Enhanced recovery after elective spinal surgery: an Australian pilot study.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-20 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-115
Anuj Pahwa, Houchen Gong, Yingda Li
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after elective spinal surgery: an Australian pilot study.","authors":"Anuj Pahwa, Houchen Gong, Yingda Li","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aim to reduce the physiological stress of surgery which in turn improve clinical and health economic outcomes. There is ample evidence in literature supporting ERAS methodologies in other surgical specialties, but its adoption in spinal surgery, especially in Australia remains in infancy. The aim of this project is to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for simple spine surgery, a first of its kind in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ERAS protocol was designed using an evidenced-based review of the literature. The authors then conducted a prospective cohort analysis looking at outcome of patients undergoing elective spinal (lumbar and cervical) decompression surgery under ERAS principles by a single surgeon on the Westmead Hospital Campus between March 2021 to May 2023. Primary outcomes were patient length of stay (LOS), patient reported pain and disability scores and complications (including readmissions within 30 days and re-operation within 6 months). Secondary outcomes included predictors of failure for same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients underwent spinal decompression surgeries under the ERAS protocol. Overall 43 out of 52 patients (83.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day as their surgery. Patient reported outcomes were improved at 6 weeks and 6 months confirming durability of intervention. The rates of complications were similar to literature reported rates for simple lumbar or cervical decompression procedures and there were no readmissions within 30 days or re-operations within 6 months of surgery. Being of non-English speaking background [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, P=0.04] and from home alone (OR =10.25, P=0.03) were predictors of failure of same day discharge in this small cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of ERAS protocols for simple spinal decompression surgeries is feasible and produces durable improved patient outcomes while reducing LOS in hospitals. Patient social factors can be predictive of lack of compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aim to reduce the physiological stress of surgery which in turn improve clinical and health economic outcomes. There is ample evidence in literature supporting ERAS methodologies in other surgical specialties, but its adoption in spinal surgery, especially in Australia remains in infancy. The aim of this project is to describe the early experience with an evidence-based ERAS pathway for simple spine surgery, a first of its kind in Australia.

Methods: An ERAS protocol was designed using an evidenced-based review of the literature. The authors then conducted a prospective cohort analysis looking at outcome of patients undergoing elective spinal (lumbar and cervical) decompression surgery under ERAS principles by a single surgeon on the Westmead Hospital Campus between March 2021 to May 2023. Primary outcomes were patient length of stay (LOS), patient reported pain and disability scores and complications (including readmissions within 30 days and re-operation within 6 months). Secondary outcomes included predictors of failure for same-day discharge.

Results: A total of 52 patients underwent spinal decompression surgeries under the ERAS protocol. Overall 43 out of 52 patients (83.7%) were successfully discharged on the same day as their surgery. Patient reported outcomes were improved at 6 weeks and 6 months confirming durability of intervention. The rates of complications were similar to literature reported rates for simple lumbar or cervical decompression procedures and there were no readmissions within 30 days or re-operations within 6 months of surgery. Being of non-English speaking background [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, P=0.04] and from home alone (OR =10.25, P=0.03) were predictors of failure of same day discharge in this small cohort.

Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS protocols for simple spinal decompression surgeries is feasible and produces durable improved patient outcomes while reducing LOS in hospitals. Patient social factors can be predictive of lack of compliance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化脊柱择期手术后的恢复:一项澳大利亚试点研究。
背景:加强术后恢复(ERAS)原则旨在减轻手术带来的生理压力,从而改善临床和健康经济效益。文献中有大量证据支持其他外科专科采用 ERAS 方法,但脊柱外科,尤其是澳大利亚的脊柱外科采用 ERAS 方法仍处于起步阶段。本项目的目的是介绍基于证据的ERAS路径在简单脊柱手术中的早期应用经验,这在澳大利亚尚属首次:方法:通过对文献进行循证审查,设计了 ERAS 方案。作者随后进行了一项前瞻性队列分析,研究了2021年3月至2023年5月期间在韦斯特米德医院院区由一名外科医生根据ERAS原则进行择期脊柱(腰椎和颈椎)减压手术的患者的治疗效果。主要结果包括患者住院时间(LOS)、患者疼痛和残疾评分以及并发症(包括30天内再次入院和6个月内再次手术)。次要结果包括当天出院失败的预测因素:共有52名患者根据ERAS方案接受了脊柱减压手术。52名患者中有43名(83.7%)在手术当天顺利出院。患者在6周和6个月后报告的疗效均有所改善,证实了干预的持久性。并发症发生率与文献报道的单纯腰椎或颈椎减压术相似,术后30天内没有再入院,6个月内也没有再次手术。非英语背景[几率比(OR)=6.08,P=0.04]和独自在家(OR=10.25,P=0.03)是这一小群体中当日出院失败的预测因素:结论:在简单的脊柱减压手术中实施 ERAS 方案是可行的,可持久改善患者的治疗效果,同时缩短住院时间。患者的社会因素可能会导致患者不遵医嘱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1