A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.005
Wietske I Luining, Liselotte M S Boevé, Marinus J Hagens, Dennie Meijer, Tessa de Weijer, Rosemarijn H Ettema, Remco J J Knol, Ton A Roeleveld, Sandra Srbljin, Saskia Weltings, Jose C C Koppes, Reindert J A van Moorselaar, Pim J van Leeuwen, Matthijs C F Cysouw, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, André N Vis
{"title":"A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Wietske I Luining, Liselotte M S Boevé, Marinus J Hagens, Dennie Meijer, Tessa de Weijer, Rosemarijn H Ettema, Remco J J Knol, Ton A Roeleveld, Sandra Srbljin, Saskia Weltings, Jose C C Koppes, Reindert J A van Moorselaar, Pim J van Leeuwen, Matthijs C F Cysouw, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, André N Vis","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>The prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>In total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>The use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Various risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups.

Objective: To compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial.

Design, setting, and participants: Patients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs.

Results and limitations: In total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups.

Conclusions: This study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease.

Patient summary: The use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新诊断前列腺癌患者的全球应用预后风险组别与前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描显示的转移性疾病患病率比较。
背景:全球使用各种风险分类系统(RCS)对新诊断的前列腺癌(PCa)患者进行预后分层:全球使用各种风险分类系统(RCS)对新诊断的前列腺癌(PCa)患者进行预后分层:目的:比较RCS中不同预后亚组(低危、中危和高危疾病)对前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)原发分期检测转移性疾病的预测价值,并评估进一步细分亚组是否有益:对2017年至2022年间进行PSMA-PET/CT检查的新诊断PCa患者进行回顾性研究。根据四种RCS将患者分为不同的风险组:结果测量和统计分析:结果测量和统计分析:比较了四个预后评估组中不同亚组的 PSMA-PET/CT 转移性疾病发生率:共研究了2630名新诊断为PCa的男性患者。35%的患者(931/2630)出现了转移性疾病。在被列为中危和高危的患者中,转移率约为12%至46%。两个风险分类标准进一步细分了这些组别。根据 NCCN,中危、危、高危和极高危 PCa 的转移率分别为 5.8%、13%、22% 和 62%。至于CPG,相应风险组的数值分别为6.9%、13%、21%和60%:本研究强调了细致风险分层的重要性,鉴于转移性疾病发病率的显著差异,建议进一步细分中危和高危疾病。前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PSMA-PET/CT)用于原发分期时,应保留给中危或高危不利疾病患者。患者总结:在前列腺癌患者中使用各种风险分级系统有助于确定前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描用于原发分期时转移性疾病风险较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Value of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the MET-RADS-P Criteria for Assessing the Response to Intensified Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-naïve and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Management of Small Testicular Masses: A Delphi Consensus Study. Reply to Alireza Ghoreifi and Hooman Djaladat's Letter to the Editor re: Yiling Chen, Chenyang Xu, Zezhong Mou, et al. Endoscopic Cryoablation Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.012. Oncological Outcomes of Active Surveillance versus Surgery or Ablation for Patients with Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis. Re: Yiling Chen, Chenyang Xu, Zezhong Mou, et al. Endoscopic Cryoablation Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.012.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1