{"title":"Should pipeline nitrous oxide be discontinued in secondary care: A cost-benefit analysis.","authors":"Amer Majeed, Amreen M Awan","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_791_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N<sub>2</sub>O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N<sub>2</sub>O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N<sub>2</sub>O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 2","pages":"194-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_791_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N2O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.
Methodology: Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N2O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.
Results: A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N2O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.
Conclusion: Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N2O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use.