Confidence in low vision rehabilitation and attitudes towards further learning: A survey of UK optometrists.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1111/opo.13327
Gemma Gould, Robert Harper, Michael Bowen, Christine Dickinson
{"title":"Confidence in low vision rehabilitation and attitudes towards further learning: A survey of UK optometrists.","authors":"Gemma Gould, Robert Harper, Michael Bowen, Christine Dickinson","doi":"10.1111/opo.13327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optometrists are well positioned to help expand low vision (LV) services and improve their availability and accessibility. Determinants of participation in LV service provision must be well understood to facilitate successful service expansion. This survey aimed to investigate optometrists' professional confidence in the delivery of LV services and attitudes towards further learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was emailed to a sample of College of Optometrists members. Respondents rated their confidence in different areas of core optometric practice; confidence in LV was compared with confidence in other areas. Respondents also rated their confidence in undertaking multiple tasks involved in LV service delivery and in routine optometric practice; confidence was compared between optometrists who do and do not work in a LV service. Attitudes towards learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a vision impairment (VI) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey received 451 recorded responses (15.1% response rate). Optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in LV than in other areas of core optometric practice, whereas optometrists who work in a LV service reported significantly higher confidence in LV than in other areas. Additionally, optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in all tasks involved in LV service delivery than optometrists who work in a LV service (p < 0.001 for all tasks). Approximately 80% of respondents were interested in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optometrists who do not work in a LV service have relatively low confidence in LV, which could contribute to low motivation to participate in LV service provision. There is sizeable interest in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI, which could help to increase motivation to participate in LV service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optometrists are well positioned to help expand low vision (LV) services and improve their availability and accessibility. Determinants of participation in LV service provision must be well understood to facilitate successful service expansion. This survey aimed to investigate optometrists' professional confidence in the delivery of LV services and attitudes towards further learning.

Methods: An online survey was emailed to a sample of College of Optometrists members. Respondents rated their confidence in different areas of core optometric practice; confidence in LV was compared with confidence in other areas. Respondents also rated their confidence in undertaking multiple tasks involved in LV service delivery and in routine optometric practice; confidence was compared between optometrists who do and do not work in a LV service. Attitudes towards learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a vision impairment (VI) were recorded.

Results: The survey received 451 recorded responses (15.1% response rate). Optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in LV than in other areas of core optometric practice, whereas optometrists who work in a LV service reported significantly higher confidence in LV than in other areas. Additionally, optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in all tasks involved in LV service delivery than optometrists who work in a LV service (p < 0.001 for all tasks). Approximately 80% of respondents were interested in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI.

Conclusions: Optometrists who do not work in a LV service have relatively low confidence in LV, which could contribute to low motivation to participate in LV service provision. There is sizeable interest in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI, which could help to increase motivation to participate in LV service provision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对低视力康复的信心和进一步学习的态度:英国验光师调查。
目的:验光师完全有能力帮助扩大低视力服务,提高服务的可用性和可及性。必须充分了解参与提供低视力服务的决定因素,以促进服务的成功扩展。本调查旨在了解验光师对提供低视力服务的专业信心以及对进一步学习的态度:我们通过电子邮件向验光师学院的会员发送了一份在线调查问卷。受访者对其在核心验光实践的不同领域的信心进行了评分;对低视力服务的信心与对其他领域的信心进行了比较。受访者还对他们在提供低视力服务和日常验光实践中承担多项任务的信心进行了评分;对从事和不从事低视力服务的验光师的信心进行了比较。此外,还记录了他们对学习更多有关评估和支持视力障碍(VI)患者的态度:调查共收到 451 份回复(回复率为 15.1%)。未在视力障碍服务机构工作的验光师对视力障碍的信心明显低于其他核心验光实践领域,而在视力障碍服务机构工作的验光师对视力障碍的信心明显高于其他领域。此外,不在低视力保健服务机构工作的验光师对提供低视力保健服务所涉及的所有工作的信心明显低于在低视力保健服务机构工作的验光师(p 结论:不在低视力保健服务机构工作的验光师对提供低视力保健服务所涉及的所有工作的信心明显低于在低视力保健服务机构工作的验光师:没有在低视力保健服务机构工作的验光师对低视力保健的信心相对较低,这可能导致他们参与提供低视力保健服务的积极性不高。他们对学习更多有关评估和支持视网膜病变患者的知识很感兴趣,这有助于提高他们参与提供视网膜病变服务的积极性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Refractive development II: Modelling normal and myopic eye growth. What intrinsic factors affect the central corneal thickness? The effect of lens and fitting characteristics upon scleral lens centration. Recommended improvements to the statistical guidelines. Exploring the relationship between 24-2 visual field and widefield optical coherence tomography data across healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1