Wound care practices following in-office cutaneous surgery among family physicians in Canada.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup5.S14
Michael Sander, Bruce Rebner, Robyn Wiens, Ilya Shoimer, Isabelle Vallerand, Megan Sander
{"title":"Wound care practices following in-office cutaneous surgery among family physicians in Canada.","authors":"Michael Sander, Bruce Rebner, Robyn Wiens, Ilya Shoimer, Isabelle Vallerand, Megan Sander","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup5.S14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Family physicians (FPs) in Canada routinely perform in-office cutaneous surgery. There is strong evidence to support a moist wound healing environment, resulting in faster healing times and improved cosmesis. However, the wound care practices of FPs have not been previously studied. We aimed to examine the postoperative wound care practices of FPs after in-office cutaneous surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was distributed to Canadian FPs to determine post-surgical wound care practices. The survey examined moist versus dry wound healing and the reasons for these recommendations were explored. Additional wound care practices were also studied. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 573 (91.5%) FPs completed the survey. Just under half (49.2%) of FPs recommended moist wound healing to their patients, while the remaining respondents (50.8%) recommended dry wound healing. The most endorsed reason for both moist and dry wound care recommendations was prior training (63.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Most physicians (57.2%) recommended the use of a cream or ointment postoperatively. While there appeared to be consensus on recommending sun avoidance after cutaneous surgery (77.7%), additional wound care practices varied, including: the use of dressings; cleansing practices; smoking cessation; reduction in physical activity; photoprotection; water exposure; and scar treatment/cosmetic use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost half of FPs in Canada responding to the survey did not recommend moist wound healing despite strong evidence to support this practice. We also noted a diverse range of postoperative wound care practices after in-office cutaneous surgery. Therefore, these results highlight a critical need for consistent wound care recommendations following cutaneous surgery for FPs in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup5.S14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Family physicians (FPs) in Canada routinely perform in-office cutaneous surgery. There is strong evidence to support a moist wound healing environment, resulting in faster healing times and improved cosmesis. However, the wound care practices of FPs have not been previously studied. We aimed to examine the postoperative wound care practices of FPs after in-office cutaneous surgery.

Method: An online survey was distributed to Canadian FPs to determine post-surgical wound care practices. The survey examined moist versus dry wound healing and the reasons for these recommendations were explored. Additional wound care practices were also studied. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken.

Results: A total of 573 (91.5%) FPs completed the survey. Just under half (49.2%) of FPs recommended moist wound healing to their patients, while the remaining respondents (50.8%) recommended dry wound healing. The most endorsed reason for both moist and dry wound care recommendations was prior training (63.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Most physicians (57.2%) recommended the use of a cream or ointment postoperatively. While there appeared to be consensus on recommending sun avoidance after cutaneous surgery (77.7%), additional wound care practices varied, including: the use of dressings; cleansing practices; smoking cessation; reduction in physical activity; photoprotection; water exposure; and scar treatment/cosmetic use.

Conclusion: Almost half of FPs in Canada responding to the survey did not recommend moist wound healing despite strong evidence to support this practice. We also noted a diverse range of postoperative wound care practices after in-office cutaneous surgery. Therefore, these results highlight a critical need for consistent wound care recommendations following cutaneous surgery for FPs in Canada.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大家庭医生诊室皮肤手术后的伤口护理实践。
目的:加拿大的家庭医生(FPs)经常在诊室内进行皮肤手术。有确凿证据表明,湿润的伤口愈合环境可加快伤口愈合时间并改善外观。然而,此前尚未对 FP 的伤口护理方法进行过研究。我们旨在研究FP医生在诊室内皮肤手术后的伤口护理方法:方法:我们向加拿大的全科医生发放了一份在线调查问卷,以了解他们的术后伤口护理方法。调查研究了湿性伤口愈合与干性伤口愈合,并探讨了提出这些建议的原因。此外,还研究了其他伤口护理方法。调查还进行了适当的统计分析:共有 573 名(91.5%)FP 完成了调查。略低于半数(49.2%)的FP向其患者推荐湿性伤口愈合,而其余的受访者(50.8%)则推荐干性伤口愈合。推荐湿性和干性伤口愈合的最主要原因是事先接受过培训(分别占 63.1% 和 65.3%)。大多数医生(57.2%)建议术后使用药膏或软膏。虽然建议皮肤手术后避免日晒似乎已达成共识(77.7%),但其他伤口护理方法却各不相同,包括:使用敷料;清洁方法;戒烟;减少体力活动;光保护;水接触;以及疤痕治疗/化妆品的使用:结论:尽管有大量证据支持湿性伤口愈合的做法,但加拿大近一半参与调查的 FPs 并不推荐这种做法。我们还注意到,诊室内皮肤手术后的术后伤口护理方法多种多样。因此,这些结果突出表明,加拿大的皮肤科医生亟需在皮肤手术后提供一致的伤口护理建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Innovative air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers in neonates. Integrating technologies to enhance risk assessment for the early detection and prevention of pressure ulcers. Posture, mobility and pressure signatures of community dwelling individuals with pressure ulcers: stratifying exposure to support personalised care. Preoperative surgical skin preparation. Pressure injury incidence measurement as a quality improvement strategy: national trends in Switzerland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1