Reliability of comorbidity indices as predictive indicators for frequent severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.

Deniz Doğan Mülazimoğlu, Bilge Bilgin, Sümeyye Ayöz, Fatma Arslan, Elif Şen
{"title":"Reliability of comorbidity indices as predictive indicators for frequent severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.","authors":"Deniz Doğan Mülazimoğlu, Bilge Bilgin, Sümeyye Ayöz, Fatma Arslan, Elif Şen","doi":"10.5578/tt.202401833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The relationship between comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is two-sided. As the number of comorbidities increases, frequency of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) consequently increases. Comorbidity indices can be used to evaluate comorbidities while managing COPD patients. We aimed to compare comorbidity indices such as the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), comorbidities in COPD index (COMCOLD) and COPD specific comorbidity test (COTE) regarding exacerbation frequency.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants hospitalized for AECOPD were included in this bidirectional case-control study. Exacerbation severity, frequency, further exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period and CCI, COMCOLD, and COTE scores were recorded. High and low comorbidity groups were compared regarding AECOPD frequency, severity, and further exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ninety-two patients were enrolled. The frequency of AECOPD was significantly higher in high-comorbidity groups (p= 0.026 for CCI; 0.015 for COTE; 0.012 for COMCOLD) than that in low-comorbidity groups. Severe AECOPD was significantly higher in all high-comorbidity groups according to the indices. Median number of exacerbations during the one-year follow-up period was significantly higher in the high-comorbidity groups defined by CCI [0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-4), p<0.001 and COMCOLD 0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-3), p= 0.007].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comorbidities are among the most important risk factors for AECOPD. Managing comorbidities begins with their identification, followed by appropriate interventions. Therefore, using at least one comorbidity index during assessment ensures that comorbidities are not overlooked during diagnostic and therapeutic processes. CCI, COTE, and COMCOLD comorbidity indices can be used in predicting COPD exacerbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"72 1","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202401833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is two-sided. As the number of comorbidities increases, frequency of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) consequently increases. Comorbidity indices can be used to evaluate comorbidities while managing COPD patients. We aimed to compare comorbidity indices such as the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), comorbidities in COPD index (COMCOLD) and COPD specific comorbidity test (COTE) regarding exacerbation frequency.

Materials and methods: Participants hospitalized for AECOPD were included in this bidirectional case-control study. Exacerbation severity, frequency, further exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period and CCI, COMCOLD, and COTE scores were recorded. High and low comorbidity groups were compared regarding AECOPD frequency, severity, and further exacerbations.

Result: Ninety-two patients were enrolled. The frequency of AECOPD was significantly higher in high-comorbidity groups (p= 0.026 for CCI; 0.015 for COTE; 0.012 for COMCOLD) than that in low-comorbidity groups. Severe AECOPD was significantly higher in all high-comorbidity groups according to the indices. Median number of exacerbations during the one-year follow-up period was significantly higher in the high-comorbidity groups defined by CCI [0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-4), p<0.001 and COMCOLD 0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-3), p= 0.007].

Conclusions: Comorbidities are among the most important risk factors for AECOPD. Managing comorbidities begins with their identification, followed by appropriate interventions. Therefore, using at least one comorbidity index during assessment ensures that comorbidities are not overlooked during diagnostic and therapeutic processes. CCI, COTE, and COMCOLD comorbidity indices can be used in predicting COPD exacerbations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将合并症指数作为预测严重慢性阻塞性肺病频繁恶化指标的可靠性。
简介合并症与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)之间的关系是双面的。随着合并症数量的增加,慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)的频率也随之增加。合并症指数可用于评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者的合并症。我们的目的是比较有关病情加重频率的合并症指数,如夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)、慢性阻塞性肺病合并症指数(COMCOLD)和慢性阻塞性肺病特异性合并症测试(COTE):这项双向病例对照研究纳入了因 AECOPD 而住院的参与者。研究记录了病情恶化的严重程度、频率、一年随访期间的进一步恶化情况以及CCI、COMCOLD和COTE评分。对高合并症组和低合并症组的 AECOPD 频率、严重程度和进一步恶化情况进行比较:结果:共收治了 92 名患者。高并发症组的 AECOPD 发生率(CCI p= 0.026;COTE p= 0.015;COMCOLD p= 0.012)明显高于低并发症组。根据各项指数,严重 AECOPD 在所有高并发症组中都明显较高。在一年的随访期间,CCI定义的高合并症组的病情加重次数中位数明显高于低合并症组[0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-4),p结论:合并症是 AECOPD 最重要的风险因素之一。处理合并症首先要识别合并症,然后采取适当的干预措施。因此,在评估过程中使用至少一种合并症指数可确保在诊断和治疗过程中不会忽略合并症。CCI、COTE 和 COMCOLD 合并症指数可用于预测慢性阻塞性肺病的恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An important radiological clue in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Diffuse pulmonary ossification. GINA step 1-2 therapy: Low-dose ICSformoterol combination taken as needed or moderate-dose ICS-formoterol combination taken as needed? Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces: A contemporary review. Pre-procedure preparation, monitoring, premedication and sedation practices of bronchoscopists in Türkiye. Radiologic severity index can be used to predict mortality risk in patients with COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1