorders, especially those related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular disorders. CATH covers clinical trials, studies on etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of thrombohemorrhagic disorders.
期刊最新文献
Integrating D-Dimer Thresholds into the Revised Caprini Risk Stratification to Predict Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk in Preoperative Knee Osteoarthritis Patients. Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Patients with Lung Cancer Complicated with Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Control Study. Platelet Volume Parameters as Predictors of Valvular Thrombosis Risk in Patients with Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement. Prospective Study of lncRNA NORAD for Predicting Cerebrovascular Events in Asymptomatic Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis. Analysis of Risk Factors and the Establishment of a Predictive Model for Thrombosis in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1