Implementing Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Waterpipe Tobacco Products in Lebanon: A Policy Framework Analysis of Content, Actors, Context, and Process.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae104
Rima Nakkash, Sanaa Mugharbil, Malak Tleis, Mariana Jaafar, Taghrid Asfar, Wasim Maziak
{"title":"Implementing Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Waterpipe Tobacco Products in Lebanon: A Policy Framework Analysis of Content, Actors, Context, and Process.","authors":"Rima Nakkash, Sanaa Mugharbil, Malak Tleis, Mariana Jaafar, Taghrid Asfar, Wasim Maziak","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lebanon has one of the world's highest waterpipe (WP) consumption rates. Research has documented the effectiveness of implementing pictorial health warning labels (PHWLs) on WP products at encouraging smoking cessation and discouraging youth uptake of smoking.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>This study aims to gain insight into key informants' (KIs) views on the issuance, implementation, and compliance of a decree for PHWLs on WP products. Thirteen KIs (policy makers, media, and international/local nongovernment organization representatives) were interviewed online and asked about potential barriers and facilitators they saw to issuing and implementing a PHWL decree. They were shown examples of PHWLs and asked about processes needed for implementation and compliance. The policy triangle framework (content, actors, context, and process) was used to interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was clear discrepancy and ambiguousness among the KIs' views regarding process and actors, there was more consensus and clarity around context and content. Challenges to implementation were: (1) multiple sources of production and supply of WP, (2) uncertainty regarding the responsible actors for each step, (3) prioritization of a tobacco control decree amidst a political and economic crisis, and (4) challenges to practicality of applying PHWL on the WP given its multicomponent nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research provides an in-depth understanding of KI's views regarding content, actors, context, and process in relation to the issuance, implementation, and compliance to PHWLs on WP products. Noted challenges require careful consideration if progress is to be made to introduce PHWLs.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A growing research base has documented the potential effectiveness of PHWLs on reducing WP consumption. Findings of this study show that implementing PHWLs on WP products requires a distinct understanding of the policy environment and context, as well as content, actors, and processes. Implementing PHWLs on WP tobacco products needs to address the complex nature of WP smoking as a multicomponent tobacco use method.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"1676-1683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lebanon has one of the world's highest waterpipe (WP) consumption rates. Research has documented the effectiveness of implementing pictorial health warning labels (PHWLs) on WP products at encouraging smoking cessation and discouraging youth uptake of smoking.

Aims and methods: This study aims to gain insight into key informants' (KIs) views on the issuance, implementation, and compliance of a decree for PHWLs on WP products. Thirteen KIs (policy makers, media, and international/local nongovernment organization representatives) were interviewed online and asked about potential barriers and facilitators they saw to issuing and implementing a PHWL decree. They were shown examples of PHWLs and asked about processes needed for implementation and compliance. The policy triangle framework (content, actors, context, and process) was used to interpret findings.

Results: Although there was clear discrepancy and ambiguousness among the KIs' views regarding process and actors, there was more consensus and clarity around context and content. Challenges to implementation were: (1) multiple sources of production and supply of WP, (2) uncertainty regarding the responsible actors for each step, (3) prioritization of a tobacco control decree amidst a political and economic crisis, and (4) challenges to practicality of applying PHWL on the WP given its multicomponent nature.

Conclusions: This research provides an in-depth understanding of KI's views regarding content, actors, context, and process in relation to the issuance, implementation, and compliance to PHWLs on WP products. Noted challenges require careful consideration if progress is to be made to introduce PHWLs.

Implications: A growing research base has documented the potential effectiveness of PHWLs on reducing WP consumption. Findings of this study show that implementing PHWLs on WP products requires a distinct understanding of the policy environment and context, as well as content, actors, and processes. Implementing PHWLs on WP tobacco products needs to address the complex nature of WP smoking as a multicomponent tobacco use method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黎巴嫩在水烟产品上实施图形健康警示标签:对内容、参与者、背景和过程的政策框架分析。
导言:黎巴嫩是世界上水烟(WP)消费率最高的国家之一。研究表明,在水烟产品上实施图形方式健康警示标签(PHWL)能够有效鼓励戒烟并阻止青少年吸烟。本研究旨在深入了解主要信息提供者(KIs)对发布、实施和遵守可湿性粉剂产品图形方式健康警示法令的看法:13 位关键信息提供者(政策制定者、媒体和国际/地方非政府组织代表)接受了在线访谈,并被问及他们认为颁布和实施 PHWL 法令的潜在障碍和促进因素。向他们展示了 PHWL 的实例,并询问了实施和遵守 PHWL 所需的程序。调查结果采用政策三角框架(内容、参与者、背景和过程)进行解释:尽管知识创新机构对过程和参与者的看法存在明显差异和模糊性,但对背景和内容的看法则更加一致和清晰。实施工作面临的挑战有(1) 可湿性粉剂的生产和供应有多个来源;(2) 每个步骤的责任主体不确定;(3) 在政治和经济危机中,优先考虑烟草控制法令;(4) 鉴于可湿性粉剂的多成分性质,在可湿性粉剂中应用 PHWL 的实用性面临挑战:本研究深入了解了韩国国际对有关可湿性粉剂产品 PHWL 的发布、实施和遵守的内容、参与者、背景和过程的看法。如果要在引入公共健康WL 方面取得进展,就必须认真考虑已注意到的挑战:本研究的结果表明,实施水烟产品公共健康小册子需要对政策环境和背景,以及内容、参与者和过程有明确的认识。实施水烟产品公共健康小册子需要解决水烟作为一种多成分烟草使用方法的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Diversity and Impacting Factors of Smoke-Free Legislation and Implementation in Mainland China: A Case Qualitative Research. Structural stigma and inequities in tobacco use among sexual and gender minoritized people: Accounting for context and intersectionality. Tobacco industry-backed third parties sow confusion and doubt amongst the public health community. AI for Tobacco Control: Identifying Tobacco-promoting Social Media Content Using Large Language Models. Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1