Effect of wrist orthoses on upper limb function, activities of daily living, and stress response.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20556683241250307
Junya Hirata, Manabu Yoshimura, Keiko Inoue
{"title":"Effect of wrist orthoses on upper limb function, activities of daily living, and stress response.","authors":"Junya Hirata, Manabu Yoshimura, Keiko Inoue","doi":"10.1177/20556683241250307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the effects on upper limb function, activities of daily living, and stress responses when wearing a wrist orthosis made of padded fiberglass or thermoplastic and provided essential information for selecting an orthosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one healthy adults performed two tests while not wearing a wrist orthosis, wearing a padded fiberglass wrist orthosis, and wearing a thermoplastic wrist orthosis. The Purdue Pegboard Test examined upper limb control. In the second test, the actions indicated by the Hand20 questionnaire were performed while wearing a wrist orthosis. An electrocardiogram was obtained before and after each test to identify any changes in sympathetic nervous system activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Purdue Pegboard Test scores were significantly higher when not wearing a wrist orthosis than when wearing wrist orthosis, and the Hand20 scores for all question were significantly lower. Thermoplastic wrist orthoses had fewer restrictions for upper limb function compared to padded fiberglass wrist orthoses, however activities of daily living were more limited. The low frequency/high frequency ratio and high frequency measures showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pegboard test scores and the Hand 20 scores suggest that a wrist orthosis causes restriction of upper limb function.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11047247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683241250307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the effects on upper limb function, activities of daily living, and stress responses when wearing a wrist orthosis made of padded fiberglass or thermoplastic and provided essential information for selecting an orthosis.

Methods: Thirty-one healthy adults performed two tests while not wearing a wrist orthosis, wearing a padded fiberglass wrist orthosis, and wearing a thermoplastic wrist orthosis. The Purdue Pegboard Test examined upper limb control. In the second test, the actions indicated by the Hand20 questionnaire were performed while wearing a wrist orthosis. An electrocardiogram was obtained before and after each test to identify any changes in sympathetic nervous system activity.

Results: The Purdue Pegboard Test scores were significantly higher when not wearing a wrist orthosis than when wearing wrist orthosis, and the Hand20 scores for all question were significantly lower. Thermoplastic wrist orthoses had fewer restrictions for upper limb function compared to padded fiberglass wrist orthoses, however activities of daily living were more limited. The low frequency/high frequency ratio and high frequency measures showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: Pegboard test scores and the Hand 20 scores suggest that a wrist orthosis causes restriction of upper limb function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕部矫形器对上肢功能、日常生活活动和应激反应的影响。
简介:本研究探讨了佩戴带衬垫的玻璃纤维或热塑腕部矫形器对上肢功能、日常生活活动和应激反应的影响,并为选择矫形器提供了重要信息:31名健康成年人分别在未佩戴腕部矫形器、佩戴带衬垫玻璃纤维腕部矫形器和佩戴热塑腕部矫形器的情况下进行了两项测试。普渡钉板测试主要考察上肢控制能力。在第二项测试中,在佩戴腕部矫形器的情况下进行 Hand20 问卷所显示的动作。每项测试前后都要进行心电图检查,以确定交感神经系统活动的变化:结果:未佩戴腕部矫形器时的普渡钉板测试得分明显高于佩戴腕部矫形器时的得分,而所有问题的 Hand20 得分都明显低于佩戴矫形器时的得分。与带衬垫的玻璃纤维腕部矫形器相比,热塑腕部矫形器对上肢功能的限制较少,但对日常生活活动的限制较多。低频/高频比率和高频测量结果显示没有明显差异:Pegboard测试评分和Hand 20评分表明,腕部矫形器会导致上肢功能受限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence approach for detecting and classifying abnormal behaviour in older adults using wearable sensors. Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses. Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults. Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery. Inclusive rehabilitation and assistive technologies development: An exploration of considerations, principles, and stakeholder engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1